Assessing and Managing Intellectual Capital to Support Open Innovation Paradigm

The objective of this paper is to support the application of Open Innovation practices in firms and organizations by the assessment and management of Intellectual Capital. Intellectual Capital constituents are analyzed in order to verify their capability of acting as key drivers of Open Innovation processes and, therefore, of creating value. A methodology is defined to settle a procedure which helps to select the most relevant Intellectual Capital value drivers and to provide Communities of Innovation with strategic and managerial guidelines in sustaining Open Innovation paradigm. An application of the methodology is developed within a specifically addressed project and its results are hereafter examined. Keywords—Assessment; Community of Innovation; Intellectual Capital; Management; Open Innovation.

[1]  John Dumay,et al.  Intellectual capital measurement: a critical approach , 2009 .

[2]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Understanding the Advantages of Open Innovation Practices in Corporate Venturing in Terms of Real Options , 2008 .

[3]  Brian Clegg,et al.  Imagination Engineering: A Toolkit for Business Creativity , 2000 .

[4]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Managing Codified Knowledge , 1999 .

[6]  Yogesh Malhotra,et al.  Integrating knowledge management technologies in organizational business processes: getting real time enterprises to deliver real business performance , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Angelo Ditillo,et al.  Intellectual Capital ‐ Navigating in the New Business Landscape , 1998 .

[8]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[9]  Pierpaolo Andriani,et al.  Managing Knowledge for Innovation , 2002 .

[10]  F. Chiaromonte Open innovation through alliances and partnership: theory and practice , 2006 .

[11]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[12]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[13]  R. West What is shared? A framework for understanding shared innovation within communities , 2009 .

[14]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Learning to Make Strategy: Balancing Discipline and Imagination , 2001 .

[15]  Daniel Andriessen,et al.  On the metaphorical nature of intellectual capital: a textual analysis , 2005 .

[16]  David M. Waguespack,et al.  Penguins, Camels, and Other Birds of a Feather: Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation Communities , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[17]  N. Bontis National Intellectual Capital Index : A United Nations Initiative for the Arab Region , 2002 .

[18]  B. Lev Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting , 2001 .

[19]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[20]  Roger V. Gould,et al.  A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Daniel W. Collins,et al.  Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years , 1997 .

[22]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The Intangible Assets Monitor , 1997 .

[23]  S. Mann Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations , 1999 .

[24]  P. Senge The Leader’s New Work: Building Learning Organizations , 2003 .

[25]  Dirk Voelkel,et al.  Managing Open Innovation in Biotechnology , 2006 .

[26]  R. Humphrey The many faces of emotional leadership , 2002 .

[27]  “ GUIDELINES FOR MANAGING AND REPORTING ON INTANGIBLES ( INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL REPORT ) ” , 2002 .

[28]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets , 2006 .

[29]  Jan Buijs Innovation Leaders Should Be Controlled Schizophrenics , 2007 .

[30]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[31]  John Kenneth Galbraith The New Industrial State , 1967 .

[32]  David Willer,et al.  Power Relations in Exchange Networks , 1988 .

[33]  F. Caeldries,et al.  Architectural redesign, interpersonal communication, and learning in R&D , 1996 .