Selection for increased number of piglets at d 5 after farrowing has increased litter size and reduced piglet mortality.

Selection for litter size at d 5 after farrowing (LS5) was introduced in 2004 to increase the number of piglets weaned and to reduce piglet mortality in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire. The objective of this study was to investigate selection responses for LS5, total number born (TNB), and mortality [MORT, defined as (TNB - LS5)/TNB] when selection for increasing LS5 was a part of the breeding goal. Data were collected from nucleus herds recorded from 2004 to 2010, including first litters of 42,807 Landrace sows and 33,225 Yorkshire sows. The data were analyzed using a 3-trait animal model of TNB, MORT, and LS5. Significant (co) variances were estimated between the 3 traits in both populations. The heritabilities of TNB, MORT, and LS5 were 0.10, 0.09, and 0.09 in Landrace and 0.12, 0.10, and 0.10 in Yorkshire. The genetic correlations were 0.28 and 0.22 between TNB and MORT, 0.74 and 0.68 between TNB and LS5, and -0.43 and -0.57 between MORT and LS5 in Landrace and Yorkshire, respectively. The results show that the genetic improvement of LS5 was a combination of increased TNB and reduced MORT. During the observation period, the genetic improvement was 1.7 piglets per litter for LS5, 1.3 piglets per litter for TNB, and 4.7% for MORT in Landrace and 2.2 piglets per litter, 1.9 piglets per litter, and 5.9% in Yorkshire. Phenotypic improvement was 1.4 piglets per litter for LS5, 0.3 piglets per litter for TNB, and 7.9% for MORT in Landrace and 2.1 piglets per litter, 1.3 piglets per litter, and 7.6% in Yorkshire. In addition, genetic gain was evaluated in 3 phenotypic groups of TNB, representing the 25% smallest litters, the 50% medium litters, and the 25% largest litters. In all 3 groups, the genetic and phenotypic gains of TNB and LS5 increased, whereas MORT reduced in both populations.

[1]  J. Bidanel Biology and Genetics of reproduction , 2011 .

[2]  I. Misztal,et al.  Genetic analyses of stillbirth in relation to litter size using random regression models. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[3]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Genetic parameters of piglet survival and birth weight from a two-generation crossbreeding experiment under outdoor conditions designed to disentangle direct and maternal effects. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[4]  D. Sorensen,et al.  A Genetic Analysis of Mortality in Pigs , 2010, Genetics.

[5]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Genetic analyses of piglet survival and individual birth weight on first generation data of a selection experiment for piglet survival under outdoor conditions , 2009 .

[6]  J Casellas,et al.  Bayesian threshold analysis of direct and maternal genetic parameters for piglet mortality at farrowing in Large White, Landrace, and Pietrain populations. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[7]  M. Lund,et al.  Variance and covariance components for liability of piglet survival during different periods. , 2008, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[8]  M. Lund,et al.  Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[9]  E. Kanis,et al.  Breeding for improved welfare in pigs: a conceptual framework and its use in practice , 2004 .

[10]  R. Johnson,et al.  Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[11]  L. Rydhmer,et al.  Genetic parameters for within-litter variation in piglet birth weight and change in within-litter variation during suckling. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[12]  Lotta Rydhmer,et al.  Relationship between litter size and perinatal and pre-weaning survival in pigs , 2002 .

[13]  J.A.M. van Arendonk,et al.  Direct, maternal and nurse sow genetic effects on farrowing-, pre-weaning- and total piglet survival , 2002 .

[14]  D. Sorensen,et al.  Bayesian analysis of response to selection: a case study using litter size in Danish Yorkshire pigs. , 2000, Genetics.

[15]  R. Johnson,et al.  Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[16]  D. Mather,et al.  Estimation of phenotypic selection differentials for predicting genetic responses to ratio-based selection. , 1988, Genome.

[17]  C. Haley,et al.  Selection for litter size in the pig. , 1988 .

[18]  K. M. Irvin,et al.  Genetic, phenotypic and environmental relationships between sow body weight and sow productivity traits. , 1985, Journal of animal science.

[19]  F. C. Gunsett Linear Index Selection to Improve Traits Defined as Ratios , 1984 .

[20]  W. Lamberson,et al.  PREWEANING SURVIVAL IN SWINE: HERITABILITY OF DIRECT AND MATERNAL EFFECTS ~ , 1984 .