Changes in cortical activity during suppression in stereoblindness

Patients with strabismus or anisometropic amblyopia fixate and attend with one eye and suppress the image from the other eye. Here we use a visual evoked potential technique to show that patients who lack normal stereopsis retain suppressive binocular interactions but lack a characteristic form of nonlinear binocular interaction that is present in normal observers. Oscillating grating targets presented at different temporal frequencies in the two eyes evoke a strong response in normal observers at a frequency equal to the sum of the two input frequencies for fusable targets but not for rivalrous ones.However increasing contrast in one eye reduces the response amplitude from the other eye under either fusable (dichoptic masking) or rivalrous conditions. Stereo-deficient observers lack the sum-frequency response, but retain dichoptic masking interactions. Dichoptic masking is stronger when the masker is presented to the patients' dominant rather than non-dominant eyes, suggesting that a subset of preserved binocular inhibitory interactions form the basis of clinical suppression.

[1]  R. Sireteanu,et al.  Naso-temporal asymmetries in human amblyopia: Consequence of long-term interocular suppression , 1981, Vision Research.

[2]  R. Lansing Electroencephalographic Correlates of Binocular Rivalry in Man , 1964, Science.

[3]  M Eizenman,et al.  A new VEP system for studying binocular single vision in human infants. , 1993, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[4]  A. Norcia,et al.  A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP , 1997, Vision Research.

[5]  Amblyopia and suppression in binocular cortical neurones of strabismic cat. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[6]  K. Wright,et al.  PVEP evidence of true suppression in adult onset strabismus. , 1990, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[7]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Development and Plasticity of Cortical Processing Architectures , 1995, Science.

[8]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Monocularly deprived cats: binocular tests of cortical cells reveal functional connections from the deprived eye , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  R. F. Hess,et al.  Binocular integration of contrast information in amblyopia , 1992, Vision Research.

[10]  Anthony M. Norcia,et al.  Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP , 1989, Vision Research.

[11]  R Blake,et al.  Clinical suppression and amblyopia. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  D. Levi,et al.  Evidence for nonlinear binocular interactions in human visual cortex , 1988, Vision Research.

[13]  A. Norcia,et al.  Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  A. Norcia,et al.  An adaptive filter for steady-state evoked responses. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  W. Cobb,et al.  Cerebral Potentials evoked by Pattern Reversal and their Suppression in Visual Rivalry , 1967, Nature.

[16]  F. Campbell,et al.  Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopias: The effect of mean luminance , 1980, Vision Research.