Hands-off Linear Interaction Energy Approach to Binding Mode and Affinity Estimation of Estrogens
暂无分享,去创建一个
Sebastian Schmidt | Marcus Weber | Vedat Durmaz | Peggy Sabri | Christian Piechotta | Marcus Weber | V. Durmaz | C. Piechotta | S. Schmidt | P. Sabri
[1] D. Rubin,et al. Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .
[2] M. Parrinello,et al. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.
[3] P. Kollman,et al. Application of RESP charges to calculate conformational energies, hydrogen bond energies, and free energies of solvation , 1993 .
[4] D. van der Spoel,et al. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation , 1995 .
[5] A. Tropsha,et al. Beware of q 2 , 2002 .
[6] W. Tong,et al. QSAR Models Using a Large Diverse Set of Estrogens. , 2001 .
[7] Carsten Kutzner,et al. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[8] Jonathan W. Essex,et al. Prediction of protein–ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[9] V. Hornak,et al. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.
[10] Direct Reweighting Strategies in Conformation Dynamics , 2011 .
[11] D. Beveridge,et al. Free energy via molecular simulation: applications to chemical and biomolecular systems. , 1989, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.
[12] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[13] H Fang,et al. The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands. , 2000, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[14] J. Kirkwood. Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures , 1935 .
[15] M. Hestenes,et al. Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems , 1952 .
[16] Paolo Tosco,et al. A 3D-QSAR-Driven Approach to Binding Mode and Affinity Prediction , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[17] Eric J. Sorin,et al. Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations. , 2005, Biophysical journal.
[18] David S. Goodsell,et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..
[19] Berk Hess,et al. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..
[20] B. Pendleton,et al. Hybrid Monte Carlo simulations theory and initial comparison with molecular dynamics , 1993 .
[21] Ajay N. Jain,et al. Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.
[22] Chris Oostenbrink,et al. Are Automated Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Binding Free Energy Calculations Realistic Tools in Lead Optimization? An Evaluation of the Linear Interaction Energy (LIE) Method , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[23] R. Zwanzig. High‐Temperature Equation of State by a Perturbation Method. I. Nonpolar Gases , 1954 .
[24] P. Kollman,et al. Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[25] Jens Carlsson,et al. Predicting binding modes from free energy calculations. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[26] K. Grandien,et al. Printed in U.S.A. Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society Comparison of the Ligand Binding Specificity and Transcript Tissue Distribution of Estrogen Receptors � and � , 2022 .
[27] Andrzej M. Brzozowski,et al. Interaction of Transcriptional Intermediary Factor 2 Nuclear Receptor Box Peptides with the Coactivator Binding Site of Estrogen Receptor α* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[28] M Rarey,et al. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[29] C. M. Reeves,et al. Function minimization by conjugate gradients , 1964, Comput. J..
[30] Irwin D. Kuntz,et al. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5 , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[31] Chris Oostenbrink,et al. Computational Prediction of Binding Affinity for CYP1A2-Ligand Complexes Using Empirical Free Energy Calculations , 2010, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.
[32] Peter A. Kollman,et al. FREE ENERGY CALCULATIONS : APPLICATIONS TO CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA , 1993 .
[33] A. Tropsha,et al. Beware of q2! , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[34] H. Berendsen,et al. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .
[35] Junmei Wang,et al. Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[36] Akash Khandelwal,et al. Improved estimation of ligand–macromolecule binding affinities by linear response approach using a combination of multi-mode MD simulation and QM/MM methods , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[37] Marcus Weber,et al. Classical hybrid Monte-Carlo simulation of the interconversion of hexabromocyclododecane stereoisomers , 2008 .
[38] J. Aqvist,et al. A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. , 1994, Protein engineering.
[39] Yan Li,et al. In Silico Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Subtype Binding Affinity and Selectivity Using Statistical Methods and Molecular Docking with 2-Arylnaphthalenes and 2-Arylquinolines , 2010, International journal of molecular sciences.
[40] K. Korach,et al. Diethylstilbestrol and Other Estrogens in the Environment , 1984 .
[41] N. Foloppe,et al. Towards predictive ligand design with free-energy based computational methods? , 2006, Current medicinal chemistry.
[42] Berk Hess,et al. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997 .
[43] C. E. Peishoff,et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[44] T. Halgren. Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..
[45] J M Blaney,et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[46] Marcus Weber,et al. How to simulate affinities for host–guest systems lacking binding mode information: application to the liquid chromatographic separation of hexabromocyclododecane stereoisomers , 2012, Journal of Molecular Modeling.
[47] Nico P E Vermeulen,et al. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[48] T. Darden,et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .
[49] Araz Jakalian,et al. Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: I. Method , 2000 .
[50] Christopher I. Bayly,et al. Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..
[51] K. Andrae,et al. A simple method for the estimation of entropy differences , 2010 .
[52] A. Kennedy,et al. Hybrid Monte Carlo , 1988 .
[53] Gerrit Groenhof,et al. GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[54] W. L. Jorgensen,et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .
[55] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..