Evaluation of a minimally invasive endovascular neural interface for decoding motor activity

Endovascular devices like the Stentrode™ provide a minimally invasive approach to brain-machine-interfaces that mitigates safety concerns while maintaining good signal quality. Our research aims to evaluate the feasibility of using a stent-electrode array (Stentrode) to decode movements in sheep. In this study, two sheep were trained to perform an automated forced-choice task designed to elicit left and right head movement following an external stimulus. Cortical, movement-related signals were recorded using a Stentrode placed in the superior sagittal sinus adjacent to the motor cortex. Recorded brain signal was used to train a support vector machine classifier. Our results show that the Stentrode can be used to acquire motor-related brain signals to detect movement of the sheep in a forced-choice task. These results support the validity of using the Stentrode as a minimally invasive brain-machine interface.

[1]  Rabab K. Ward,et al.  Comparing Different Classifiers in Sensory Motor Brain Computer Interfaces , 2015, PloS one.

[2]  Per B. Sederberg,et al.  Meeting brain–computer interface user performance expectations using a deep neural network decoding framework , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[3]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  A brain–computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[5]  Leonid Churilov,et al.  Minimally invasive endovascular stent-electrode array for high-fidelity, chronic recordings of cortical neural activity , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  S. Coyle,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: a review , 2003 .

[7]  Yan T Wong,et al.  Spatially dynamic recurrent information flow across long‐range dorsal motor network encodes selective motor goals , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Antonio Jimeno-Yepes,et al.  Decoding EEG and LFP signals using deep learning: heading TrueNorth , 2016, Conf. Computing Frontiers.

[9]  Ravi Vaidyanathan,et al.  Predicting movement and laterality from Deep Brain Local Field Potentials , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Medical Engineering, Health Informatics and Technology (MediTec).

[10]  Michael H Fox,et al.  Prevalence and Causes of Paralysis-United States, 2013. , 2016, American journal of public health.

[11]  G. Schalk,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces Using Electrocorticographic Signals , 2011, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Iulia-Alexandra Lungu,et al.  Predicting voluntary movements from motor cortical activity with neuromorphic hardware , 2017, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[13]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Decoding two-dimensional movement trajectories using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[14]  Peter Konrad,et al.  Implantable brain computer interface: Challenges to neurotechnology translation , 2010, Neurobiology of Disease.

[15]  A. Jennifer Morton,et al.  Executive Decision-Making in the Domestic Sheep , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  J. A. Wilson,et al.  Two-dimensional movement control using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  Patricia Desmond,et al.  An ovine model of cerebral catheter venography for implantation of an endovascular neural interface. , 2017, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  Terence J O'Brien,et al.  Signal quality of simultaneously recorded endovascular, subdural and epidural signals are comparable , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Karim Jerbi,et al.  Exceeding chance level by chance: The caveat of theoretical chance levels in brain signal classification and statistical assessment of decoding accuracy , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  G. White,et al.  Animal models for the assessment of novel vascular conduits. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.