Peripheral guidance in scenes: The interaction of scene context and object content.

In the present study, we examined how gaze guidance is affected by immediately available information in the periphery and investigated how search strategies differed across manipulations in the availability of scene context and object content information. Across 3 experiments, participants performed a visual search task in scenes while using a gaze-contingent moving-window paradigm. Extrafoveal information was manipulated across conditions to examine the contributions of object content, scene context, or some combination of the two. Experiment 1 demonstrated a possible interaction between scene context and object content information in improving guidance. Experiments 2 and 3 supported the notion that object content is selected for further scrutiny based on its position within scene context. These results suggest a prioritization of object information based on scene context, such that contextual information acts as a framework in the selection of relevant regions, and object information can then affect which specific locations in those regions are selected for further examination.

[1]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[2]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[3]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Saliency, attention, and visual search: an information theoretic approach. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[4]  G. Zelinsky.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. , 2008, Psychological review.

[5]  S Saida,et al.  Useful visual field size for pattern perception , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Myriam Chanceaux,et al.  The influence of clutter on real-world scene search: evidence from search efficiency and eye movements. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[7]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4 , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  Rudolf Groner,et al.  The effect of spatial frequency content on parameters of eye movements , 2008, Psychological research.

[9]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES , 2007 .

[10]  A. Nuthmann.  How do the regions of the visual field contribute to object search in real-world scenes? Evidence from eye movements. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M. Boucart,et al.  Implicit processing of scene context in macular degeneration. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  The limits of visual resolution in natural scene viewing , 2005 .

[13]  M. Eckstein,et al.  Quantifying the Performance Limits of Human Saccadic Targeting during Visual Search , 2001, Perception.

[14]  J. Henderson,et al.  Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Paul M.J. van Diepen,et al.  The Use of Coarse and Fine Peripheral Information During the Final Part of Fixations in Scene Perception , 1999 .

[16]  A. Friedman.  Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Yuanzhen Li,et al.  Measuring visual clutter. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[18]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Scene categorization at large visual eccentricities , 2013, Vision Research.

[19]  A. Tustin.  Automatic Control , 1951, Nature.

[20]  Krista A. Ehinger,et al.  Modelling search for people in 900 scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance , 2009 .

[21]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[22]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[23]  James T. Enns,et al.  Three-dimensional features that pop out in visual search. , 1990 .

[24]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  Investigating spatial vision and dynamic attentional selection using a gaze-contingent multiresolutional display. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[25]  Ashley M. Sherman,et al.  Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[26]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object identification without foveal vision: Evidence from an artificial scotoma paradigm , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? , 2001, Vision Research.

[28]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[29]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[30]  J. Findlay.  Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[31]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[32]  D. S. Wooding,et al.  Automatic control of saccadic eye movements made in visual inspection of briefly presented 2-D images. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[33]  M. Castelhano,et al.  Scene context influences without scene gist: Eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  A. Torralba,et al.  The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  S. Shioiri,et al.  Useful Resolution for Picture Perception as a Function of Eccentricity , 1989, Perception.

[36]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Scene Perception for Psycholinguists. , 2004 .

[37]  P Reinagel,et al.  Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze. , 1999, Network.

[38]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[39]  T. Foulsham,et al.  What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[40]  J. Henderson,et al.  High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  M. Castelhano,et al.  The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[42]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  How context information and target information guide the eyes from the first epoch of search in real-world scenes. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[43]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  10 – THE PERCEPTION OF FORM: Retina to Striate Cortex , 1989 .

[44]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[45]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[46]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Control of fixation duration during scene viewing by interaction of foveal and peripheral processing. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[47]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Saccade control in natural images is shaped by the information visible at fixation: evidence from asymmetric gaze-contingent windows , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[48]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Scene context guides eye movements during visual search , 2006, Vision Research.

[49]  C. Scialfa,et al.  Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Melissa L.-H. Võ,et al.  A glimpse is not a glimpse: Differential processing of flashed scene previews leads to differential target search benefits , 2010 .

[51]  Nancy Millette,et al.  How People Look at Pictures , 1935 .

[52]  A. Friedman.  Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  P. V. Diepen.  A pixel-resolution video switcher for eye-contingent display changes , 1997 .

[54]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[56]  K. Rayner.  The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  P. de Graef,et al.  Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification , 1990, Psychological research.

[58]  A. Treisman.  Visual Attention and the Perception of Features and Objects , 1994 .

[59]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Optimal and Preferred Eye Landing Positions in Objects and Scenes , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[60]  R. Desimone,et al.  Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons , 2000, Neuron.

[61]  G. Zelinsky,et al.  An effect of referential scene constraint on search implies scene segmentation , 2009 .

[62]  R. D. Gordon.  Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  Investigating spatial vision and dynamic attentional selection using a gaze-contingent multiresolutional display. , 2002 .

[64]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[65]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors , 2005, Psychological science.

[66]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  Jodi L. Davenport,et al.  Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.

[68]  N. Mackworth,et al.  The gaze selects informative details within pictures , 1967 .

[69]  M. Bravo,et al.  Recognizing and segmenting objects in clutter , 2004, Vision Research.

[70]  A. Oliva,et al.  Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[71]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[72]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Movements of the Eyes , 1978 .

[73]  Géry d'Ydewalle,et al.  Functional Division of the Visual Field , 1998 .

[74]  E. Matin.  Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[76]  D E Williams,et al.  Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: The effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[77]  M. Pomplun,et al.  Peripheral and parafoveal cueing and masking effects on saccadic selectivity in a gaze-contingent window paradigm , 2001, Vision Research.