Electrophysiologic characteristics of basal forebrain neurons in vitro.

Our data show that different cell types recorded in vitro can be identified by their intrinsic membrane properties. One type of neuron, namely S-AHP cells, have the ability to fire single action potentials in a rhythmic fashion following sufficient membrane depolarization. The rate is apparently controlled by several voltage-dependent conductances. S-AHP cells are normally quiescent at their resting potentials but will discharge once threshold is reached (-55 to -60 mV). Importantly, S-AHP (or F-AHP) cells will not convert into burst-firing neurons merely with changes in membrane potential. On the other hand, burst-firing cells have the ability to switch to a repetitive-firing pattern following membrane depolarization. All of these data provide a first step in an understanding of the firing rates of basal forebrain neurons, however, our results must be consolidated with existing in vivo studies for a more general understanding of basal forebrain function. Comparing our data to an in vivo preparation of the MS/nDB with synaptic afferents surgically removed may be one approach to correlating in vitro and in vivo studies. Vinogradova et al. (1980) used single unit recording techniques in unanesthetized chronic rabbits and compared the firing rates of cells before and after deafferentation. These authors reported a preservation of burst-firing neurons (25% of the cells) after deafferentation but with a significant reduction in the mean frequency of bursts. In addition a higher percentage of regularly firing cells also occurred following deafferentation (Vinogradova et al., 1980). It is interesting to speculate that these regularly firing cells may correspond to S-AHP cells in our in vitro studies, and some of the burst-firing units may correspond to the burst-firing cells we record in slices. Nevertheless, the in vivo data strongly suggests that endogenous regular spiking as well as rhythmic burst capabilities are present in some MS/nDB cells, however, the firing rates of most MS/nDB neurons are strongly influenced by synaptic afferents (see also Vinogradova et al., 1980; 1987). The endogenous activity in vivo can be explained, in part, by the intrinsic properties elucidated in our in vitro studies. How the synaptic afferents control MS/nDB circuitry and integrative output is premature to speculate without a more thorough understanding of the synaptic mechanisms involved. It is possible that future in vitro studies will help define these mechanisms and again contribute to an understanding of basal forebrain function.

[1]  Johan F. Storm,et al.  Temporal integration by a slowly inactivating K+ current in hippocampal neurons , 1988, Nature.

[2]  G. Aghajanian,et al.  Pacemaker potentials of serotonergic dorsal raphe neurons: Contribution of a low‐threshold Ca2+ conductance , 1987, Synapse.

[3]  P. Dutar,et al.  Activation of identified septo-hippocampal neurons by noxious peripheral stimulation , 1985, Brain Research.

[4]  Q. Pittman,et al.  Electrophysiological analysis of potential arginine vasopressin projections to the ventral septal area of the rat , 1985, Brain Research.

[5]  O. Vinogradova,et al.  Modulation of the afferent input to the septal neurons by cholinergic drugs , 1988, Brain Research.

[6]  P. Dutar,et al.  Septo-hippocampal and other medial septum-diagonal band neurons: electrophysiological and pharmacological properties , 1984, Brain Research.

[7]  J. Miller,et al.  The role of a raphe serotonin system in the control of septal unit activity and hippocampal desynchronization , 1978, Neuroscience.

[8]  M Stewart,et al.  Two populations of rhythmically bursting neurons in rat medial septum are revealed by atropine. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  C. Stevens,et al.  Voltage clamp studies of a transient outward membrane current in gastropod neural somata , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  M. Segal Properties of rat medial septal neurones recorded in vitro. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  Paul R. Adams,et al.  Voltage-clamp analysis of muscarinic excitation in hippocampal neurons , 1982, Brain Research.

[12]  J. López-Barneo,et al.  Ionic basis of the differential neuronal activity of guinea‐pig septal nucleus studied in vitro. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  J J Miller,et al.  The hippocampal control of neuronal discharges in the septum of the rat , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  J. T. Williams,et al.  Membrane properties of rat locus coeruleus neurones , 1984, Neuroscience.

[15]  Robert T. Matthews,et al.  Electrophysiology of AChE-positive neurons in basal forebrain slices , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  M. Segal Responses of septal nuclei neurons to microiontophoretically administered putative neurotransmitters. , 1974, Life sciences.

[17]  Michael A. Rogawski,et al.  The A-current: how ubiquitous a feature of excitable cells is it? , 1985, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  R. Llinás,et al.  Electrophysiology of mammalian thalamic neurones in vitro , 1982, Nature.

[19]  O D Creutzfeldt,et al.  Crosscorrelation between the activity of septal units and hippocampal EEG during arousal. , 1974, Brain research.

[20]  J. Hubbard,et al.  Responses in the diagonal band of Broca evoked by stimulation of the fornix in the cat. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  E. Neher Two Fast Transient Current Components during Voltage Clamp on Snail Neurons , 1971, The Journal of general physiology.

[22]  M. Segal Brain stem afferents to the rat medial septum. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  W. Griffith,et al.  Comparison of 4-aminopyridine and tetrahydroaminoacridine on basal forebrain neurons. , 1990, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[24]  J. D. Green,et al.  Hippocampal electrical activity in arousal. , 1954, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  O. Vinogradova,et al.  Neuronal activity of the septum following various types of deafferentation , 1980, Brain Research.

[26]  P. Dutar,et al.  Effect of psychotropic drugs on identified septohippocampal neurons , 1988, Neuroscience.

[27]  W. Griffith,et al.  Membrane properties of cell types within guinea pig basal forebrain nuclei in vitro. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  R. Llinás,et al.  Electrophysiological properties of guinea‐pig thalamic neurones: an in vitro study. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  D. Carpenter,et al.  Action of vasopressin on CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices , 1984, Brain Research.