A base isolation system placed within a structure for seismic protection will perform differently in the presence of soil-structure-interaction phenomena, as compared to the case where the structure is founded on competent soil and/or rock. This is so for two basic reasons: (a) there is filtering affecting the input ground motion signal at the base of the structure, and (b) the overall mechanical characteristics of the combined soil-structure system have changed as compared to the original structure resting on firm ground. Thus, a base isolation design has to account for soil-structure-interaction in order to have the system fine-tuned to the particular geological conditions and seismicity of the construction site in question. In this work, we introduce a distributed mass representation of the superstructure that has four possible dynamic response modes, namely flexure, shearing, torsion and axial vibrations. The foundation is treated as a rigid block, and the soil is represented by the equivalent spring-damper-virtual mass system, whereby these mechanical parameters may be frequency dependent. Typical base isolation systems used nowadays are lead rubber bearing designs whose mechanical behavior comprises a spring element, a damper and a hysteretic component. In terms of analysis, a substructuring methodology is employed that is cast in the frequency domain, with conditions of equilibrium and compatibility enforced at the common structure-foundation-soil boundaries. This approach is both efficient and adequate for investigating soil-structure-interaction effects, but cannot handle the hysteretic behavior of the base isolator, which is better captured by using time-stepping algorithms. In closing, some comments are made regarding possible ways for incorporating the base isolator in the present soil-structural system analysis, along with some preliminary results.
[1]
V. Koumousis,et al.
An inelastic beam element with hysteretic damping
,
2008
.
[2]
Emilio Rosenblueth,et al.
Fundamentals of earthquake engineering
,
1971
.
[3]
Nicos Makris,et al.
The eigenvalues of isolated bridges with transverse restraints at the end abutments
,
2009
.
[4]
K. Graff.
Wave Motion in Elastic Solids
,
1975
.
[5]
Farzad Naeim,et al.
Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice
,
1999
.
[6]
Erdal Safak,et al.
Wave-Propagation Formulation of Seismic Response of Multistory Buildings
,
1999
.
[7]
R. P. Sharma,et al.
Soil-structure interaction in the time domain
,
1993
.
[8]
H. Saunders,et al.
Finite element procedures in engineering analysis
,
1982
.
[9]
Eduardo Kausel,et al.
Early history of soil–structure interaction
,
2010
.
[10]
Dragan T. Spasić,et al.
On Viscoelastic Compliant Contact-Impact Models
,
2004
.
[11]
Anastasios Sextos,et al.
Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective
,
2010
.
[12]
R. Clough,et al.
Dynamics Of Structures
,
1975
.
[13]
Costas P. Providakis,et al.
Effect of supplemental damping on LRB and FPS seismic isolators under near-fault ground motions
,
2009
.
[14]
George Gazetas,et al.
Development of Analysis and Design Procedures for Spread Footings
,
2002
.