Comparison of Views of the Nature of Science between Natural Science and Nonscience Majors

Science educators have the common goal of helping students develop scientific literacy, including understanding of the nature of science (NOS). University faculties are challenged with the need to develop informed NOS views in several major student subpopulations, including science majors and nonscience majors. Research into NOS views of undergraduates, particularly science majors, has been limited. In this study, NOS views of undergraduates in introductory environmental science and upper-level animal behavior courses were measured using Likert items and open-ended prompts. Analysis revealed similarities in students' views between the two courses; both populations held a mix of naïve, transitional, and moderately informed views. Comparison of pre- and postcourse mean scores revealed significant changes in NOS views only in select aspects of NOS. Student scores on sections addressing six aspects of NOS were significantly different in most cases, showing notably uninformed views of the distinctions between scientific theories and laws. Evidence-based insight into student NOS views can aid in reforming undergraduate science courses and will add to faculty and researcher understanding of the impressions of science held by undergraduates, helping educators improve scientific literacy in future scientists and diverse college graduates.

[1]  Russell D. Wolfinger,et al.  Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using the SAS System , 1999 .

[2]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Classroom factors related to changes in students' conceptions of the nature of science , 1985 .

[3]  Gerald H. Krockover,et al.  IDEAS ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE HELD BY UNDERGRADUATE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE STUDENTS , 2008 .

[4]  A. Ryan,et al.  Students' Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science , 1992 .

[5]  J. Olson,et al.  The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents , 1998 .

[6]  H. S. Steyn,et al.  Estimating an Effect Size in One-Way Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) , 2009, Multivariate behavioral research.

[7]  Victor Y. Billeh,et al.  Factors Affecting Teachers' Gain in Understanding the Nature of Science. , 1975 .

[8]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .

[9]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge , 1978 .

[10]  Ling L. Liang,et al.  PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ABOUT NATURE OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT: AN INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE STUDY , 2009 .

[11]  Lawrence B. Flick,et al.  Scientific inquiry and nature of science : implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education , 2004 .

[12]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature , 2000 .

[13]  Rola Khishfe,et al.  Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders' Views of Nature of Science. , 2002 .

[14]  Osman Nafiz Kaya,et al.  Assessing Preservice Elementary Teachers' Views on the Nature of Scientific Knowledge: A Dual-Response Instrument. , 2008 .

[15]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[16]  Norman G. Lederman.  Relating Teaching Behavior and Classroom Climate to Changes in Students' Conceptions of the Nature of Science. , 1986 .

[17]  Milton O. Pella,et al.  The development of an instrument for inventorying knowledge of the processes of science , 1967 .

[18]  L. Wilson.  A study of opinions related to the nature of science and its purpose in society , 1954 .

[19]  Alfredo Bezzi,et al.  What Is This Thing Called Geoscience? Epistemological Dimensions Elicited with the Repertory Grid and Their Implications for Scientific Literacy. , 1999 .

[20]  John E. Penick,et al.  The influence of classroom climate on science process and content achievement of community college students , 1983 .

[21]  R. Hackett.  Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[22]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis Using The SAS1 System , 1995 .

[23]  W. Sandoval.  Understanding Students' Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning Through Inquiry , 2005 .

[24]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2004 .

[25]  Bashirah Ibrahim,et al.  Profiles of freshman physics students' views on the nature of science , 2009 .

[26]  P. Westfall,et al.  Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using SAS , 2011 .

[27]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick.  Over And Over And Over Again: College Students' Views Of Nature Of Science , 2006 .

[28]  William F. McComas,et al.  The Role and Character of the Nature of Science in Science Education , 1998 .

[29]  渋江 靖弘,et al.  Science for All Americans , 1990 .

[30]  Edward L. Smith,et al.  Development and Validation of the Conceptions of Scientific Theories Test. , 1981 .

[31]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The Effect of Teachers' Language on Students' Conceptions of the Nature of Science. , 1989 .

[32]  C. Olin-Scheller,et al.  Differences in the Scientific Epistemological Views of Undergraduate Students , 2008 .

[33]  Zoubeida R. Dagher,et al.  Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution , 1997 .

[34]  Derek Hodson,et al.  From the Horse's Mouth: What Scientists Say About Scientific Investigation and Scientific Knowledge , 2009 .

[35]  William F. McComas,et al.  The nature of science in science education : rationales and strategies , 1998 .

[36]  Andrew Elby,et al.  On the Substance of a Sophisticated Epistemology. , 2001 .