Detailed Assessment of the Kinetics of Hg-Cell Association, Hg Methylation, and Methylmercury Degradation in Several Desulfovibrio Species

ABSTRACT The kinetics of inorganic Hg [Hg(II)i] association, methylation, and methylmercury (MeHg) demethylation were examined for a group of Desulfovibrio species with and without MeHg production capability. We employed a detailed method for assessing MeHg production in cultures, including careful control of medium chemistry, cell density, and growth phase, plus mass balance of Hg(II)i and MeHg during the assays. We tested the hypothesis that differences in Hg(II)i sorption and/or uptake rates drive observed differences in methylation rates among Desulfovibrio species. Hg(II)i associated rapidly and with high affinity to both methylating and nonmethylating species. MeHg production by Hg-methylating strains was rapid, plateauing after ∼3 h. All MeHg produced was rapidly exported. We also tested the idea that all Desulfovibrio species are capable of Hg(II)i methylation but that rapid demethylation masks its production, but we found this was not the case. Therefore, the underlying reason why MeHg production capability is not universal in the Desulfovibrio is not differences in Hg affinity for cells nor differences in the ability of strains to degrade MeHg. However, Hg methylation rates varied substantially between Hg-methylating Desulfovibrio species even in these controlled experiments and after normalization to cell density. Thus, biological differences may drive cross-species differences in Hg methylation rates. As part of this study, we identified four new Hg methylators (Desulfovibrio aespoeensis, D. alkalitolerans, D. psychrotolerans, and D. sulfodismutans) and four nonmethylating species (Desulfovibrio alcoholivorans, D. tunisiensis, D. carbinoliphilus, and D. piger) in our ongoing effort to generate a library of strains for Hg methylation genomics.

[1]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Role of morphological growth state and gene expression in Desulfovibrio africanus strain Walvis Bay mercury methylation. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  C. Gilmour,et al.  Dissolved organic matter enhances microbial mercury methylation under sulfidic conditions. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Ralph Turner,et al.  Contribution of coexisting sulfate and iron reducing bacteria to methylmercury production in freshwater river sediments. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  M. Deshusses,et al.  Methylation of mercury by bacteria exposed to dissolved, nanoparticulate, and microparticulate mercuric sulfides. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  E. O’Loughlin,et al.  Binding of HgII to high-affinity sites on bacteria inhibits reduction to Hg0 by mixed FeII/III phases. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  G. Aiken,et al.  Formation of nanocolloidal metacinnabar in mercury-DOM-sulfide systems. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Yanping Wang,et al.  Methanogens: principal methylators of mercury in lake periphyton. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  F. Morel,et al.  Active transport, substrate specificity, and methylation of Hg(II) in anaerobic bacteria , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  C. Schadt,et al.  Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a Model for Understanding Bacterial Mercury Methylation , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  R. Guyoneaud,et al.  Simultaneous determination of mercury methylation and demethylation capacities of various sulfate‐reducing bacteria using species‐specific isotopic tracers , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[11]  H. Hintelmann,et al.  Importance of sulfate reducing bacteria in mercury methylation and demethylation in periphyton from Bolivian Amazon region. , 2011, Chemosphere.

[12]  S. Brooks,et al.  Mercury and Other Heavy Metals Influence Bacterial Community Structure in Contaminated Tennessee Streams , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  C. Gilmour,et al.  Mercury and methylmercury cycling in sediments of the mid‐Atlantic continental shelf and slope , 2010 .

[14]  E. Boyd,et al.  A thermophilic bacterial origin and subsequent constraints by redox, light and salinity on the evolution of the microbial mercuric reductase. , 2010, Environmental microbiology.

[15]  Jeremy B. Fein,et al.  High- and low-affinity binding sites for Cd on the bacterial cell walls of Bacillus subtilis and Shewanella oneidensis , 2010 .

[16]  H. Hsu-Kim,et al.  Influence of amino acids cysteine and serine on aggregation kinetics of zinc and mercury sulfide colloids. , 2010, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[17]  C. Gilmour,et al.  Methylmercury production in sediments of Chesapeake Bay and the mid-Atlantic continental margin , 2009 .

[18]  A. Deonarine,et al.  Precipitation of mercuric sulfide nanoparticles in NOM-containing water: implications for the natural environment. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  F. Morel,et al.  High methylation rates of mercury bound to cysteine by Geobacter sulfurreducens , 2009 .

[20]  R. Duran,et al.  Overview of Mercury Methylation Capacities among Anaerobic Bacteria Including Representatives of the Sulphate-Reducers: Implications for Environmental Studies , 2009 .

[21]  E. Björn,et al.  Potential demethylation rate determinations in relation to concentrations of MeHg, Hg and pore water speciation of MeHg in contaminated sediments , 2008 .

[22]  C. Gilmour,et al.  Methylmercury production in a Chesapeake Bay salt marsh , 2008 .

[23]  P. Visscher,et al.  Organic matter and sulfide inhibit methylmercury production in sediments of New York/New Jersey Harbor , 2008 .

[24]  B. Branfireun,et al.  Spatial characteristics of net methylmercury production hot spots in peatlands. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Shiuh-Jen Jiang,et al.  Speciation analysis of mercury and lead in fish samples using liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[26]  E. Björn,et al.  Importance of dissolved neutral mercury sulfides for methyl mercury production in contaminated sediments. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  J. Vonk,et al.  Studies on the methylation of mercuric chloride by pure cultures of bacteria and fungi , 2007, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[28]  C. Gilmour,et al.  Mercury Methylation by Dissimilatory Iron-Reducing Bacteria , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[29]  D. Nelson,et al.  Mercury Methylation from Unexpected Sources: Molybdate-Inhibited Freshwater Sediments and an Iron-Reducing Bacterium , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  J. H. Tuttle,et al.  Anaerobic microbial methylation of inorganic tin in estuarine sediment slurries , 1987, Microbial Ecology.

[31]  Z. Mester,et al.  High-yield synthesis of milligram amounts of isotopically enriched methylmercury (CH3198HgCl) , 2004 .

[32]  C. Hammerschmidt,et al.  Geochemical controls on the production and distribution of methylmercury in near-shore marine sediments. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  M. Marvin-DiPasquale,et al.  Microbial mercury cycling in sediments of the San Francisco Bay-Delta , 2003 .

[34]  F. Morel,et al.  Mercury Methylation Independent of the Acetyl-Coenzyme A Pathway in Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[35]  H. Hintelmann,et al.  Determination of stable mercury isotopes by ICP/MS and their application in environmental studies. , 2002 .

[36]  C. Gilmour,et al.  Aspects of Bioavailability of Mercury for Methylation in Pure Cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3) , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[37]  C. Gilmour,et al.  The influence of sulfide on solid-phase mercury bioavailability for methylation by pure cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3). , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  C. Gilmour,et al.  Methyl-Mercury Degradation Pathways: A Comparison among Three Mercury-Impacted Ecosystems , 2000 .

[39]  M. Frischer,et al.  Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Methylate Mercury at Variable Rates in Pure Culture and in Marine Sediments , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[40]  Lisa B. Cleckner,et al.  Mercury methylation in periphyton of the Florida Everglades , 1999 .

[41]  C. Gilmour,et al.  Estimation of mercury‐sulfide speciation in sediment pore waters using octanol—water partitioning and implications for availability to methylating bacteria , 1999, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[42]  Nigel T. Roulet,et al.  In situ sulphate stimulation of mercury methylation in a boreal peatland: Toward a link between acid rain and methylmercury contamination in remote environments , 1999 .

[43]  R. Jahnke,et al.  Coupling mercury methylation rates to sulfate reduction rates in marine sediments , 1999 .

[44]  Andrew Heyes,et al.  Sulfide Controls on Mercury Speciation and Bioavailability to Methylating Bacteria in Sediment Pore Waters , 1999 .

[45]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[46]  G. A. Gill,et al.  Methylmercury concentrations and production rates across a trophic gradient in the northern Everglades , 1998 .

[47]  R. Bartha,et al.  Mercury Methylation and Demethylation in Anoxic Lake Sediments and by Strictly Anaerobic Bacteria , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[48]  J. Rudd,et al.  Production and Loss of Methylmercury and Loss of Total Mercury from Boreal Forest Catchments Containing Different Types of Wetlands , 1996 .

[49]  C. Gilmour,et al.  Methylmercury production in the anoxic hypolimnion of a Dimictic Seepage Lake , 1995 .

[50]  R. Bartha,et al.  Cobalamin-mediated mercury methylation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans LS , 1993, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[51]  Ralph Mitchell,et al.  Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments , 1992 .

[52]  M. Winfrey,et al.  Methylmercury Decomposition in Sediments and Bacterial Cultures: Involvement of Methanogens and Sulfate Reducers in Oxidative Demethylation , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[53]  E. A. Henry,et al.  Mercury methylation in aquatic systems affected by acid deposition. , 1991, Environmental pollution.

[54]  M. Winfrey,et al.  Environmental factors affecting the formation of methylmercury in low pH lakes , 1990 .

[55]  R. Bartha,et al.  Carbon Flow in Mercury Biomethylation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[56]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[57]  R. Bartha,et al.  Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: Principal Methylators of Mercury in Anoxic Estuarine Sediment , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[58]  E. Arnold,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 16th ed. , 1985 .

[59]  N. Imura,et al.  Physiological role of mercury-methylation inClostridium cochlearium T-2C , 1982, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[60]  M. M. Bradford.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[61]  M. Hamdy,et al.  Formation of methyl mercury by bacteria. , 1975, Applied microbiology.

[62]  J. Wood,et al.  Synthesis of Methyl-mercury Compounds by Extracts of a Methanogenic Bacterium , 1968, Nature.