Citizen actuation for smart environments: Evaluating how humans can play a part in smart environments

Cisco defines the internet of everything (IoE) as the networked connection of people, processes, data, and things. This goes beyond the concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) of connected devices alone transforming the way people live their lives. It is through this combination of people, processes, data, and things that the future of many fields in computing (such as smart cities) can be realized. Smart environments are physical worlds interwoven with sensors, actuators, displays, and computational elements, embedded seamlessly into everyday objects and connected through a continuous network. A smart city/environment, by definition, needs a modern technological backbone but also relies on the natural resources of its inhabitants. The intersection of people, processes, and things is the area explored in this research. Things and people are combining to enable smart environments to become smarter, and smarter here is defined as optimizing/improving the environment's use of resources or the occupant's comfort. In parallel to research into the IoE, there is also a history of research into embedded systems, and this has evolved into cyber-physical systems (CPSs) and now cyber-physical social systems (CPSSs). The main difference between CPSs and IoT systems lies in the fact that IoT systems are aimed at interconnecting all the things in the physical world, while CPSs sense the physical world but are normally closed-loop systems.

[1]  Mark Weiser The computer for the 21st century , 1991 .

[2]  Edward A. Lee The Past, Present and Future of Cyber-Physical Systems: A Focus on Models , 2015, Sensors.

[3]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Gamification of citizen sensing through mobile social reporting , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Games Innovation Conference.

[4]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Closing the loop — From citizen sensing to citizen actuation , 2013, 2013 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST).

[5]  Sirajum Munir,et al.  Cyber Physical System Challenges for Human-in-the-Loop Control , 2013, Feedback Computing.

[6]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[7]  Katherine N. Irvine,et al.  Are people the problem or the solution? A critical look at the rise of the smart/intelligent building and the role of ICT enabled engagement. , 2013 .

[8]  马华东 Internet of Things: Objectives and Scientific Challenges , 2011 .

[9]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Leveraging Social Media and IoT to Bootstrap Smart Environments , 2014, Big Data and Internet of Things.

[10]  Wenji Mao,et al.  Cyber-Physical-Social Systems for Command and Control , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[11]  Insup Lee,et al.  Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution , 2010, Design Automation Conference.

[12]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Citizen Sensing, Social Signals, and Enriching Human Experience , 2009, IEEE Internet Computing.

[13]  Jaroslaw Domaszewicz,et al.  Soft Actuation: Smart Home and Office with Human-in-the-Loop , 2016, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[14]  J. Preece,et al.  User-Centered Design , 2004 .

[15]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  The Future of Human-in-the-Loop Cyber-Physical Systems , 2013, Computer.

[16]  Mark Weiser The computer for the 21st Century , 2002 .