Modeling Cyclist Violation Behavior at Signalized Intersection in China

To investigate the relationship between waiting duration and cyclist violation, cyclists' street-crossing behavior was examined by modeling the waiting duration at signalized intersections. Violation waiting duration was collected by video cameras and it was assigned as censored and uncensored data to distinguish between normal crossing and violating crossing. A proportional hazard-based duration model was introduced, and variables revealing personal characteristics and traffic conditions were defined as covariates to describe the effects of internal and external factors. Empirical results show that the street-crossing behavior of cyclists was time dependent. Cyclists' crossing behavior represented positive duration dependence that the longer the waiting time elapsed the more likely cyclists would end the wait soon. The violation inclination of most cyclists increased with the increasing waiting duration but about 55% of cyclists were at high risk of violation to cross the street. About 5% of all the cyclists can obey the traffic rules after waiting for 51 seconds. The human factors and external environment played an important role in cyclists' violation behavior. Minimizing the effects of unfavorable condition in traffic planning and designing may be an effective measure to enhance traffic safety.

[1]  Kevin J. Krizec Estimating the Economic Benefits of Bicycling and Bicycle Facilities: an Interpretive Review and Proposed Methods , 2007 .

[2]  William J. Horrey,et al.  Predicting adolescent pedestrians' behavioral intentions to follow the masses in risky crossing situations , 2010 .

[3]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Behavioural Issues in Pedestrian Speed Choice and Street Crossing Behaviour: A Review , 2008 .

[4]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Reduction in car-bicycle conflict at a road-cycle path intersection: Evidence of road user adaptation? , 2011 .

[5]  M. Hamed Analysis of pedestrians’ behavior at pedestrian crossings , 2001 .

[6]  Younshik Chung,et al.  Development of an accident duration prediction model on the Korean Freeway Systems. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  K Pfeffer,et al.  Adult Pedestrian Behavior When Accompanying Children on the Route to School , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[8]  Tova Rosenbloom,et al.  For heaven’s sake follow the rules: pedestrians’ behavior in an ultra-orthodox and a non-orthodox city , 2004 .

[9]  Tianjun Feng,et al.  Research on bicycle conversion factors , 2008 .

[10]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  A Latent Class Accelerated Hazard Model of Activity Episode Durations , 2007 .

[11]  George Yannis,et al.  A critical assessment of pedestrian behaviour models , 2009 .

[12]  Margaret O'Mahony,et al.  Modifying pedestrian behaviour , 2003 .

[13]  G. Tiwari,et al.  Survival analysis: Pedestrian risk exposure at signalized intersections , 2007 .

[14]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[15]  Elisa T. Lee,et al.  Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[16]  C. Cherry,et al.  Electric Two-Wheelers in China , 2007 .

[17]  Stuart Newstead,et al.  Riding through red lights: the rate, characteristics and risk factors of non-compliant urban commuter cyclists. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Judith Lynne Charlton,et al.  Cyclists and red lights: a study of behaviour of commuter cyclists in Melbourne , 2008 .