Increased brain perfusion contrast with T2‐prepared intravoxel incoherent motion (T2prep IVIM) MRI

The feasibility to measure brain perfusion using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI has been reported recently with currently clinically available technology. The method is intrinsically local and quantitative, but is contaminated by partial volume effects with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Signal from CSF can be suppressed by a 180° inversion recovery (180°‐IR) magnetization preparation, but this also leads to strong suppression of blood and brain tissue signal. Here, we take advantage of the different T2 relaxations of blood and brain relative to CSF, and implement a T2‐prepared IVIM (T2prep IVIM) inversion recovery acquisition, which permits a recovery of between 43% and 57% of arterial and venous blood magnetization at excitation time compared with the theoretical recovery of between 27% and 30% with a standard 180°‐IR. We acquired standard IVIM (IVIM), T2prep IVIM and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) images at 3 T using a 32‐multichannel receiver head coil in eight patients with known large high‐grade brain tumors. We compared the contrast and contrast‐to‐noise ratio obtained in the corresponding cerebral blood volume images quantitatively, as well as subjectively by two neuroradiologists. Our findings suggest that quantitative cerebral blood volume contrast and contrast‐to‐noise ratio, as well as subjective lesion detection, contrast quality and diagnostic confidence, are increased with T2prep IVIM relative to IVIM and DSC. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[2]  M. Bernstein,et al.  Measurements of T 1 Relaxation times at 3 . 0 T : Implications for clinical MRA , 2001 .

[3]  Peter C M van Zijl,et al.  Oxygenation and hematocrit dependence of transverse relaxation rates of blood at 3T , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Namkug Kim,et al.  Atypical imaging features of primary central nervous system lymphoma that mimics glioblastoma: utility of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 2014, Radiology.

[5]  M. Does Relaxation-selective magnetization preparation based on T1 and T2. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[6]  Bram Stieltjes,et al.  An in vivo verification of the intravoxel incoherent motion effect in diffusion‐weighted imaging of the abdomen , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Reto Meuli,et al.  Dependence of Brain Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Perfusion Parameters on the Cardiac Cycle , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Stefan Bluml,et al.  Visualization of cerebrospinal fluid movement with spin labeling at MR imaging: preliminary results in normal and pathophysiologic conditions. , 2008, Radiology.

[9]  J. Pearlman,et al.  CSF‐suppressed quantitative single‐shot diffusion imaging , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Tobias Kober,et al.  MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field , 2010, NeuroImage.

[11]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[12]  S. Holland,et al.  NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Chris A Clark,et al.  Combined Arterial Spin Labeling and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Noninvasive Estimation of Capillary Volume Fraction and Permeability-Surface Product in the Human Brain , 2013, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[14]  X Golay,et al.  Non-invasive Measurement of Perfusion: a Critical Review of Arterial Spin Labelling Techniques , 2022 .

[15]  J. E. Tanner,et al.  Spin diffusion measurements : spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient , 1965 .

[16]  Reto Meuli,et al.  Quantitative measurement of brain perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 2012, Radiology.

[17]  R. Dixon,et al.  The physics of proton NMR. , 1982, Medical physics.

[18]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Water proton T1 measurements in brain tissue at 7, 3, and 1.5T using IR-EPI, IR-TSE, and MPRAGE: results and optimization , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[19]  Linda Knutsson,et al.  Absolute quantification of perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: pitfalls and possibilities , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[20]  Peter R Luijten,et al.  High‐resolution magnetization‐prepared 3D‐FLAIR imaging at 7.0 Tesla , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  D. Gadian,et al.  Quantification of perfusion using bolus tracking MRI in stroke - Assumptions, limitations, and potential implications for clinical use , 2002 .

[22]  M. Bronskill,et al.  T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  B. Dimitrov,et al.  Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis - Diagnostic Strategies and Prognostic Models: A Review , 2012 .

[24]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Coronary Angiography with Magnetization‐Prepared T2 Contrast , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Namkug Kim,et al.  Histogram Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion for Differentiating Recurrent Tumor from Treatment Effect in Patients with Glioblastoma: Initial Clinical Experience , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[26]  R. Meuli,et al.  Functional Mapping of the Human Visual Cortex with Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  Julien Cohen-Adad,et al.  Improving diffusion MRI using simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging , 2012, NeuroImage.

[28]  Reto Meuli,et al.  Measuring brain perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM): Initial clinical experience , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  R M Weisskoff,et al.  Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[30]  R. Meuli,et al.  Perfusion Measurement in Brain Gliomas with Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[31]  Luisa Ciobanu,et al.  Characterization of Glioma Microcirculation and Tissue Features Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Rat Brain Model , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[32]  Xavier Golay,et al.  Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  J. Pekar,et al.  Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion. , 1990, Radiology.

[34]  Jeroen van der Grond,et al.  Model of the human vasculature for studying the influence of contrast injection speed on cerebral perfusion MRI , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  Robert Turner,et al.  The capillary network: a link between ivim and classical perfusion , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.