Coronary artery stretch versus deep injury in the development of in-stent neointima

Objective: To investigate the relative importance of stent induced arterial stretch and deep injury to the development of in-stent neointima. Setting: Normal porcine coronary arteries Methods: 30 BiodivYsio stents (Biocompatibles) were deployed at a stent to artery ratio of 1.25:1 (a moderate injury) and harvested at 28 days. Multiple serial cross sections were analysed morphometrically and the neointimal areas were correlated with the type and degree of injury. Results: Arterial stretch occurred in 78% of struts (77% of sections) and produced moderate neointimal growth (neointimal area 1.93 (0.13) mm2). Deep injury (rupture of the internal elastic lamina) occurred in 20% of struts (23% of sections) and produced a 1.7-fold increase in neointimal area (3.33 (0.41) mm2) compared with stretch only (p = 0.0002). With even deeper injury (rupture of the external elastic lamina), there was a 2.6-fold increase in neointimal area (5.01 (0.48) mm2) compared with stretch only (p = 0.02). A new injury score, incorporating both stretch and deep injury, correlated with neointimal area (r = 0.60, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Stretch of the coronary artery in a stent is common, and a major contributor to neointima formation, even in the absence of deep injury. Deep injury is, however, a more potent stimulus to neointima formation than stretch. Greater degrees of stretch are associated with thicker neointima. Where neither deep injury nor stretch are seen, the stent has no effect upon the development of neointima.

[1]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Robert S. Schwartz,et al.  Pigs, Dogs, Baboons, and Man: Lessons for Stenting from Animal Studies , 1994 .

[3]  C. Leeuwen,et al.  Modulation of Healthy Pig Coronary Arteries by Self‐Expanding Stents , 1996 .

[4]  B. Metzler,et al.  Signal transduction in arteriosclerosis: mechanical stress-activated MAP kinases in vascular smooth muscle cells (review). , 1998, International journal of molecular medicine.

[5]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Comparison of aggressive versus nonaggressive balloon dilatation for stent deployment on late loss and restenosis in native coronary arteries. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  P. Libby,et al.  Small Mechanical Strains Selectively Suppress Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Expression by Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells* , 1998, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  P D Verdouw,et al.  Increasing arterial wall injury after long-term implantation of two types of stent in a porcine coronary model. , 1998, European heart journal.

[8]  J. Gunn,et al.  Intravascular stents: a new technique for tissue processing for histology, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy , 1998, Heart.

[9]  C. Schulz,et al.  Experimental Results with a New Gold-Coated Multicellular Stent Design: Comparison with a Conventional Slotted Tube Stent in the Coronary Overstretch Model of the Pig , 1999 .

[10]  D. Baim,et al.  In vivo assessment of stent expansion and recoil in normal porcine coronary arteries: differential outcome by stent design. , 1999, Circulation.

[11]  E. Edelman,et al.  Balloon-artery interactions during stent placement: a finite element analysis approach to pressure, compliance, and stent design as contributors to vascular injury. , 1999, Circulation research.

[12]  P. Serruys,et al.  Reference chart derived from post-stent-implantation intravascular ultrasound predictors of 6-month expected restenosis on quantitative coronary angiography. , 1999, Circulation.

[13]  M. Leon,et al.  Tissue proliferation within and surrounding Palmaz-Schatz stents is dependent on the aggressiveness of stent implantation technique. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  R. Virmani,et al.  Stent design favorably influences the vascular response in normal porcine coronary arteries. , 1999, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[15]  C. Schulz,et al.  Coronary stent symmetry and vascular injury determine experimental restenosis , 2000, Heart.

[16]  M. S. Williams,et al.  Stent and artery geometry determine intimal thickening independent of arterial injury. , 2000, Circulation.

[17]  J. Gunn,et al.  Phosphorylcholine-coated stents in porcine coronary arteries: in vivo assessment of biocompatibility. , 2001, The Journal of invasive cardiology.