Agency in Natural and Artificial Systems

We analyze the conditions for agency in natural and artificial systems. In the case of basic (natural) autonomous systems, self-construction and activity in the environment are two aspects of the same organization, the distinction between which is entirely conceptual: their sensorimotor activities are metabolic, realized according to the same principles and through the same material transformations as those typical of internal processes (such as energy transduction). The two aspects begin to be distinguishable in a particular evolutionary trend, related to the size increase of some groups of organisms whose adaptive abilities depend on motility. Here a specialized system develops, which, in the sensorimotor aspect, is decoupled from the metabolic basis, although it remains dependent on it in the self-constructive aspect. This decoupling reveals a complexification of the organization. In the last section of the article this approach to natural agency is used to analyze artificial systems by posing two problems: whether it is possible to artificially build an organization similar to the natural, and whether this notion of agency can be grounded on different organizing principles.

[1]  K. Popper.  Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind , 1978 .

[2]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  Pedro Ruiz Mirazo.  Condiciones físicas para la aparición de sistemas autónomos con capacidades evolutivas abiertas , 2001 .

[4]  R. Brooks.  The relationship between matter and life , 2001, Nature.

[5]  Stuart R. Hameroff,et al.  Ultimate computing - biomolecular consciousness and nanotechnology , 1987 .

[6]  J. Bonner.  The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection , 1988 .

[7]  C. Ristau.  The Evolution of Culture in Animals, paperback edn, John Tyler Bonner. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1983), ix, +216. Price $9.95 (paperback) , 1984 .

[8]  P Arhem,et al.  On the coevolution of cognition and consciousness. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  K. Ruiz-Mirazo,et al.  Metabolism and the problem of its universalization. , 1999, Bio Systems.

[10]  Y Imae,et al.  Effect of viscosity on swimming by the lateral and polar flagella of Vibrio alginolyticus , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  P. Maes.  Modeling adaptive autonomous agents , 1993 .

[12]  Marina Basu.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2004 .

[13]  J. Mattick.  Challenging the dogma: the hidden layer of non-protein-coding RNAs in complex organisms. , 2003, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[14]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[15]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  Insect vision and olfaction: different neural architectures for different kinds of sensory signal? , 1994 .

[16]  A. Clark.  An embodied cognitive science? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Organismically-inspired robotics: homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop , 2003 .

[18]  J. Todd,et al.  INVESTIGATIONS , 1984, The Lancet.

[19]  Peter Atkins.  The Second Law , 1984 .

[20]  A. Clark.  Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[21]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Cells, Embryos and Evolution , 1997 .

[22]  Wolfgang Banzhaf,et al.  Evolving Control Metabolisms for a Robot , 2001, Artificial Life.

[23]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[24]  L. Buss,et al.  The evolution of individuality , 1987 .

[25]  A. Etxeberria.  Embodiment of Natural and Artificial Agents , 1998 .

[26]  W. Oechel,et al.  Automatic design and manufacture of robotic lifeforms , 2022 .

[27]  Steven Vogel,et al.  Life's Devices: The Physical World of Animals and Plants , 1988 .

[28]  J. Stock,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis , 2003, Current Biology.

[29]  Lars Risan,et al.  " Why are there so few biologists here ? " – Artificial Life as a theoretical biology of artistry , 2007 .

[30]  H. Maturana,et al.  De máquinas y seres vivos: Una teoría sobre la organización biológica , 1973 .

[31]  A. Damasio.  Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York (Grosset/Putnam) 1994. , 1994 .

[32]  John S. McCaskill,et al.  Artificial Evolution: creativity and the possible , 2000 .

[33]  Cleveland P. Hickman,et al.  Integrated Principles of Zoology , 1970 .

[34]  T. Smithers.  Autonomy in Robots and Other Agents , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  Francisco J. Varela.  Connaître : les sciences cognitives : tendances et perspectives , 1988 .

[36]  A. Damasio.  The feeling of what happens , 2001 .

[37]  A. Moreno,et al.  Cognition and Life: The Autonomy of Cognition , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[38]  F. Varela,et al.  Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  P. Simons,et al.  THE ROLE OF ELECTRICITY IN PLANT MOVEMENTS , 1981 .

[40]  K. Ruiz-Mirazo,et al.  A Universal Definition of Life: Autonomy and Open-Ended Evolution , 2004, Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere.