The Multiple Sclerosis Risk Sharing Scheme Monitoring Study – early results and lessons for the future

BackgroundRisk sharing schemes represent an innovative and important approach to the problems of rationing and achieving cost-effectiveness in high cost or controversial health interventions. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of risk sharing schemes, looking at long term clinical outcomes, to determine the price at which high cost treatments would be acceptable to the NHS.MethodsThis case study of the first NHS risk sharing scheme, a long term prospective cohort study of beta interferon and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in 71 specialist MS centres in UK NHS hospitals, recruited adults with relapsing forms of MS, meeting Association of British Neurologists (ABN) criteria for disease modifying therapy. Outcome measures were: success of recruitment and follow up over the first three years, analysis of baseline and initial follow up data and the prospect of estimating the long term cost-effectiveness of these treatments.ResultsCentres consented 5560 patients. Of the 4240 patients who had been in the study for a least one year, annual review data were available for 3730 (88.0%). Of the patients who had been in the study for at least two years and three years, subsequent annual review data were available for 2055 (78.5%) and 265 (71.8%) patients respectively. Baseline characteristics and a small but statistically significant progression of disease were similar to those reported in previous pivotal studies.ConclusionSuccessful recruitment, follow up and early data analysis suggest that risk sharing schemes should be able to deliver their objectives. However, important issues of analysis, and political and commercial conflicts of interest still need to be addressed.

[1]  L. Munari,et al.  Interferons in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis : a systematic review , 2022 .

[2]  P Lindgren,et al.  Costs and quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis in Europe , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[3]  W. Valdar,et al.  Sex ratio of multiple sclerosis in Canada: a longitudinal study , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[4]  C. Sudlow,et al.  Problems with UK government's risk sharing scheme for assessing drugs for multiple sclerosis , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  D. Paty,et al.  Disability progression in multiple sclerosis is slower than previously reported , 2006, Neurology.

[6]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[7]  X. Montalban,et al.  Defining the response to interferon‐β in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis patients , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[8]  J. Baskerville,et al.  The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 3. Multivariate analysis of predictive factors and models of outcome. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  J. Baskerville,et al.  The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 7. Progressive-relapsing and relapsing-progressive multiple sclerosis: a re-evaluation. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  J. Baskerville,et al.  The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 5. The clinical features and natural history of primary progressive multiple sclerosis. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Modelling the cost effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the management of multiple sclerosis. Commentary: evaluating disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis. , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.