Estimates of Aboveground Biomass from Texture Analysis of Landsat Imagery

Maps of forest biomass are important tools for managing natural resources and reporting terrestrial carbon stocks. Using the San Juan National Forest in Southwest Colorado as a case study, we evaluate regional biomass maps created using physical variables, spectral vegetation indices, and image textural analysis on Landsat TM imagery. We investigate eight gray level co-occurrence matrix based texture measures (mean, variance, homogeneity, contrast, dissimilarity, entropy, second moment and correlation) on four window sizes (3 × 3, 5 × 5, 7 × 7, 9 × 9) at four offsets ([1,0], [1,1], [0,1], [1,−1]) on four Landsat TM bands (2, 3, 4, and 5). The map with the highest prediction quality was created using three texture metrics calculated from Landsat Band 2 on a 3 × 3 window and an offset of [0,1]: entropy, mean and correlation; and one physical variable: slope. The correlation of predicted versus observed biomass values for our texture-based biomass map is r = 0.86, the Root Mean Square Error is 45.6 Mg∙ha−1, and the Coefficient of Variation of the Root Mean Square Error is 0.31. We find that models including image texture variables are more strongly correlated with biomass than models using only physical and spectral variables. Additionally, we suggest that the use of texture appears to better capture the magnitude and direction of biomass change following disturbance compared to spectral approaches. The biomass mapping methods we present here are widely applicable throughout the US, as they are based on publically available datasets and utilize relatively simple analytical routines.

[1]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[2]  John A. Richards Geometric Processing and Enhancement: Image Domain Techniques , 2013 .

[3]  James E. Hines,et al.  Estimating Annual Survival and Movement Rates of Adults within a Metapopulation of Roseate Terns , 1995 .

[4]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Forestry , 2000, Journal of Forestry.

[6]  M. D. Nelson,et al.  Mapping U.S. forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information , 2008 .

[7]  A. Huete,et al.  The use of vegetation indices in forested regions: issues of linearity and saturation , 1997, IGARSS'97. 1997 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings. Remote Sensing - A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development.

[8]  James A. Westfall,et al.  NACP Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Baseline Data, V.2 (NBCD 2000), U.S.A., 2000 , 2013 .

[9]  P. Chavez An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data , 1988 .

[10]  Kazuo Ouchi,et al.  Recent Trend and Advance of Synthetic Aperture Radar with Selected Topics , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[11]  David A Clausi An analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of grey level quantization , 2002 .

[12]  Andrew J. Lister,et al.  The status of accurately locating forest inventory and analysis plots using the Global Positioning System , 2007 .

[13]  P. Teillet,et al.  On the Slope-Aspect Correction of Multispectral Scanner Data , 1982 .

[14]  Richard A. Birdsey,et al.  Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species , 2004 .

[15]  D. Lu Aboveground biomass estimation using Landsat TM data in the Brazilian Amazon , 2005 .

[16]  S. Goetz,et al.  Mapping and monitoring carbon stocks with satellite observations: a comparison of methods , 2009, Carbon balance and management.

[17]  Thuy Le Toan,et al.  Relating forest biomass to SAR data , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Peter Z. Fulé,et al.  INITIAL CARBON, NITROGEN, AND PHOSPHORUS FLUXES FOLLOWING PONDEROSA PINE RESTORATION TREATMENTS , 2005 .

[19]  G. Foody,et al.  Estimating tropical forest biomass with a combination of SAR image texture and Landsat TM data: An assessment of predictions between regions , 2012 .

[20]  Sandra Eckert,et al.  Improved Forest Biomass and Carbon Estimations Using Texture Measures from WorldView-2 Satellite Data , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Chapter 5 Geometric Processing and Enhancement : Image Domain Techniques 5 , 2012 .

[22]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[23]  M. Dobson,et al.  The use of Imaging radars for ecological applications : A review , 1997 .

[24]  B. Markham,et al.  Summary of Current Radiometric Calibration Coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI Sensors , 2009 .

[25]  M. Batistella,et al.  Exploring TM Image Texture and its Relationships with Biomass Estimation in Rondônia, Brazilian Amazon. , 2005 .