Investigating the injury risk in frontal impacts of Formula Student cars: a computer-aided engineering analysis

This paper presents a parametric study of the injury risk in collisions of race cars designed for the European Formula Student competition. The study is motivated by the fact that only a limited assessment of driver safety is required for this competition. The approach was to model a Formula Student car in a mathematical dynamic model environment. A parametric study was then carried out to investigate the sensitivity of injury to various system variables. These were the crash pulse, the occupant stature, and the occupant posture. These system variables, under close examination, can be changed to alter the occupant kinematics or, in other words, they change the injury risk. The results of the analysis showed that the risk of injury in a frontal impact was dependent on the system variables. The risk of an abbreviated injury scale (AIS)2+ injury was 22.3 per cent in the baseline constant-g test, increasing to 35.2 per cent in the worst case. For AIS3+ the values were 5.1 per cent and 11 per cent, respectively. The study also showed that the occupant restraint conditions in a Formula Student car had a significant influence on the distribution of the injury risk between the body regions. The variation in the injury risk highlighted by this study, both in absolute terms and in the distribution between the body regions, showed that there are limitations to the use of vehicle kinematics in their current guise as a predictive tool for the injury risk. The results of this study represent a significant step in the understanding of the injury risk in a Formula Student frontal impact.

[1]  Stein E. Husher,et al.  CRASH PULSE MODELLING FOR VEHICLE SAFETY RESEARCH , 2003 .

[2]  M Preston RACE CAR SAFETY DEVELOPMENT , 1996 .

[3]  Douglas J Gabauer,et al.  Comparison of roadside crash injury metrics using event data recorders. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  The Position of the United States Delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 on the Use of HIC in the Automotive Environment , 1985 .

[5]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  LOWER EXTREMITY INJURIES AND ASSOCIATED INJURY CRITERIA , 2001 .

[6]  Abdel Magid Hamouda,et al.  Finite element lateral crash analysis of front natural gas vehicle platform with tank mounting structure , 2008 .

[7]  R A Zimmer,et al.  RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR THE SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HIGHWAY FEATURES , 1993 .

[8]  L Waagstroem STRUCTURAL ADAPTIVITY IN FRONTAL COLLISIONS. IMPACT ENERGY MANAGEMENT ADAPTED TO CRASH SEVERITY , 2004 .

[9]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Comparison of Roadside and Vehicle Crash Test Injury Criteria in Frontal Crash Tests , 2007 .

[10]  John W. Melvin,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Indy Race Car Crashes , 1998 .

[11]  Peter G. Wright The Analysis of Accident Data Recorder (ADR) Data in Formula 1 , 2000 .

[12]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanical Aspects of Blunt and Penentrating Head Injuries , 2005 .

[13]  Jason Kane,et al.  Analysis of a Frontal Impact of a Formula SAE Vehicle , 2006 .

[14]  Peter G. Wright The role of motorsport safety , 1998 .

[15]  John W. Melvin,et al.  Crash Recorders in Racing – An Overview , 2008 .

[16]  D. P. V. Weerappuli,et al.  Predicting the Response of a CART Car Driver in a Crash Using Mathematical Modeling , 1998 .

[17]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[18]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Human cadaver and Hybrid III responses to axial impacts of the femur , 1990 .

[19]  John W. Melvin,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Crash-Induced Dynamic Loads on Race Car Drivers , 2002 .