Determining Follow-Up Imaging Study Using Radiology Reports

Radiology reports often contain follow-up imaging recommendations. Failure to comply with these recommendations in a timely manner can lead to delayed treatment, poor patient outcomes, complications, unnecessary testing, lost revenue, and legal liability. The objective of this study was to develop a scalable approach to automatically identify the completion of a follow-up imaging study recommended by a radiologist in a preceding report. We selected imaging-reports containing 559 follow-up imaging recommendations and all subsequent reports from a multi-hospital academic practice. Three radiologists identified appropriate follow-up examinations among the subsequent reports for the same patient, if any, to establish a ground-truth dataset. We then trained an Extremely Randomized Trees that uses recommendation attributes, study meta-data and text similarity of the radiology reports to determine the most likely follow-up examination for a preceding recommendation. Pairwise inter-annotator F-score ranged from 0.853 to 0.868; the corresponding F-score of the classifier in identifying follow-up exams was 0.807. Our study describes a methodology to automatically determine the most likely follow-up exam after a follow-up imaging recommendation. The accuracy of the algorithm suggests that automated methods can be integrated into a follow-up management application to improve adherence to follow-up imaging recommendations. Radiology administrators could use such a system to monitor follow-up compliance rates and proactively send reminders to primary care providers and/or patients to improve adherence.

[1]  Fei Xia,et al.  Automatic identification of critical follow-up recommendation sentences in radiology reports. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[2]  Justin Dickerson,et al.  Follow-up of incidental pulmonary nodules and the radiology report. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[3]  James H Thrall,et al.  Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations. , 2009, Radiology.

[4]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal imaging results and radiologists' recommendations. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[5]  Alexander Norbash,et al.  Safety-Net Academic Hospital Experience in Following Up Noncritical Yet Potentially Significant Radiologist Recommendations. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Yuechen Qian,et al.  Follow-up Recommendation Detection on Radiology Reports with Incidental Pulmonary Nodules , 2015, MedInfo.

[7]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  Assessment of follow-up completeness and notification preferences for imaging findings of possible cancer: what happens after radiologists submit their reports? , 2014, Academic radiology.

[8]  Pragya A. Dang,et al.  Extraction of recommendation features in radiology with natural language processing: exploratory study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  José L. V. Mejino,et al.  A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[10]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  A Comparison of Vector-based Representations for Semantic Composition , 2012, EMNLP.

[11]  Pierre Geurts,et al.  Extremely randomized trees , 2006, Machine Learning.

[12]  Charles E Kahn,et al.  Actionable findings and the role of IT support: report of the ACR Actionable Reporting Work Group. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[13]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.

[14]  Thusitha De Silva Mabotuwana,et al.  Extracting Follow-Up Recommendations and Associated Anatomy from Radiology Reports , 2017, MedInfo.

[15]  Sayon Dutta,et al.  Automated detection using natural language processing of radiologists recommendations for additional imaging of incidental findings. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[16]  Christopher S. Hall,et al.  Determining Adherence to Follow-up Imaging Recommendations. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[17]  Darco Lalevic,et al.  Implementation of an Automated Radiology Recommendation-Tracking Engine for Abdominal Imaging Findings of Possible Cancer. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[18]  Michal E. Kulon Lost to Follow-Up : Automated Detection of Patients Who Missed Follow-Ups Which Were Recommended on Radiology Reports , 2016 .