Toward a Value for Guided Rafting on Southern Rivers

Abstract This study examines per trip consumer surplus associated with guided Whitewater rafting on two southern rivers. First, household recreation demand functions are estimated based on the individual travel cost model using truncated count data regression methods and alternative price specifications. Findings show mean per trip consumer surplus point estimates between $89 and $286, depending on modeling assumptions and river quality. Magnitudes of these surpluses are very dependent on assumptions about the opportunity cost of time.

[1]  Michael Creel,et al.  Theoretical and Empirical Advantages of Truncated Count Data Estimators for Analysis of Deer Hunting in California , 1990 .

[2]  V. Smith,et al.  Taking Stock of Progress with Travel Cost Recreation Demand Methods: Theory and Implementation , 1989, Marine Resource Economics.

[3]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Valuing Time in Travel Cost Demand Analysis: An Empirical Investigation , 1995 .

[4]  Frank A. Ward,et al.  Economics of water allocation to instream uses in a fully appropriated river basin: Evidence from a New Mexico wild river , 1987 .

[5]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies. , 1993 .

[6]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  The travel cost model of recreation demand: theoretical and empirical issues. , 1990 .

[7]  D. Parker,et al.  Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies , 1994 .

[8]  H. K. Cordell,et al.  Estimating Revenue-Capture Potential Associated With Public Area Recreation , 1994 .

[9]  D. Epp,et al.  The Importance of Sample Discrimination in Using the Travel Cost Method to Estimate the Benefits of Improved Water Quality , 1984 .

[10]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Statistical Properties of Welfare Measures from Count-Data Models of Recreation Demand , 1993 .

[11]  Alan Randall,et al.  A Difficulty with the Travel Cost Method , 1994 .

[12]  Larry D. Sanders,et al.  Comparable estimates of the recreational value of rivers , 1991 .

[13]  Daniel Hellerstein,et al.  Using Count Data Models in Travel Cost Analysis with Aggregate Data , 1991 .

[14]  John B. Loomis,et al.  The Travel Cost Demand Model as an Environmental Policy Assessment Tool: A Review of Literature , 1986 .

[15]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Functional Form and the Statistical Properties of Welfare Measures , 1994 .

[16]  Kenneth E. McConnell,et al.  Model building and judgment: Implications for benefit transfers with travel cost models , 1992 .

[17]  D. A. King,et al.  The lack of an expected relationship between travel cost and contingent value estimates of forest recreation value. , 1990 .

[18]  J. M. Bowker,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF WHITEWATER RAFTING CONSUMERS SURPLUS TO PECUNIARY TRAVEL COST SPECIFICATIONS , 1996 .

[19]  John C. Bergstrom,et al.  An Analysis of the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation in the United States. , 1991 .

[20]  Jeffrey Englin,et al.  Estimating Social Welfare Using Count Data Models: An Application to Long-Run Recreation Demand under Conditions of Endogenous Stratification and Truncation , 1995 .

[21]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Methods for Estimating Environmental Benefits , 1986 .

[22]  J. Boyce,et al.  Economic Valuation of the Chinook Salmon Sport Fishery of the Gulkana River, Alaska, under Current and Alternate Management Plans , 1996 .

[23]  D. Shaw,et al.  On-site samples' regression : Problems of non-negative integers, truncation, and endogenous stratification , 1988 .

[24]  Gardner M. Brown,et al.  The hedonic travel cost method. , 1984 .