Factors influencing periphyton growth in agricultural streams of central Illinois

Factors limiting periphyton accrual in east-central Illinois agricultural streams were investigated. Nutrient-diffusing substrata were used to examine periphyton macronutrient limitation in streams in two agricultural watersheds. Substrata consisted of sand-agar mixtures with one of six experimental treatments. Macronutrients included carbon, nitrate, phosphate and combinations of the three. Substrata were collected after a 5 and 9 day period and analyzed for chlorophyll a. None of the treatments were significantly greater than the controls at any of the seven stations, thus we conclude that periphyton in these streams was not nutrient limited. Highest periphyton colonization/growth rates were associated with the smaller upstream reaches, while lower rates occurred in the larger downstream reaches. Multiple regression showed that most of the variance in the rate of chlorophyll a accrual after five days was explained through water temperature and turbidity (r2 = 0.91); whereas, stream nitrate and phosphate concentrations accounted for no significant portion of the variance. We conclude that instream primary production in agricultural streams of central Illinois is limited by temperature and light.

[1]  S. Gregory.  Effects of light, nutrients, and grazing on periphyton communities in streams , 1980 .

[2]  W. Richardson,et al.  Algal Periphyton Growth on Nutrient‐Diffusing Substrates: An in situ Bioassay , 1985 .

[3]  J. Webster,et al.  Periphyton Response to Nutrient Manipulation in Streams Draining Clearcut and Forested Watersheds , 1986, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[4]  C. Goldman,et al.  In situ nutrient assays of periphyton growth in a lowland Costa Rican stream , 1986, Hydrobiologia.

[5]  John C. Wright,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY STUDIES ON THE MADISON RIVER, YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK1 , 1967 .

[6]  R. Lowe,et al.  Artificial substrates which release nutrients: Effects on periphyton and invertebrate succession , 1984, Hydrobiologia.

[7]  J. Stockner,et al.  Enhancement of Autotrophic Production by Nutrient Addition in a Coastal Rainforest Stream on Vancouver Island , 1978 .

[8]  C. Pringle,et al.  An In Situ Substratum Fertilization Technique: Diatom Colonization on Nutrient-Enriched, Sand Substrata , 1984 .

[9]  C. E. Warren,et al.  Primary Production in Laboratory Streams 1,2 , 1964 .

[10]  M. Dickman.  Changes in Periphytic Algae Following Bicarbonate Additions to a Small Stream , 1973 .

[11]  S. Fisher,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in hot desert streams of Southwestern U.S.A. , 1981, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  L. R. Mur,et al.  Assessment of factors limiting growth rate of Oscillatoria agardhii in hypertrophic Lake Wolderwijd, 1978, by use of physiological indicators1 , 1982 .

[13]  C. Pringle.  Effects of Water and Substratum Nutrient Supplies on Lotic Periphyton Growth: An Integrated Bioassay , 1987 .

[14]  R. Bachmann,et al.  Nutrients and algae in some central Iowa streams. , 1975, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation.

[15]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[16]  H. Maccrimmon,et al.  Assessing Changes in Biomass of Riverbed Periphyton , 1978 .

[17]  J. Hobbie,et al.  A continuous‐flow periphyton bioassay: Tests of nutrient limitation in a tundra stream1 , 1983 .

[18]  J. Newbold,et al.  The Limiting Role of Phosphorus in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: Effects of P Enrichment on Leaf Decomposition and Primary Producers , 1981 .

[19]  Michael J. Wiley,et al.  Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed , 1988 .

[20]  J. W. Moore.  Some factors effecting algal densities in a eutrophic farmland stream , 1977, Oecologia.

[21]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[22]  Kilkus Sp,et al.  Nutrients and algae in some central Iowa streams. , 1975 .