Not a melting pot: Plant species aggregate in their non‐native range

AIM: Plant species continue to be moved outside of their native range by human activities. Here, we aim to determine whether, once introduced, plants assimilate into native communities or whether they aggregate, thus forming mosaics of native‐ and alien‐rich communities. Alien species might aggregate in their non‐native range owing to shared habitat preferences, such as their tendency to establish in high‐biomass, species‐poor areas. LOCATION: Twenty‐two herbaceous grasslands in 14 countries, mainly in the temperate zone. TIME PERIOD: 2012–2016. MAJOR TAXA STUDIED: Plants. METHODS: We used a globally coordinated survey. Within this survey, we found 46 plant species, predominantly from Eurasia, for which we had co‐occurrence data in their native and non‐native ranges. We tested for differences in co‐occurrence patterns of 46 species between their native (home) and non‐native (away) range. We also tested whether species had similar habitat preferences, by testing for differences in total biomass and species richness of the patches that species occupy in their native and non‐native ranges. RESULTS: We found the same species to show different patterns of association depending on whether they were in their native or non‐native range. Alien species were negatively associated with native species; instead, they aggregated with other alien species in species‐poor, high‐biomass communities in their non‐native range compared with their native range. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: The strong differences between the native (home) and non‐native (away) range in species co‐occurrence patterns are evidence that the way in which species associate with resident communities in their non‐native range is not species dependent, but is instead a property of being away from their native range. These results thus highlight that species might undergo important ecological changes when introduced away from their native range. Overall, we show origin‐dependent associations that result in novel communities, in which alien‐rich patches exist within a mosaic of native‐dominated communities.

[1]  Margaret Kosmala,et al.  Traits linked with species invasiveness and community invasibility vary with time, stage and indicator of invasion in a long-term grassland experiment. , 2019, Ecology letters.

[2]  O. Eriksson,et al.  The Neolithic Plant Invasion Hypothesis: the role of preadaptation and disturbance in grassland invasion. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[3]  Inderjit,et al.  Inhibitory effects of Eucalyptus globulus on understorey plant growth and species richness are greater in non‐native regions , 2017, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[4]  Grass and forbs respond differently to nitrogen addition: a meta-analysis of global grassland ecosystems , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[5]  J. Barney,et al.  Climatic niche shifts are common in introduced plants , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[6]  Martin A. Nuñez,et al.  Invasive non-native plants have a greater effect on neighbouring natives than other non-natives , 2016, Nature Plants.

[7]  Y. Buckley,et al.  Does the biogeographic origin of species matter? Ecological effects of native and non‐native species and the use of origin to guide management , 2016 .

[8]  Jan Pergl,et al.  Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants , 2015, Nature.

[9]  Anke Jentsch,et al.  Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness , 2015, Science.

[10]  C. Thomas,et al.  Non-native plants add to the British flora without negative consequences for native diversity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Martin A. Nuñez,et al.  Negative, neutral, and positive interactions among nonnative plants: patterns, processes, and management implications , 2015, Global change biology.

[12]  P. Hulme,et al.  Alien and native plant species play different roles in plant community structure , 2015 .

[13]  L. Fraser,et al.  What drives plant species diversity? A global distributed test of the unimodal relationship between herbaceous species richness and plant biomass , 2014 .

[14]  G. Houseman,et al.  Conyza canadensis suppresses plant diversity in its nonnative ranges but not at home: a transcontinental comparison. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[15]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts , 2014, PLoS biology.

[16]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[17]  Martin A. Nuñez,et al.  Current mismatch between research and conservation efforts: The need to study co-occurring invasive plant species , 2013 .

[18]  Jan Pergl,et al.  Bias and error in understanding plant invasion impacts. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  Roy Turkington,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Coordinated distributed experiments : an emerging tool for testing global hypotheses in ecology and environmental science , 2012 .

[20]  J. Aronson,et al.  Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  K. Shea,et al.  Invasional interference due to similar inter- and intraspecific competition between invaders may affect management. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  Jan Pergl,et al.  A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment , 2012, Global Change Biology.

[23]  J. Maron,et al.  Escape from competition: neighbors reduce Centaurea stoebe performance at home but not away. , 2011, Ecology.

[24]  M. Vilà,et al.  Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[25]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  Abundance of introduced species at home predicts abundance away in herbaceous communities. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[26]  M. Fischer,et al.  Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. , 2010, Ecology Letters.

[27]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  D. Pearson,et al.  Effects of Picloram Application on Community Dominants Vary With Initial Levels of Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea stoebe) Invasion , 2010, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[29]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  B. Wilsey,et al.  Biodiversity maintenance mechanisms differ between native and novel exotic-dominated communities. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[31]  Xavier Font,et al.  Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe , 2008 .

[32]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? , 2008 .

[33]  T. Seastedt,et al.  Plant Community Response to the Decline of Diffuse Knapweed in a Colorado Grassland , 2007, Ecological Restoration.

[34]  C. D’Antonio,et al.  Mechanisms of resistance to invasion in a California grassland : the roles of competitor identity, resource availability, and environmental gradients , 2007 .

[35]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Propagule Pressure: A Null Model for Biological Invasions , 2006 .

[36]  D. Richardson,et al.  Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order , 2006 .

[37]  A. Agrawal,et al.  ENEMY RELEASE? AN EXPERIMENT WITH CONGENERIC PLANT PAIRS AND DIVERSE ABOVE- AND BELOWGROUND ENEMIES , 2005 .

[38]  J. Maron,et al.  A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range , 2005 .

[39]  B. von Holle,et al.  Facilitations between the Introduced Nitrogen-fixing Tree, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Nonnative Plant Species in the Glacial Outwash Upland Ecosystem of Cape Cod, MA , 2006, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[40]  P. Adler,et al.  A meta‐analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions , 2004 .

[41]  R. Callaway,et al.  Novel Weapons: Invasive Success and the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability , 2004 .

[42]  Mark Williamson,et al.  Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists , 2004 .

[43]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown? , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[44]  M. Crawley,et al.  Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis , 2002 .

[45]  C. J. West,et al.  Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions , 2000 .

[46]  K. Thompson,et al.  Plant dispersal: the role of man. , 1997 .

[47]  B. Blossey,et al.  Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis , 1995 .

[48]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change , 1992 .

[49]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Disturbance, Diversity, and Invasion: Implications for Conservation , 1992 .

[50]  James A. Drake,et al.  Biological invasions : a global perspective , 1989 .

[51]  P. Risser,et al.  Grassland Ecosystems of the World: Analysis of Grasslands and Their Uses (IBP 18) , 1980 .

[52]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Competitive Exclusion in Herbaceous Vegetation , 1973, Nature.