[Computer-aided reconstruction of the facial skeleton : Planning and implementation in clinical routine].

In computer-aided reconstruction of the facial skeleton, a workflow has been established involving the following steps: > diagnosis → planning and simulation → surgical procedure → validation and quality control <. In addition to clinical findings, the focus of diagnosis is on three-dimensional (3D) imaging, particularly computed tomography. Planning and simulation involves creation of a virtual model of the desired surgical outcome using special planning software. The accuracy of implant fit can be virtually verified before surgery. 3D models and virtual reconstructions can be used for manufacturing patient-specific implants. During the surgical procedure, planning must be transferred to the surgical site as accurately as possible. A number of techniques are available for this purpose, e. g., closed reduction, open reduction with the placement of anatomically preformed or patient-specific implants in combination with surgical guides, and the additional use of navigation. Validation and quality control require postprocedural 3D imaging. After reconstructions of the midface, 3D imaging should be performed even before surgery is completed. Malpositions can thus be directly corrected and unnecessary open reconstructions avoided. Mobile 3D c-arms are particularly useful for intraoperative 3D imaging. Whereas intraoperative imaging makes postoperative imaging after midface reconstruction unnecessary in many cases, postoperative 3D imaging in addition to intraoperative imaging may still be recommended after complex reconstructions of the facial skeleton.

[1]  Harald Essig,et al.  Precision of posttraumatic primary orbital reconstruction using individually bent titanium mesh with and without navigation: a retrospective study , 2013, Head & Face Medicine.

[2]  Alexander Schramm,et al.  Navigation-aided reconstruction of medial orbital wall and floor contour in cranio-maxillofacial reconstruction. , 2004, Injury.

[3]  Alexander Schramm,et al.  Navigational Surgery of the Facial Skeleton , 2006 .

[4]  Alexander Schramm,et al.  Navigational Maxillofacial Surgery Using Virtual Models , 2005, World journal of surgery.

[5]  Jayanthi Parthasarathy,et al.  3D modeling, custom implants and its future perspectives in craniofacial surgery , 2014, Annals of maxillofacial surgery.

[6]  M Kortesniemi,et al.  Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. , 2009, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[7]  F. Wilde,et al.  Intraoperative Imaging in Orbital and Midface Reconstruction , 2014, Facial Plastic Surgery.

[8]  Nils-Claudius Gellrich,et al.  Design and development of a virtual anatomic atlas of the human skull for automatic segmentation in computer-assisted surgery, preoperative planning, and navigation , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[9]  Harald Essig,et al.  Pre-operative planning for mandibular reconstruction - A full digital planning workflow resulting in a patient specific reconstruction , 2011, Head & neck oncology.

[10]  B. T. Kernan,et al.  Use of a stereolithography model for accurate, preoperative adaptation of a reconstruction plate. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  K. Lorenz,et al.  Intraoperative imaging with a 3D C-arm system after zygomatico-orbital complex fracture reduction. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  Jessica Brisco,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography for imaging orbital trauma--image quality and radiation dose compared with conventional multislice computed tomography. , 2014, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[13]  C Duzenli,et al.  Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  R. Bell,et al.  Computer-assisted planning, stereolithographic modeling, and intraoperative navigation for complex orbital reconstruction: a descriptive study in a preliminary cohort. , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[15]  R. Bell,et al.  Modern concepts in computer-assisted craniomaxillofacial reconstruction , 2011, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[16]  N. Gellrich,et al.  The value of computer-aided planning and intraoperative navigation in orbital reconstruction , 1999 .

[17]  M. Ivanovic,et al.  Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[18]  R. Schmelzeisen,et al.  Computer-assisted reconstruction of the facial skeleton. , 2003, Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery.

[19]  P. Manson,et al.  Toward CT‐Based Facial Fracture Treatment , 1990, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  F. Wilde,et al.  Die computergestützte Gesichtsschädelrekonstruktion , 2011, HNO (Berlin. Print).

[21]  J. Kruth,et al.  Selective laser melting of biocompatible metals for rapid manufacturing of medical parts , 2006 .

[22]  M. Heiland,et al.  Imaging of the Midfacial and Orbital Trauma , 2014, Facial Plastic Surgery.