A robust hazard ratio for general modeling of survival-times

Abstract Hazard ratios (HR) associated with the well-known proportional hazard Cox regression models are routinely used for measuring the impact of one factor of interest on a time-to-event outcome. However, if the underlying real model does not fit with the theoretical requirements, the interpretation of those HRs is not clear. We propose a new index, gHR, which generalizes the HR beyond the underlying survival model. We consider the case in which the study factor is a binary variable and we are interested in both the unadjusted and adjusted effect of this factor on a time-to-event variable, potentially, observed in a right-censored scenario. We propose non-parametric estimations for unadjusted gHR and semi-parametric regression-induced techniques for the adjusted case. The behavior of those estimators is studied in both large and finite sample situations. Monte Carlo simulations reveal that both estimators provide good approximations of their respective inferential targets. Data from the Health and Lifestyle Study are used for studying the relationship of the tobacco use and the age of death and illustrate the practical application of the proposed technique. gHR is a promising index which can help facilitate better understanding of the association of one study factor on a time-dependent outcome.

[1]  A. J. O’Malley,et al.  Summarizing causal differences in survival curves in the presence of unmeasured confounding , 2020, The international journal of biostatistics.

[2]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  Subtleties in the interpretation of hazard contrasts , 2020, Lifetime Data Analysis.

[3]  A. J. O’Malley,et al.  Time dependent hazard ratio estimation using instrumental variables without conditioning on an omitted covariate , 2019, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[4]  J. Ibrahim,et al.  Quantifying time-varying cause-specific hazard and subdistribution hazard ratios with competing risks data , 2019, Clinical trials.

[5]  J. McKendrick,et al.  Measuring Survival Benefit in Health Technology Assessment in the Presence of Nonproportional Hazards. , 2019, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[6]  J. De Neve,et al.  On the interpretation of the hazard ratio in Cox regression , 2019, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[7]  J. Cavanaugh,et al.  Partial Likelihood , 2018, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.

[8]  T. Mackenzie,et al.  Adjusting for bias introduced by instrumental variable estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model. , 2017, Biostatistics.

[9]  Pablo Martínez-Camblor,et al.  Fully non-parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation for random-effects meta-analysis , 2017, Statistical methods in medical research.

[10]  Norberto Corral,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic curve generalization for non-monotone relationships , 2017, Statistical methods in medical research.

[11]  Eugene Demidenko,et al.  The p-Value You Can’t Buy , 2016, The American statistician.

[12]  Joseph G Ibrahim,et al.  Quantifying the average of the time-varying hazard ratio via a class of transformations , 2014, Lifetime Data Analysis.

[13]  T. Tosteson,et al.  Using instrumental variables to estimate a Cox’s proportional hazards regression subject to additive confounding , 2014, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[14]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[15]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  On collapsibility and confounding bias in Cox and Aalen regression models , 2013, Lifetime data analysis.

[16]  D. Zeng,et al.  Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Short‐Term and Long‐Term Hazard Ratios with Right‐Censored Data , 2012, Biometrics.

[17]  Jeremiah R. Brown,et al.  Review of case-mix corrected survival curves. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  P. Martínez-Camblor Testing the equality among distribution functions from independent and right censored samples via Cramér–von Mises criterion , 2011 .

[19]  Ross L. Prentice,et al.  Semiparametric analysis of short-term and long-term hazard ratios with two-sample survival data , 2005 .

[20]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[21]  Sándor Csörgő,et al.  Universal Gaussian approximations under random censorship , 1996 .

[22]  J. Coresh,et al.  Adjusting survival curves for confounders: a review and a new method. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  Dorota M. Dabrowska,et al.  Uniform Consistency of the Kernel Conditional Kaplan-Meier Estimate , 1989 .

[24]  John D. Kalbfleisch,et al.  Misspecified proportional hazard models , 1986 .

[25]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[26]  O. Aalen Nonparametric Inference for a Family of Counting Processes , 1978 .

[27]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[28]  Carmen Cadarso-Suárez,et al.  Comparative study of ROC regression techniques - Applications for the computer-aided diagnostic system in breast cancer detection , 2011, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[29]  Winfried Stute,et al.  THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF KAPLAN-MEIER INTEGRALS * , 1995 .

[30]  Wenceslao González-Manteiga,et al.  Asymptotic properties of a generalized kaplan-meier estimator with some applications , 1994 .

[31]  Lee-Jen Wei,et al.  The accelerated failure time model: a useful alternative to the Cox regression model in survival analysis. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .