Identity disturbance in borderline personality disorder: an empirical investigation.

OBJECTIVE Identity disturbance is one of the nine criteria for borderline personality disorder in DSM-IV, yet the precise nature of this disturbance has received little empirical attention. This study examines 1) the extent to which identity disturbance is a single construct, 2) the extent to which it distinguishes patients with borderline personality disorder, and 3) the role of sexual abuse in identity disturbance in patients with borderline personality disorder. METHOD The authors constructed an instrument that consisted of 35 indicators of identity disturbance culled from relevant clinical and theoretical literature and asked clinicians to rate a patient on each of the items. The patient group consisted of 95 subjects diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (N=34), another personality disorder (N=20), or no personality disorder (N=41). Relevant diagnostic, demographic, and developmental history data were also collected. The authors used factor analysis to ascertain whether identity disturbance is a unitary construct and then examined the relation between dimensions of identity disturbance and borderline diagnosis after controlling for sexual abuse history. RESULTS Four identity disturbance factors were identified: role absorption (in which patients tend to define themselves in terms of a single role or cause), painful incoherence (a subjective sense of lack of coherence), inconsistency (an objective incoherence in thought, feeling, and behavior), and lack of commitment (e.g., to jobs or values). All four factors, but particularly painful incoherence, distinguished patients with borderline personality disorder. Although sexual abuse was associated with some of the identity factors, particularly painful incoherence, borderline pathology contributed unique variance beyond abuse history to all four identity disturbance factors. The data also provided further evidence for an emerging empirical distinction between two borderline personality disorder types: one defined by emotional dysregulation and dysphoria, the other by histrionic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Identity disturbance is a multifaceted construct that distinguishes patients with borderline personality disorder from other patients. Some of its components are related to a history of sexual abuse, whereas others are not. Identity disturbance appears to be characteristic of borderline patients whether or not they have an abuse history.

[1]  Drew Westen,et al.  Refining the Measurement of Axis II: A Q-Sort Procedure for Assessing Personality Pathology , 1998, Assessment.

[2]  M. Zanarini.  Role of sexual abuse in etiology of borderline personality disorder , 1997 .

[3]  D. Westen,et al.  Revising and assessing axis II, Part II: toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[4]  M. Cloitre,et al.  Relationship of dissociation to self-mutilation and childhood abuse in borderline personality disorder. , 1995, The American journal of psychiatry.

[5]  D. Fink,et al.  Rethinking the comparison of borderline personality disorder and multiple personality disorder. , 1994, Psychiatric Clinics of North America.

[6]  D. Westen,et al.  Childhood sexual and physical abuse in adult patients with borderline personality disorder. , 1990, The American journal of psychiatry.

[7]  H. Steele,et al.  The capacity for understanding mental states - the reflective self in parent and child and its significance for security of attachment , 1991 .

[8]  C. A. Ross,et al.  Structured interview data on 102 cases of multiple personality disorder from four centers. , 1990, The American journal of psychiatry.

[9]  E. Erikson.  Identity, youth, and crisis , 1968 .

[10]  M. Farley,et al.  Dissociation in an Outpatient Sample of Women Reporting Childhood Sexual Abuse , 1996, Psychological reports.

[11]  G. Adler,et al.  Definitive treatment of the borderline personality. , 1982, International journal of psychoanalytic psychotherapy.

[12]  Otto F. Kernberg,et al.  Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism , 1975 .

[13]  D. Westen.  The Cognitive Self and the Psychoanalytic Self: Can We Put Our Selves Together? , 1992 .

[14]  A. Waterman,et al.  Ego Identity: A Handbook for Psychosocial Research , 1993 .

[15]  P. Dell.  Axis II pathology in outpatients with dissociative identity disorder. , 1998, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[16]  H. Pincus,et al.  Practice-based research in psychiatry. , 1997, The American journal of psychiatry.

[17]  D. Westen,et al.  Revising and assessing axis II, Part I: developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[18]  V. Pollock,et al.  The Long-Term Sequelae of Childhood Sexual Abuse in Women: A Meta-Analytic Review , 1996 .

[19]  G. Adler,et al.  Aloneness and borderline psychopathology: the possible relevance of child development issues. , 1979, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[20]  P. De Boeck,et al.  Identity disturbances and self-other differentiation in schizophrenics, borderlines, and normal controls. , 1995, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[21]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[22]  J. B. Murray,et al.  Relationship of childhood sexual abuse to borderline personality disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and multiple personality disorder. , 1993, The Journal of psychology.

[23]  D. Westen,et al.  Physical and sexual abuse in adolescent girls with borderline personality disorder. , 1990, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[24]  Drew Westen,et al.  Self and Society: Narcissism, Collectivism, and the Development of Morals , 1985 .