Improving Supply-Chain-Management based on Semantically Enriched Risk Descriptions

To discover risk as early as possible is a major demand of today’s supply-chainrisk-management. This includes analysis of internal resources (e.g. ERP and CRM data) but also of external sources (e.g. entries in the Commercial Register and newspaper reports). It is not so much the problem of getting the information as to analyze and evaluate it near-term, cross-linked and forward-looking. In the APPRIS project an EarlyWarning-System (EWS) is developed applying semantic technologies, namely an enterprise ontology and an inference engine, for the assessment of procurement risks. The approach allows for integrating data from various information sources, of various information types (structured and unstructured), and information quality (assured facts, news); automatic identification, validation and quantification of risks and aggregation of assessment results on several granularity levels. For representation the graphical user interface of a project partner’s commercial supply-management-system is used. Motivating scenario is derived from three business project partners’ real requirements for an EWS with special reference to the downstream side of supply chain models, to suppliers’ company structures and single sourcing.

[1]  H. Lan,et al.  SWRL : A semantic Web rule language combining OWL and ruleML , 2004 .

[2]  Wang Kan,et al.  Designing knowledge chain networks in China — A proposal for a risk management system using linguistic decision making , 2010 .

[3]  Tonci Grubic,et al.  Supply chain ontology: Review, analysis and synthesis , 2010, Comput. Ind..

[4]  Birger P. Priddat Demokratisierung der Wissensgesellschaft und professioneller Staat , 2002, HMD Prax. Wirtsch..

[5]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Simulating organizations: computational models of institutions and groups , 1998 .

[6]  Frank Teuteberg,et al.  Semantic Technologies for Business and Information Systems Engineering: Concepts and Applications , 2011 .

[7]  Martin J. O'Connor,et al.  SQWRL: A Query Language for OWL , 2009, OWLED.

[8]  Emanuela Merelli,et al.  The Role of Content and Context in Enterprise Repositories , 2010, BPM 2010.

[9]  Joseph H. M. Tah,et al.  Towards a framework for project risk knowledge management in the construction supply chain , 2001 .

[10]  Hye Kyung Park,et al.  Virtual enterprise — Information system and networking solution , 1999 .

[11]  M. Fox,et al.  Enterprise Modeling , 1998, AI Mag..

[12]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  Enterprise ontology - theory and methodology , 2006 .

[13]  M. Fox,et al.  An Organization Ontology for Enterprise Modelling , 2002 .

[14]  Yu-Liang Chi,et al.  Rule-based ontological knowledge base for monitoring partners across supply networks , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  The Rule Engine for the Java Platform , 2008 .

[16]  Barbara Thönssen Turning Risks Into Opportunities. , 2012 .

[17]  E. Prud hommeaux,et al.  SPARQL query language for RDF , 2011 .

[18]  Walter W.C. Chung,et al.  Networked enterprise: A new business model for global sourcing , 2004 .

[19]  Michael Uschold,et al.  The Enterprise Ontology , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[20]  Barbara Thönssen An Enterprise Ontology Building the Bases for Automatic Metadata Generation , 2010, MTSR.

[21]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  The Ontological Foundation of REA Enterprise Information Systems , 2000 .

[22]  Michele Missikoff,et al.  An Approach to the Definition of a Core Enterprise Ontology: CEO , 2001 .

[23]  Barbara Thönssen,et al.  A broader view on Context Models to support Business Process Agility. , 2010 .

[24]  Mauri Leppänen,et al.  A Context-Based Enterprise Ontology , 2007, BIS.

[25]  R. A. Washington,et al.  A broader view. , 1991, Imprint.