Linking species functional roles to their network roles.

Species roles in ecological networks combine to generate their architecture, which contributes to their stability. Species trait diversity also affects ecosystem functioning and resilience, yet it remains unknown whether species' contributions to functional diversity relate to their network roles. Here, we use 21 empirical pollen transport networks to characterise this relationship. We found that, apart from a few abundant species, pollinators with original traits either had few interaction partners or interacted most frequently with a subset of these partners. This suggests that narrowing of interactions to a subset of the plant community accompanies pollinator niche specialisation, congruent with our hypothesised trade-off between having unique traits vs. being able to interact with many mutualist partners. Conversely, these effects were not detected in plants, potentially because key aspects of their flowering traits are conserved at a family level. Relating functional and network roles can provide further insight into mechanisms underlying ecosystem functioning.

[1]  Hugo Fort,et al.  Abundance and generalisation in mutualistic networks: solving the chicken-and-egg dilemma. , 2016, Ecology letters.

[2]  J. Lovett-Doust,et al.  Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties , 2002 .

[3]  L. M. Graves,et al.  What is a Functional , 1948 .

[4]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[5]  J. Gower A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its Properties , 1971 .

[6]  P. Legendre,et al.  A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. , 2010, Ecology.

[7]  J. Memmott,et al.  Functional group diversity increases with modularity in complex food webs , 2015, Nature Communications.

[8]  M. Emmerson,et al.  Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indices , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  The COMBREX Project: Design, Methodology, and Initial Results , 2013, PLoS biology.

[10]  B. Walker Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[11]  K. Barton MuMIn : multi-model inference, R package version 0.12.0 , 2009 .

[12]  Jason M Tylianakis,et al.  Specialization and Rarity Predict Nonrandom Loss of Interactions from Mutualist Networks , 2012, Science.

[13]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Pollination Syndromes and Floral Specialization , 2004 .

[14]  David Mouillot,et al.  Functional regularity: a neglected aspect of functional diversity , 2004, Oecologia.

[15]  A. Mooers,et al.  Pollinators visit related plant species across 29 plant–pollinator networks , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[16]  P. Jordano,et al.  Morphology predicts species' functional roles and their degree of specialization in plant–frugivore interactions , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  G. Pyke,et al.  Optimal foraging in bumblebees and coevolution with their plants , 2004, Oecologia.

[18]  H. Briggs,et al.  Single pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  J. Bosch,et al.  Plant-pollinator networks: adding the pollinator's perspective. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[21]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Universal resilience patterns in complex networks , 2016, Nature.

[22]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[23]  L. Buisson,et al.  Toward a loss of functional diversity in stream fish assemblages under climate change , 2013, Global change biology.

[24]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Trophic complementarity drives the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship in food webs. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[25]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  The dimensionality of ecological networks. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[26]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[27]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Rare Species Support Vulnerable Functions in High-Diversity Ecosystems , 2013, PLoS biology.

[28]  Ignasi Bartomeus,et al.  Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and bee-pollinated plants , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  D. Tilman,et al.  Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems , 1996, Nature.

[30]  B. Starzomski,et al.  What does biodiversity actually do? A review for managers and policy makers , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[31]  S. Cunningham,et al.  Pollen transport differs among bees and flies in a human‐modified landscape , 2011 .

[32]  N. Williams,et al.  Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[33]  L. Harder Behavioral responses by bumble bees to variation in pollen availability , 1990, Oecologia.

[34]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  Carol M. Frost,et al.  Complementarity and redundancy of interactions enhance attack rates and spatial stability in host-parasitoid food webs. , 2014, Ecology.

[36]  Colin Fontaine,et al.  Are insect pollinators more generalist than insect herbivores? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  How to be a specialist? Quantifying specialisation in pollination networks , 2011 .

[38]  Jessie A. Wells,et al.  Land-use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[39]  S. Potts,et al.  Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances , 2010 .

[40]  David Mouillot,et al.  A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant /flower visitor web , 2006 .

[42]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[43]  I. Bartomeus,et al.  The winners and losers of land use intensification: pollinator community disassembly is non‐random and alters functional diversity , 2014 .

[44]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[45]  Barry J Donovan Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) , 2007 .

[46]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[48]  F. Perfectti,et al.  Fitness consequences of centrality in mutualistic individual-based networks , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.