Validation of a Speed-Based Classification System Using Quantitative Measures of Walking Performance Poststroke

Background. For clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation, self-selected walking speed has been used to stratify persons to predict functional walking status and to define clinical meaningfulness of changes. However, this stratification was validated primarily using self-report questionnaires. Objective. This study aims to validate the speed-based classification system with quantitative measures of walking performance. Methods. A total of 59 individuals who had hemiparesis for more than 6 months after stroke participated in this study. Spatiotemporal and kinetic measures included the percentage of total propulsion generated by the paretic leg (Pp), the percentage of the stride length accounted for by the paretic leg step length (PSR), and the percentage of the gait cycle spent in paretic preswing (PPS). Additional measures included the synergy portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the average number of steps/day in the home and community measured with a step activity monitor. Participants were stratified by self-selected gait speed into 3 groups: household (<0.4 m/s), limited community (0.4-0.8 m/s), and community (>0.8 m/s) ambulators. Group differences were analyzed using a Kruskal—Wallis H test with rank sums test post hoc analyses. Results. Analyses demonstrated a main effect in all measures, but only steps/day and PPS demonstrated a significant difference between all 3 groups. Conclusions. Classifying individuals poststroke by self-selected walking speed is associated with home and community-based walking behavior as quantified by daily step counts. In addition, PPS distinguishes all 3 groups. Pp differentiates the moderate from the fast groups and may represent a contribution to mechanisms of increasing walking speed. Speed classification presents a useful yet simple mechanism to stratify subjects poststroke and may be mechanically linked to changes in PPS.

[1]  J. Hidler Robotic-assessment of walking in individuals with gait disorders , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  S. Simon,et al.  Gait Pattern in the Early Recovery Period after Stroke* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  John D Sorkin,et al.  Steps After Stroke: Capturing Ambulatory Recovery , 2005, Stroke.

[4]  U. Croce,et al.  A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[5]  Steven A Kautz,et al.  Key characteristics of walking correlate with bone density in individuals with chronic stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  BMC Neurology BioMed Central Study protocol Protocol for the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-stroke , 2007 .

[7]  S. Studenski,et al.  Physical Performance Measures in the Clinical Setting , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  Chitralakshmi K. Balasubramanian,et al.  Anterior-Posterior Ground Reaction Forces as a Measure of Paretic Leg Contribution in Hemiparetic Walking , 2006, Stroke.

[9]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Gait Changes in Older Adults: Predictors of Falls or Indicators of Fear? , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[11]  Gerald V. Smith,et al.  Microprocessor-based ambulatory activity monitoring in stroke patients. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  Jill Whitall,et al.  Improved Hemiparetic Muscle Activation in Treadmill versus Overground Walking , 2004, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  Chitralakshmi K. Balasubramanian,et al.  Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Emily Fox,et al.  Effects of Stroke Severity and Training Duration on Locomotor Recovery After Stroke: A Pilot Study , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  JoAnne K. Gronley,et al.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. , 1995, Stroke.

[16]  Chao Qian,et al.  Population , 1940, State Rankings 2020: A Statistical View of America.

[17]  John H Hollman,et al.  Agreement between the GAITRite walkway system and a stopwatch-footfall count method for measurement of temporal and spatial gait parameters. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful , 2007, Stroke.