论文信息 - A comparison of classification algorithms for Event Related Potentials

A comparison of classification algorithms for Event Related Potentials

We compare six methods for classifying low signal-to-noise Event Related Potential (ERP) data into deceiving and nondeceiving. Three methods perform poorly: Correlation Coefficient (CD), Support Vector Machine with linear Kernel (LSVM) and SVM with radial basis kernel (RBSVM), while another, Amplitude Difference (AD), performs satisfactorily. However, a simple by-individual weight template method performs better still.

Abdulmajeed Alsufyani | A. Alsufyani

[1] R. Blair,et al. An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[2] E Donchin,et al. The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[3] E Donchin,et al. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4] Misha Pavel,et al. A framework for rapid visual image search using single-trial brain evoked responses , 2011, Neurocomputing.

[5] Abdulmajeed Alsufyani. Detecting salient information using RSVP and the P3 : computational and EEG explorations , 2015 .

[6] Nello Cristianini,et al. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[7] Deniz Erdogmus,et al. A comparison of temporal windowing schemes for single-trial ERP detection , 2009, 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.