Mandibular distraction force: laboratory data and clinical correlation.

PURPOSE In vitro data were collected to measure torque-force values of an internal distraction device. The measurements were correlated with in vivo torque readings in an attempt to better understand the force required to distract the osteogenic bone callus of the human mandible during distraction osteogenesis. METHODS AND MATERIALS Five internal craniofacial distraction devices were mounted on an apparatus to test load limits and torque measurements. The apparatus aligned the devices so that weight provided a force opposite and parallel to the vector of distraction. Weights were added in 5-lb increments, and the devices were activated 0.5 mm for each torque reading. Torque readings were obtained from a calibrated torque wrench. Measurements were plotted on a graph and correlated with clinical torque readings obtained from 8 patients undergoing mandibular lengthening. RESULTS The average torque for distracting the human mandible 0.5 mm twice a day was 4.2 +/- 1.6 Newton-centimeters (N-cm). The average slope of the in vitro data shows that 4.2 N-cm of torque is equivalent to a force of 35.6 N. The average force of device failure was 235.8 N. CONCLUSION Torque-force diagrams offer an effective means for calibrating safety margins and load capabilities for internal distraction devices. Quantification of axial forces encountered in mandibular lengthening will help contribute to the overall understanding and biomechanics of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

[1]  C. Kunz,et al.  Manipulation of Callus after Linear Distraction: A “Lifeboat” or an Alternative to Multivectorial Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible? , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Controlled Multiplanar Distraction of the Mandible: Device Development and Clinical Application , 1998, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[3]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Vector of Device Placement and Trajectory of Mandibular Distraction , 1997, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[4]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  W. Tharanon,et al.  Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with multidirectional extraoral distraction device in hemifacial microsomia patients: three-dimensional treatment planning, prediction tracings, and case outcomes. , 1999, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[6]  M. Poole,et al.  Distraction Osteogenesis in Craniofacial Surgery: A Review , 1998, Annals of plastic surgery.

[7]  M. Vazquez,et al.  Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening: a technical innovation. , 1996, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[8]  W. Bell,et al.  Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. , 1999, Seminars in orthodontics.

[9]  M. Samchukov,et al.  The effect of sagittal orientation of the distractor on the biomechanics of mandibular lengthening. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  R. Aldegheri Distraction osteogenesis for lengthening of the tibia in patients who have limb-length discrepancy or short stature. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Submerged Intraoral Device for Mandibular Lengthening , 1998 .

[12]  J. Cordey,et al.  Force required for bone segment transport in the treatment of large bone defects using medullary nail fixation. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  P. Walker,et al.  In vivo distraction forces in extendible endoprosthetic replacement—a study of 34 patients , 1998, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[14]  J J Thomason,et al.  Force and stiffness changes during Ilizarov leg lengthening. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  R. Hollway Le Fort III advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices , 1998 .

[16]  M. B. Melugin,et al.  Orthodontic management of the patient undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis. , 1999, Seminars in orthodontics.

[17]  C. Cutting,et al.  Introduction of an intraoral bone-lengthening device. , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  W H Bell,et al.  Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis. , 1997, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[19]  S. R. Cohen,et al.  Craniofacial distraction with a modular internal distraction system: evolution of design and surgical techniques. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a ten-year experience. , 1999, Seminars in orthodontics.

[21]  J. Aronson Experimental and clinical experience with distraction osteogenesis. , 1994, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[22]  P. Dechow,et al.  Force level and strain patterns during bilateral mandibular osteodistraction. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[23]  Steven R. Cohen,et al.  Distraction Osteogenesis of the Human Craniofacial Skeleton: Initial Experience with a New Distraction System , 1995, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[24]  J. Kenwright,et al.  Force-displacement behaviour of biological tissue during distraction osteogenesis. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  M. B. Melugin,et al.  Orthodontic management of the patientundergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis , 1999 .

[26]  A. Figueroa,et al.  Biomechanical considerations in distraction of the osteotomized dentomaxillary complex. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[27]  R. Haug,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of distractors used for osteogenesis. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[28]  B. Toth,et al.  Le Fort III Advancement with Gradual Distraction Using Internal Devices , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[29]  A. Simpson,et al.  The forces which develop in the tissues during leg lengthening , 1996 .

[30]  M. Longaker,et al.  Angiogenesis during mandibular distraction osteogenesis. , 1999, Annals of plastic surgery.

[31]  D. Maull Review of devices for distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial complex. , 1999, Seminars in orthodontics.

[32]  L. Wolford,et al.  Biomechanics of mandibular distractor orientation: an animal model analysis. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[33]  T Romo,et al.  Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible using a submerged intraoral device: a report of three cases. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[34]  J. Aronson,et al.  Mechanical Induction of Osteogenesis: The Importance of Pin Rigidity , 1988, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[35]  D. Maull Review of devices for distractionosteogenesis of the craniofacial complex , 1999 .

[36]  J. McCarthy Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: Review of five cases , 1996 .

[37]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Bone Lengthening in the Craniofacial Skeleton , 1989, Annals of plastic surgery.