Experimental interval models for the robust Fault Detection of Aircraft Air Data Sensors

Abstract In this paper data-based approaches for a robust Fault Detection (FD) of the Air Data Sensors (ADS) including airspeed angles of attack and sideslip are proposed. Experimental Interval Models (IMs) have been considered for coping with modeling uncertainty and for providing interval estimations of the ADS signals. Specifically, a nonlinear-in-the-parameter Neural Network model has been introduced to characterize the nominal nonlinear response in the different phase of the flight, while model uncertainty is captured by an additional additive contribution provided by a linear in the parameters IM. The FD is achieved by verifying whether the measured ADS signals fall within time-varying bounds predicted by the nonlinear + IM. The IM identification has been formalized as a Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) problem using as cost function the mean amplitude of the prediction interval and, as optimization variables, the amplitudes of the uncertain parameters of the model. The model identification was based on multi flight experimental data of a P92 Tecnam aircraft. The proposed method is compared with conventional FD schemes with fixed thresholds. Extensive validation tests have been conducted by injecting artificially additive hard and incipient failures on the ADS. The FD scheme has shown to be remarkably robust in all phases of the flight in terms of low false alarm rates while maintaining desirable detectability to faults.

[1]  BLOCKED STATIC PORTS EYED IN AEROPERU 757 CRASH , 1996 .

[2]  James M. Lucas,et al.  Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: Properties and enhancements , 1990 .

[3]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  A Statistical Method for the Detection of Sensor Abrupt Faults in Aircraft Control Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[4]  Vicenç Puig,et al.  Limnimeter and rain gauge FDI in sewer networks using an interval parity equations based detection approach and an enhanced isolation scheme , 2013 .

[5]  Ligang Wu,et al.  Reliable Filter Design for Sensor Networks Using Type-2 Fuzzy Framework , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[6]  Marcello R. Napolitano,et al.  Aircraft model-independent airspeed estimation without pitot tube measurements , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[7]  Vicenç Puig,et al.  Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control using set-membership approaches: Application to real case studies , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Qiping Chu,et al.  Sensor fault detection and isolation for aircraft control systems by kinematic relations , 2014 .

[9]  Ruchuan Wang,et al.  Distributed Soft Fault Detection for Interval Type-2 Fuzzy-Model-Based Stochastic Systems With Wireless Sensor Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[10]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Bounding approaches to system identification , 1997 .

[11]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[12]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[13]  Josep Vehí,et al.  Fault detection and isolation of the three-tank system using the modal interval analysis , 2002 .

[14]  Elena Dubrova,et al.  Fault-Tolerant Design , 2013 .

[15]  G. Box,et al.  On a measure of lack of fit in time series models , 1978 .

[16]  J. P. Norton Overview of the Volume , 1996 .

[17]  Lars Imsland,et al.  Drillstring Washout Diagnosis Using Friction Estimation and Statistical Change Detection , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[18]  Qiang Chen,et al.  Computer intrusion detection through EWMA for autocorrelated and uncorrelated data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[19]  Peng Lu,et al.  Double-model adaptive fault detection and diagnosis applied to real flight data , 2015 .

[20]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Statistical Process Control , 2018 .

[21]  J. Farrell,et al.  Adaptive Approximation Based Control: Unifying Neural, Fuzzy and Traditional Adaptive Approximation Approaches (Adaptive and Learning Systems for Signal Processing, Communications and Control Series) , 2006 .

[22]  Vladimir Ivanovich T︠S︡urkov Large-Scale Optimization - Problems and Methods , 2001 .

[23]  M.L. Fravolini,et al.  Structural Analysis Approach for the Generation of Structured Residuals for Aircraft FDI , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[24]  Stéphane Ploix,et al.  Parameter uncertainty computation in static linear models , 1999, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304).

[25]  Damiano Rotondo,et al.  FDI and FTC of wind turbines using the interval observer approach and virtual actuators/sensors , 2014 .

[26]  J. Wellner,et al.  Empirical Processes with Applications to Statistics , 2009 .

[27]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  Model-based Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Design Schemes, Algorithms, and Tools , 2008 .

[28]  Paul M. Frank,et al.  Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy: A survey and some new results , 1990, Autom..

[29]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: a unified overview , 1995, Autom..

[30]  Silvio Simani,et al.  Differential geometry based active fault tolerant control for aircraft , 2014 .

[31]  Philippe Goupil,et al.  AIRBUS state of the art and practices on FDI and FTC in flight control system , 2011 .

[32]  Paul M. Frank,et al.  Issues of Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems , 2010, Springer London.

[33]  Andreas Varga Solving Fault Diagnosis Problems: Linear Synthesis Techniques , 2017 .

[34]  Jihoon Kim,et al.  Wind Estimation and Airspeed Calibration using a UAV with a Single-Antenna GPS Receiver and Pitot Tube , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[35]  Peter J Seiler,et al.  Air data system fault modeling and detection , 2013 .

[36]  Christopher Edwards,et al.  Fault tolerant flight control : a benchmark challenge , 2010 .

[37]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Process fault detection based on modeling and estimation methods - A survey , 1984, Autom..

[38]  O. Nelles Nonlinear System Identification: From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models , 2000 .

[39]  Umberto Papa,et al.  Data-Driven Schemes for Robust Fault Detection of Air Data System Sensors , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[40]  Vicenç Puig,et al.  Identification for passive robust fault detection using zonotope‐based set‐membership approaches , 2011 .

[41]  Silvio Simani,et al.  Model-based fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using identification techniques , 2003 .

[42]  Mogens Blanke,et al.  Diagnosis of Airspeed Measurement Faults for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[43]  Ben M. Chen Robust and H[∞] control , 2000 .

[44]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1967 .

[45]  Michèle Basseville,et al.  Detecting changes in signals and systems - A survey , 1988, Autom..

[46]  Eduardo F. Camacho,et al.  Bounded error identification of systems with time-varying parameters , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[47]  Stéphane Ploix,et al.  Causal fault detection and isolation based on a set-membership approach , 2004, Autom..

[48]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Some Statistical Process Control Methods for Autocorrelated Data , 1991 .

[49]  Janos Gertler,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems , 1998 .

[50]  Giuseppe Carlo Calafiore,et al.  Sparse identification of posynomial models , 2013, Autom..

[51]  Demoz Gebre-Egziabher,et al.  Synthetic Air Data System , 2013 .

[52]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  Data-driven Design of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-tolerant Control Systems , 2014 .

[53]  Giuseppe Carlo Calafiore,et al.  Interval predictor models: Identification and reliability , 2009, Autom..