Impedance characteristics of deep brain stimulation electrodes in vitro and in vivo

The objective of this study was to quantify the electrode-tissue interface impedance of electrodes used for deep brain stimulation (DBS). We measured the impedance of DBS electrodes using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in vitro in a carbonate- and phosphate-buffered saline solution and in vivo following acute implantation in the brain. The components of the impedance, including the series resistance (R(s)), the Faradaic resistance (R(f)) and the double layer capacitance (C(dl)), were estimated using an equivalent electrical circuit. Both R(f) and C(dl) decreased as the sinusoidal frequency was increased, but the ratio of the capacitive charge transfer to the Faradaic charge transfer was relatively insensitive to the change of frequency. R(f) decreased and C(dl) increased as the current density was increased, and above a critical current density the interface impedance became nonlinear. Thus, the magnitude of the interface impedance was strongly dependent on the intensity (pulse amplitude and duration) of stimulation. The temporal dependence and spatial non-uniformity of R(f) and C(dl) suggested that a distributed network, with each element of the network having dynamics tailored to a specific stimulus waveform, is required to describe adequately the impedance of the DBS electrode-tissue interface. Voltage transients to biphasic square current pulses were measured and suggested that the electrode-tissue interface did not operate in a linear range at clinically relevant current amplitudes, and that the assumption of the DBS electrode being ideally polarizable was not valid under clinical stimulating conditions.

[1]  B. Onaral,et al.  Linear and nonlinear properties of platinum electrode polarisation. Part 1: frequency dependence at very low frequencies , 1982, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[2]  D. Robinson,et al.  The electrical properties of metal microelectrodes , 1968 .

[3]  Jay T. Rubinstein,et al.  Current Density Profiles of Surface Mounted and Recessed Electrodes for Neural Prostheses , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  B. Conway,et al.  Determination of the Faradaic Impedance at Solid Electrodes and the Electrodeposition of Copper , 1958 .

[5]  D. McCreery,et al.  Morphologic changes after prolonged electrical stimulation of the cat's cortex at defined charge densities , 1983, Experimental Neurology.

[6]  J. G. Webster,et al.  Analysis and Control of the Current Distribution under Circular Dispersive Electrodes , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  D. McCreery,et al.  Histological evaluation of neural damage from electrical stimulation: considerations for the selection of parameters for clinical application. , 1981, Neurosurgery.

[8]  T L Babb,et al.  Tissue reactions to long-term electrical stimulation of the cerebellum in monkeys. , 1977, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  W. Grill,et al.  Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Anthony M. Dymond,et al.  Characteristics of the Metal-Tissue Interface of Stimulation Electrodes , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  B. Conway,et al.  Theory and Principles of Electrode Processes , 1965 .

[12]  Yoo,et al.  An electrochemical impedance measurement technique employing Fourier transform , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  J. Newman Current Distribution on a Rotating Disk below the Limiting Current , 1966 .

[14]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  L. A. Geddes,et al.  Historical evolution of circuit models for the electrode-electrolyte interface , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  E. Gileadi,et al.  Interfacial electrochemistry: An experimental approach , 1975 .

[18]  D. A. Ksienski,et al.  A minimum profile uniform current density electrode , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  L. A. Geddes,et al.  Electrical properties of metallic electrodes , 1990, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[20]  D. McCreery,et al.  Comparison of neural damage induced by electrical stimulation with faradaic and capacitor electrodes , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  L. A. Geddes,et al.  The impedance of a spherical monopolar electrode , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  L A Bullara,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the brain. II. Effects on the blood-brain barrier. , 1975, Surgical neurology.

[23]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  John Newman,et al.  Current distribution on a rotating sphere below the limiting current , 1974 .

[25]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of the Current-Density and Electric Field Generated by Metal Microelectrodes , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Bart Nuttin,et al.  Chronaxie calculated from current–duration and voltage–duration data , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  J. Randles Kinetics of rapid electrode reactions , 1947 .

[28]  H P Schwan,et al.  ELECTRODE POLARIZATION IMPEDANCE AND MEASUREMENTS IN BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS * , 1968, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  D.B. McCreery,et al.  Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Stuart F Cogan,et al.  Over-pulsing degrades activated iridium oxide films used for intracortical neural stimulation , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  Xuefeng F. Wei,et al.  Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.