Importance of the Task Visibility on KS-Reward Relationship: An Explorative Investigation

Knowledge sharing (KS) literature offers inconsistent findings on the moderating effects of employee’s exchange ideology (EI) on the relationship between organizational reward (ER) and employee’s KS behavior within organizations. This study contributes to the literature by examining how interaction effect of EI and individual perceived organizational reward depends on the organizational environment variable, i.e., knowledge sharing visibility (KSV). The data were collected from 159 respondents in an innovative service Chinese company. The results show that KSV×EI×ER had a significant interaction in the prediction of employee’s knowledge sharing behaviours in the organization. Specially, in the work environment of high KSV, the positive relationship between Reward and KS is stronger when the employee’s EI is higher. In the environment of low KSV, Reward is unrelated to KS regardless of the level of individuals’ EI. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in the end.

[1]  L. Witt,et al.  Equal Opportunity Perceptions and Job Attitudes , 1991 .

[2]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  P. Lynch,et al.  Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[5]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[6]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Social Loafing: Research Findings, Implications, and Future Directions , 1995 .

[7]  Chieh-Peng Lin To share or not to share: modeling knowledge sharing using exchange ideology as a moderator , 2007 .

[8]  Tung-Ching Lin,et al.  Understanding social loafing in knowledge contribution from the perspectives of justice and trust , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Robert Albanese,et al.  Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free-Riding Tendency , 1985 .

[10]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  R. Liden,et al.  Social Loafing: A Field Investigation , 2004 .

[12]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Measurement Issues in Cross-National Research , 1995 .

[13]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[15]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Vicious and Virtuous Circles in the Management of Knowledge: The Case of Infosys Technologies , 2005, MIS Q..

[16]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[17]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[18]  Eugene F. Stone Research methods in organizational behavior , 1978 .

[19]  Lois E. Tetrick,et al.  Social exchange and union commitment: a comparison of union instrumentality and union support perceptions , 1995 .

[20]  K. H. Price Decision responsibility, task responsibility, identifiability, and social loafing , 1987 .

[21]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived organizational support. , 1986 .

[22]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Tom Redman,et al.  Exchange ideology and member-union relationships: an evaluation of moderation effects. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  Andreas Riege,et al.  Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  Magnus Sverke,et al.  A new conceptualization of union commitment: Development and test of an integrated theory. , 1995 .

[26]  L. Witt,et al.  Exchange Ideology as a Moderator of Job Attitudes-Organizational Citizenship Behaviors Relationships1 , 1991 .

[27]  L. Kanuk,et al.  Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review , 1975 .

[28]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. , 1997 .

[29]  Christopher J. Hemingway,et al.  Making organisations virtual: the hidden cost of distributed teams , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[30]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[31]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[32]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[33]  J. George Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations , 1992 .

[34]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[35]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[36]  Gareth R. Jones Task Visibility, Free Riding, and Shirking: Explaining the Effect of Structure and Technology on Employee Behavior , 1984 .