Use of positron emission tomography to detect infection around antibiotic-loaded cement spacers in patients with high C-reactive protein levels.

In patients who have antibiotic-loaded cement hip spacers in the interim period, the correct diagnosis of infection eradication is the major determinant before reimplantation arthroplasty. Diagnosis is usually based on clinical findings and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. However, diagnosis can be challenging when the clinical findings are normal but the CRP level is high. From March 2007 to January 2008, fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was used to detect infection around antibiotic-loaded cement spacers in 13 patients (mean age, 60 years). Although patients' clinical conditions were deemed suitable for reimplantation, their serum CRP levels were persistently elevated (mean, 54 mg/L) an average of 120 days (range, 28-413 days) after the first-stage operation. Reimplantation total hip arthroplasty (THA) was subsequently performed in 7 patients based on the negative findings of FDG-PET. In 6 patients, FDG-PET was positive for infection. The persistence of infection was confirmed in 3 of these patients by another debridement surgery. Staged reimplantation THA was delayed in 1 patient who underwent repeat debridement and in 3 patients who were treated with extended periods of oral antibiotics. Of the 11 staged reimplantation THAs, only 1 reinfection was noted at an average follow-up of 48 months. The success rate of 91% suggests FDG-PET could help in the differential diagnosis of infection around cement spacers, especially in patients with normal clinical findings but elevated CRP levels.

[1]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Detection of periprosthetic infections with use of ribosomal RNA-based polymerase chain reaction. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  F. Haddad,et al.  Is There a Role for Tissue Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection? , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  S. Sporer,et al.  Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  A. Alavi,et al.  FDG-PET Imaging Can Diagnose Periprosthetic Infection of the Hip , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  R. Barrack,et al.  Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges? , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  P. Eysel,et al.  The implications of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: Results from a prospective, blinded study , 2006, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[9]  T. Cook,et al.  Ten-year experience using an articulating antibiotic cement hip spacer for the treatment of chronically infected total hip. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  Chuan-ju Liu,et al.  Serum interleukin-6 as a marker of periprosthetic infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  K. Bozic,et al.  The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Diagnostic values of positron emission tomography versus triple-phase bone scan in hip arthroplasty loosening , 2005, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[13]  U. Cremerius,et al.  Radionuclide imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty: positron-emission tomography versus triple-phase bone scanning. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  A. Alavi,et al.  Applications of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET imaging in the detection of infection and inflammation and other benign disorders. , 2005, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[15]  R. Uhl,et al.  Spacer endoprosthesis for the treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  Mel S. Lee,et al.  Two-stage revision hip arthroplasty for infection with a custom-made, antibiotic-loaded, cement prosthesis as an interim spacer. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Treatment of the infected hip replacement. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  A. Alavi,et al.  The importance of the location of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in periprosthetic infection in painful hip prostheses , 2002, Nuclear medicine communications.

[19]  R. Barrack Rush pin technique for temporary antibiotic-impregnated cement prosthesis for infected total hip arthroplasty. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  J. Insall,et al.  Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. 1983. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  C. Love,et al.  Role of nuclear medicine in diagnosis of the infected joint replacement. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[22]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Infection after total hip arthroplasty. Past, present, and future. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  W. Kraemer,et al.  Bone scan, gallium scan, and hip aspiration in the diagnosis of infected total hip arthroplasty. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  J. Insall,et al.  Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.