Gender and Interpersonal Task Behaviors: Status Expectation Accounts

In this paper we argue for the utility of status characteristics theory (Berger et al. 1977) in accounting for research concerned with gender differences in interpersonal task situations. We state and defend a basic status argument that differences in stereotypical gender task behaviors are a direct function of status differences or of attempts to cope with status differences. We show support for this argument in several areas of research: the influence, participation and performer evaluations of group members; their relative performance-reactor profiles; the relation of these behavioral profiles to the assignment of personality traits; the correlation of status position with the gender typing of tasks (i.e., male-identified, female-identified, or neutral); the relationship between gender status and salient information about other statuses; the role of expectations for rewards; and the emergence of mechanisms for coping with the implication of a low gender status position. We conclude that status characteristics theory can provide a set of interrelated explanations of the relationship of gender to interpersonal task behaviors.

[1]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Legitimacy, compliance, and gender in peer groups , 1995 .

[2]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Evaluations and the Formation of Expectations , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  V. Sadock.  The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States , 1995 .

[4]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  External Status, Legitimacy, and Compliance in Male and Female Groups , 1994 .

[5]  D. Buss.  The Evolution Of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating , 1994 .

[6]  E. Salas,et al.  Task Cues, Dominance Cues, and Influence in Task Groups , 1993 .

[7]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status characteristics theory: The growth of a program. , 1993 .

[8]  G. Gerber.  Instrumental and expressive personality traits in social cognition: parallels with social interaction , 1993 .

[9]  James C. Moore,et al.  Wage disparities and performance expectations , 1992 .

[10]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Status characteristics and expectation states theory: A priori model parameters and test* , 1992 .

[11]  M. Foschi.  Gender and Double Standards for Competence , 1992 .

[12]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Are Gender Differences Status Differences , 1992 .

[13]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Participation in Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Groups: A Theoretical Integration , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  J. W. Balkwell.  From Expectations to Behavior: An Improved Postulate for Expectation States Theory , 1991 .

[15]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Gender and the emergence of leaders : a meta-analysis , 1991 .

[16]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Gender, Language, and Influence , 2022 .

[17]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  What Is the Relationship Between Socioemotional Behavior and Status in Task Groups? , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  M. Heilman,et al.  Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. , 1989 .

[19]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Status Generalization: New Theory and Research. , 1989 .

[20]  Student.  HAS ANYTHING CHANGED? , 1989, Pediatrics.

[21]  Linda L. Carli.  Gender differences in interaction style and influence. , 1989 .

[22]  C. Keating,et al.  Power Displays Between Women and Men in Discussions of Gender-Linked Tasks: A Multichannel Study , 1988 .

[23]  Gender differences in task groups: A status and legitimacy account. , 1988 .

[24]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status, Rewards, and Influence: How Expectations Organize Behavior. , 1987 .

[25]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. , 1986 .

[26]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Status and Participation in Six-Person Groups: A Test of Skvoretz's Comparative Status Model , 1986 .

[27]  David G. Wagner,et al.  Can gender inequalities be reduced , 1986 .

[28]  W. Wood,et al.  TITLE Sex Differences in Interaction Style as a Product of Perceived Sex Differences in Competence , 2007 .

[29]  Allan Mazur,et al.  A Biosocial Model of Status in Face-to-Face Primate Groups , 1985 .

[30]  S. Snodgrass,et al.  Women's intuition: The effect of subordinate role on interpersonal sensitivity. , 1985 .

[31]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Nonverbal Cues and Status: An Expectation States Approach , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  F. Geis,et al.  Sex vs. status in sex-associated stereotypes , 1984 .

[33]  J. Berger,et al.  Do Status Interventions Persist , 1984 .

[34]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of sex-linked situations and sex composition on cooperation and style of interaction , 1983 .

[35]  J. E. Stake.  Situation and person‐centered approaches to promoting leadership behavior in low performance self‐esteem women , 1983 .

[36]  M. D. Pugh,et al.  Neutralizing Sexism in Mixed-Sex Groups: Do Women Have to Be Better Than Men? , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  J. Kelly,et al.  Gender and Sex Role Differences in Group Decision‐Making Social Interactions: A Behavioral Analysis1 , 1982 .

[38]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation. , 1982 .

[39]  J. E. Stake.  Promoting leadership behaviors in low performance‐self‐esteem women in task‐oriented mixed‐sex dyads1 , 1981 .

[40]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Theoretical Consequences of the Status Characteristics Formulation , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  H. Reis,et al.  Sex differences in reward allocation: Subjects, partners, and tasks. , 1981 .

[42]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Working papers in the theory of action , 1981 .

[43]  H. Lamm,et al.  Equity and Equality: Male and Female Means to a Just End , 1980 .

[44]  W. Harrod.  Expectations from Unequal Rewards , 1980 .

[45]  Arnold S. Kahn,et al.  Sex of subject and sex composition of the group as determinants of reward allocations. , 1980 .

[46]  L. Messé,et al.  Sex differences in the allocation of pay. , 1979 .

[47]  E. Cohen,et al.  An alternative perspective on sex differences in organizational settings: The process of legitimation , 1978 .

[48]  Guillermina Jasso,et al.  On the Justice of Earnings: A New Specification of the Justice Evaluation Function , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  James E. Driskell,et al.  STATUS GENERALIZATION: A REVIEW AND SOME NEW DATA* , 1978 .

[50]  P. Fishman,et al.  Interaction: The Work Women Do , 1978 .

[51]  J. Piliavin,et al.  The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction , 1978 .

[52]  R. R. Haccoun,et al.  Sex differences in the appropriateness of supervisory styles: A nonmanagement view. , 1978 .

[53]  E. Cohn,et al.  Secret ambitions and public performances: The effects of anonymity on reward allocations made by men and women , 1977 .

[54]  J. Berger.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach , 1976 .

[55]  M. Wiley,et al.  Sex composition and leadership in small groups. , 1976, Sociometry.

[56]  Marlaine E. Lockheed,et al.  Conceptualizing Sex as a Status Characteristic: Applications to Leadership Training Strategies , 1976 .

[57]  E. Aries,et al.  Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female, and Mixed Groups , 1976 .

[58]  K. A. Coney,et al.  Advertising and differentiated sex roles in contemporary American society , 1976 .

[59]  K. Cook.  EXPECTATIONS, EVALUATIONS AND EQUITY , 1975 .

[60]  P J Burke,et al.  Participation and leadership in small groups. , 1974, American sociological review.

[61]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Psychology of Sex Differences , 1974 .

[62]  P. Burke.  Task and social-emotional leadership role performance. , 1971, Sociometry.

[63]  B. Werble.  Outsiders Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. , 1966 .

[64]  M. Kuhn,et al.  Family, Socialization and Interaction Process , 1957, Pediatrics.

[65]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Sex Role Differentiation in Jury Deliberations , 1956 .

[66]  M. Zelditch,.  Role differentiation in the nuclear family: a comparative study , 1955 .