Optimal voltage stimulation parameters for network-mediated responses in wild type and rd10 mouse retinal ganglion cells

To further improve the quality of visual percepts elicited by microelectronic retinal prosthetics, substantial efforts have been made to understand how retinal neurons respond to electrical stimulation. It is generally assumed that a sufficiently strong stimulus will recruit most retinal neurons. However, recent evidence has shown that the responses of some retinal neurons decrease with excessively strong stimuli (a non-monotonic response function). Therefore, it is necessary to identify stimuli that can be used to activate the majority of retinal neurons even when such non-monotonic cells are part of the neuronal population. Taking these non-monotonic responses into consideration, we establish the optimal voltage stimulation parameters (amplitude, duration, and polarity) for epiretinal stimulation of network-mediated (indirect) ganglion cell responses. We recorded responses from 3958 mouse retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in both healthy (wild type, WT) and a degenerating (rd10) mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa-using flat-mounted retina on a microelectrode array. Rectangular monophasic voltage-controlled pulses were presented with varying voltage, duration, and polarity. We found that in 4-5 weeks old rd10 mice the RGC thresholds were comparable to those of WT. There was a marked response variability among mouse RGCs. To account for this variability, we interpolated the percentage of RGCs activated at each point in the voltage-polarity-duration stimulus space, thus identifying the optimal voltage-controlled pulse (-2.4 V, 0.88 ms). The identified optimal voltage pulse can activate at least 65% of potentially responsive RGCs in both mouse strains. Furthermore, this pulse is well within the range of stimuli demonstrated to be safe and effective for retinal implant patients. Such optimized stimuli and the underlying method used to identify them support a high yield of responsive RGCs and will serve as an effective guideline for future in vitro investigations of retinal electrostimulation by establishing standard stimuli for each unique experimental condition.

[1]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis system allows letter and word reading and long-term function in patients with profound vision loss , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[2]  Maesoon Im,et al.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  F. Müller,et al.  Correlations between ERG, OCT, and Anatomical Findings in the rd10 Mouse , 2014, Journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  D. J. Park,et al.  Degeneration stage-specific response pattern of retinal ganglion cell spikes in rd10 mouse retina , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[5]  F. Werblin,et al.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Inbar Brosh,et al.  Holographic optogenetic stimulation of patterned neuronal activity for vision restoration , 2013, Nature Communications.

[7]  N. Maccarthy,et al.  Monopolar vs. bipolar subretinal stimulation—An in vitro study , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Elena Ivanova,et al.  Block of Gap Junctions Eliminates Aberrant Activity and Restores Light Responses during Retinal Degeneration , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  H. Seung,et al.  Neuronal Cell Types and Connectivity: Lessons from the Retina , 2014, Neuron.

[10]  Michael R. Ibbotson,et al.  Epiretinal electrical stimulation and the inner limiting membrane in rat retina , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  David Tsai,et al.  Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  E. Zrenner,et al.  To what extent can retinal prostheses restore vision? , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[13]  M. Sahin,et al.  Charge Injection Capacity of TiN Electrodes for an Extended Voltage Range , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  Tatsuaki Tsuruyama,et al.  Changes in morphology and visual function over time in mouse models of retinal degeneration: an SD-OCT, histology, and electroretinography study , 2016, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[15]  C. Andressen,et al.  Subretinally Transplanted Embryonic Stem Cells Rescue Photoreceptor Cells from Degeneration in the RCS Rats , 2001, Cell transplantation.

[16]  J. Heckenlively,et al.  Two mouse retinal degenerations caused by missense mutations in the β-subunit of rod cGMP phosphodiesterase gene , 2007, Vision Research.

[17]  Maesoon Im,et al.  Indirect activation elicits strong correlations between light and electrical responses in ON but not OFF retinal ganglion cells , 2015, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  R. Masland Cell populations of the retina: the Proctor lecture. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  M. T. Davisson,et al.  Retinal degeneration mutants in the mouse , 2002, Vision Research.

[20]  J. Ye,et al.  Comparison of electrically-evoked ganglion cell responses in normal and degenerate retina , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  Matthias Bethge,et al.  The functional diversity of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse , 2015, Nature.

[22]  J. Weiland,et al.  Electrical Stimulation in Isolated Rabbit Retina , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  Michael B. Stadler,et al.  Gene expression changes within Müller glial cells in retinitis pigmentosa , 2012, Molecular vision.

[24]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[25]  J. Weiland,et al.  Retinal prosthesis. , 2014, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[26]  E. Strettoi,et al.  Retinal Ganglion Cells Survive and Maintain Normal Dendritic Morphology in a Mouse Model of Inherited Photoreceptor Degeneration , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Fried,et al.  Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Joseph F. Rizzo,et al.  Activation of retinal ganglion cells in wild-type and rd1 mice through electrical stimulation of the retinal neural network , 2008, Vision Research.

[30]  B. Sagdullaev,et al.  Network Deficiency Exacerbates Impairment in a Mouse Model of Retinal Degeneration , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[31]  H. Grossniklaus,et al.  Analysis of the RPE sheet in the rd10 retinal degeneration model. , 2012, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[32]  Srinivas R. Sadda,et al.  Electrical stimulation in normal and retinal degeneration (rd1) isolated mouse retina , 2006, Vision Research.

[33]  F. Müller,et al.  Pharmacological Analysis of Intrinsic Neuronal Oscillations in rd10 Retina , 2014, PloS one.

[34]  Charles P. Ratliff,et al.  Changes in ganglion cell physiology during retinal degeneration influence excitability by prosthetic electrodes , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[35]  Yoonkey Nam,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell responses to voltage and current stimulation in wild-type and rd1 mouse retinas , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[36]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  D. Pascolini,et al.  Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010 , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[38]  Shelley I. Fried,et al.  Spatial properties of network-mediated response of retinal ganglion cells to electric stimulation , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[39]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Subretinal Visual Implant Alpha IMS – Clinical trial interim report , 2015, Vision Research.

[40]  Markus Meister,et al.  Multi-neuronal signals from the retina: acquisition and analysis , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[41]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina with acutely implanted electrode arrays , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[42]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Comparison of Electrical Stimulation Thresholds in Normal and Retinal Degenerated Mouse Retina , 2004, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[43]  Enrica Strettoi,et al.  Retinal organization in the retinal degeneration 10 (rd10) mutant mouse: A morphological and ERG study , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[44]  P. Gruss,et al.  Generating neuronal diversity in the retina: one for nearly all , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Can subretinal microphotodiodes successfully replace degenerated photoreceptors? , 1999, Vision Research.

[46]  Sen Song,et al.  A genetic and computational approach to structurally classify neuronal types , 2014, Nature Communications.

[47]  A. Stett,et al.  Retinal charge sensitivity and spatial discrimination obtainable by subretinal implants: key lessons learned from isolated chicken retina , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[48]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[49]  E. Margalit,et al.  Inner and outer retinal mechanisms engaged by epiretinal stimulation in normal and rd mice , 2011, Visual Neuroscience.

[50]  J. Menzler,et al.  Rhythmic Ganglion Cell Activity in Bleached and Blind Adult Mouse Retinas , 2014, PloS one.

[51]  Volker Busskamp,et al.  Optogenetic approaches to restoring visual function in retinitis pigmentosa , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[52]  Jean Bennett,et al.  Safety and durability of effect of contralateral-eye administration of AAV2 gene therapy in patients with childhood-onset blindness caused by RPE65 mutations: a follow-on phase 1 trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[53]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  Chung-Yu Wu,et al.  Responses of rabbit retinal ganglion cells to subretinal electrical stimulation using a silicon-based microphotodiode array. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[55]  S. Fried,et al.  Response variability to high rates of electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  E. Margalit,et al.  Simultaneous recording of mouse retinal ganglion cells during epiretinal or subretinal stimulation , 2014, Vision Research.

[57]  D. Otteson,et al.  Progression of neuronal and synaptic remodeling in the rd10 mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa , 2010, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[58]  D. Palanker,et al.  Selectivity of direct and network-mediated stimulation of the retinal ganglion cells with epi-, sub- and intraretinal electrodes , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[59]  Eberhart Zrenner,et al.  Studies on the feasibility of a subretinal visual prosthesis: data from Yucatan micropig and rabbit , 2001, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[60]  Daniel K Freeman,et al.  Multiple components of ganglion cell desensitization in response to prosthetic stimulation , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[61]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Responses of rabbit retinal ganglion cells to electrical stimulation with an epiretinal electrode , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[62]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with a subretinal electrode. , 2006, Experimental eye research.

[63]  W. Taylor,et al.  Differential loss and preservation of glutamate receptor function in bipolar cells in the rd10 mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[64]  N. K. Dhingra,et al.  Retinal Remodeling: Concerns, Emerging Remedies and Future Prospects , 2016, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[65]  Donald K Eddington,et al.  Responses to pulsatile subretinal electric stimulation: effects of amplitude and duration. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  Sheila Nirenberg,et al.  Classification of retinal ganglion cells: a statistical approach. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  Alex E. Hadjinicolaou,et al.  Optimizing the Electrical Stimulation of Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[68]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Embryonic stem cell trials for macular degeneration: a preliminary report , 2012, The Lancet.

[69]  B. Jones,et al.  Retinal remodeling in human retinitis pigmentosa. , 2016, Experimental eye research.

[70]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Upper threshold of extracellular neural stimulation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[71]  Y. Goo,et al.  Spontaneous Oscillatory Rhythms in the Degenerating Mouse Retina Modulate Retinal Ganglion Cell Responses to Electrical Stimulation , 2016, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[72]  M. Dorman,et al.  A Sensitive Period for the Development of the Central Auditory System in Children with Cochlear Implants: Implications for Age of Implantation , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[73]  S. Resnikoff,et al.  Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. , 2004, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[74]  Mark E Pennesi,et al.  Long-term characterization of retinal degeneration in rd1 and rd10 mice using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[75]  Roland Thewes,et al.  Electrical stimulation of retinal neurons in epiretinal and subretinal configuration using a multicapacitor array. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[76]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina , 2000, Vision Research.

[77]  N. Cuenca,et al.  Functional and structural modifications during retinal degeneration in the rd10 mouse , 2008, Neuroscience.

[78]  David B. Grayden,et al.  The effect of morphology upon electrophysiological responses of retinal ganglion cells: simulation results , 2013, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[79]  S. Ryu,et al.  Characterization of retinal ganglion cell activities evoked by temporally patterned electrical stimulation for the development of stimulus encoding strategies for retinal implants , 2009, Brain Research.

[80]  R. Liebelt,et al.  The postnatal development of the retina in the normal and rodless CBA mouse: a light and electron microscopic study. , 1972, The American journal of anatomy.

[81]  Michael P. Andrews,et al.  Developmental time course distinguishes changes in spontaneous and light-evoked retinal ganglion cell activity in rd1 and rd10 mice. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[82]  J. Ye,et al.  Comparison of Voltage Parameters for the Stimulation of Normal and Degenerate Retina , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[83]  R Samba,et al.  PEDOT–CNT coated electrodes stimulate retinal neurons at low voltage amplitudes and low charge densities , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[84]  E J Chichilnisky,et al.  Focal Electrical Stimulation of Major Ganglion Cell Types in the Primate Retina for the Design of Visual Prostheses , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[85]  S Sekhar,et al.  Tickling the retina: integration of subthreshold electrical pulses can activate retinal neurons , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.