An evaluation of quality of service for H.264 over 802.11e WLANs

802.11 wireless local area networks are now a common feature in the home. In order to meet the quality of service (QoS) demands for the increasing number of multimedia applications on these home networks the 802.11e amendment was developed. A suitable video coding standard for these multimedia applications is H.264 due to its high compression and error resilience. In this paper we investigate how the quality of H.264 video is affected as the number of concurrent video streams sent over a multi-rate 802.11e network is increased. Several packet mapping schemes are compared. We show that the mapping schemes which differentiate video packets based on their frame type are more successful at maintaining acceptable video quality when congestion occurs, providing a more gradual quality degradation as congestion increases rather than the cliff-edge quality drop that tends to occur with the other mapping schemes. These differentiated schemes are more successful for videos that do not have a high amount of temporal activity. We also identify that impairments caused by congestion tend to occur towards the bottom of each frame when the flexible macroblock ordering (FMO) feature of H.264 is not used but the use of FMO can reduce this effect.

[1]  Itu-T and Iso Iec Jtc Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services , 2010 .

[2]  Timothy O'Farrell,et al.  Effectiveness of H.264 Error Resilience Techniques in 802.11e WLANs , 2009, 2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[3]  John G. Beerends,et al.  The Influence of Video Quality on Perceived Audio Quality and Vice Versa , 1999 .

[4]  T. Aaron Gulliver,et al.  Wireless Mesh Networks for In-Home IPTV Distribution , 2008, IEEE Network.

[5]  Young-Tak Kim,et al.  QoS-Guaranteed IPTV Service Provisioning in Home Network with IEEE 802.11e Wireless LAN , 2008, NOMS Workshops 2008 - IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium Workshops.

[6]  Mohamed Naimi,et al.  Improving H.264 video transmission in 802.11e EDCA , 2005, Proceedings. 14th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, 2005. ICCCN 2005..

[7]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Rate-constrained coder control and comparison of video coding standards , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[8]  Miska M. Hannuksela,et al.  RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video , 2005, RFC.

[9]  JongWon Kim,et al.  Performance Evaluation of H.264 Mapping Strategies over IEEE 802.11e WLAN for Robust Video Streaming , 2005, PCM.

[10]  Ajay Luthra,et al.  Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[11]  Stephan Wenger,et al.  H.264/AVC over IP , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[12]  Timothy O'Farrell,et al.  QoS of Video Delivered over 802.11e WLANs , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[13]  Chih-Heng Ke,et al.  An Evaluation Framework for More Realistic Simulations of MPEG Video Transmission , 2008, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[14]  A. M. Abdullah,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1997 .

[15]  Mark Davis,et al.  Video Frame Differentiation for Streamed Multimedia over Heavily Loaded IEEE 802.11e WLAN using TXOP , 2007, 2007 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[16]  Ajay Luthra,et al.  Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[17]  M. Mattavelli,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on multimedia implementation », IEEE Trans. On Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 2004 .