A Concept for Support of Firefighter Frontline Communication

In an indoor firefighter mission, coordination and communication support are of the utmost importance. We present our experience from over five years of research with current firefighter support technology. In contrast to some large scale emergency response research, our work is focused on the frontline interaction between teams of firefighters and the incident commander on a single site. In this paper we investigate the flaws in firefighter communication systems. Frequent technical failures and the high cognitive costs incurred by communicating impede coordination. We then extract a list of requirements for an assistant emergency management technology from expert interviews. Thirdly, we provide a system concept and explore challenges for building a novel firefighter support system based on our previous work. The system has three key features: robust ad-hoc network, telemetry and text messaging, as well as implicit interaction. The result would provide a complementary mode of communication in addition to the current trunked radio.

[1]  William D. Davis,et al.  Thermal Environment for Electronic Equipment Used by First Responders. | NIST , 2006 .

[2]  Leonardo Ramirez,et al.  Designing for FirefightersBuilding Empathy through Live Action Role-Playing , 2009 .

[3]  Jingyuan Li,et al.  Automatic and robust breadcrumb system deployment for indoor firefighter applications , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[4]  David V. Keyson,et al.  Rigid structures, independent units, monitoring: organizing patterns in frontline firefighting , 2011, CHI.

[5]  Gunnar Stevens,et al.  Handy navigation in ever-changing spaces: an ethnographic study of firefighting practices , 2008, DIS '08.

[6]  Lili Yang,et al.  Evaluation of a software prototype for supporting fire emergency response , 2011, ISCRAM.

[7]  Ian Alexander.  Designing Collaborative Systems. A Practical Guide to Ethnography , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  James A. Landay,et al.  Siren: Context-aware Computing for Firefighting , 2004, Pervasive.

[9]  Erol Gelenbe,et al.  Opportunistic Communications for Emergency Support Systems , 2011, ANT/MobiWIS.

[10]  Paul K. Wright,et al.  A Wireless Sensor Network and Incident Command Interface for Urban Firefighting , 2007, 2007 Fourth Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services (MobiQuitous).

[11]  Kavitha Muthukrishnan,et al.  SLAM for Pedestrians and Ultrasonic Landmarks in Emergency Response Scenarios , 2011, Adv. Comput..

[12]  Leonardo Ramirez,et al.  Designing for high expectations: balancing ambiguity and thorough specification in the design of a wayfinding tool for firefighters , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[13]  Yanning Yang,et al.  Wireless Sensor Data Processing for On-Site Emergency Response , 2011 .

[14]  Matthias Budde,et al.  ActiServ: Activity Recognition Service for mobile phones , 2010, International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) 2010.

[15]  James Brusey,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for activity monitoring in safety critical applications , 2009 .

[16]  Markus Scholz,et al.  Evaluation of wireless sensor technologies in a firefighting environment , 2010, 2010 Seventh International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS).

[17]  Erol Gelenbe,et al.  Distributed Building Evacuation Simulator for Smart Emergency Management , 2010, Comput. J..

[18]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Landmarke: an ad hoc deployable ubicomp infrastructure to support indoor navigation of firefighters , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[19]  Sebastian Denef,et al.  Towards human-centered support for indoor navigation , 2009, CHI.

[20]  Erol Gelenbe,et al.  Large scale simulation for human evacuation and rescue , 2012, Comput. Math. Appl..

[21]  Francois Capman,et al.  Are IEEE 802 Wireless Technologies Suited for Fire Fighters , 2006 .

[22]  Ramona Rednic,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for activity monitoring in safety c ritical applications , 2009 .