Listening to Indigenous Voices, Interests, and Priorities That Would Inform Tribal Co-Management of Natural Resources on a California State University Forest

Indigenous communities have experienced a loss of access and ability to contribute to the management of natural resources due to removal from lands, marginalization, and conflicting knowledge systems. Currently, there is increasing momentum toward re-engaging tribes as stewards of their ancestral lands. This article outlines tribal views on co-management and identifies the forest management objectives of a tribal partner to help better inform a forest co-management partnership between a Native American Tribe (Wiyot Tribe) and a California Polytechnic State University (Humboldt). Qualitative research methods were used to analyze 13 semi-structured interviews utilizing an adaptive co-management framework with enrolled tribal members and representatives to understand the expectations and perceived barriers to a successful co-management relationship. Interviewees repeatedly mentioned interest in the management of wildlife, forest health and resilience, and fuels reduction. Participants also expressed interest in incorporating education and training of tribal youth in the management of forest resources and traditional ecological knowledge. The semi-structured interviews provided participants a platform to share their thoughts and express their feelings regarding the future stewardship of ancestral forest lands.

[1]  Lara A. Jacobs,et al.  Reimagining U.S. Federal Land Management through Decolonization and Indigenous Value Systems , 2022, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration.

[2]  K. Norgaard,et al.  The Politics of Fire and the Social Impacts of Fire Exclusion on the Klamath1 , 2022, Humboldt Journal of Social Relations.

[3]  R. Hajjar,et al.  Learning from Tribal Leadership and the Anchor Forest Concept for Implementing Cross-Boundary Forest Management , 2021 .

[4]  N. Schuldt,et al.  Transforming research and relationships through collaborative tribal-university partnerships on Manoomin (wild rice) , 2021 .

[5]  Frank K. Lake,et al.  Recentering ecological restoration with tribal perspectives , 2020 .

[6]  Frank K. Lake,et al.  Enhancing Food Sovereignty: A Five-year Collaborative Tribal-University Research and Extension Project in California and Oregon , 2019, Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development.

[7]  C. Lee,et al.  An interview project with native American people: a community-based study to identify actionable steps to reduce health disparities. , 2019, Public health.

[8]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[9]  L. Sponsel.  Sacred Ecology , 2018, The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology.

[10]  Frank K. Lake,et al.  Returning fire to the land: celebrating traditional knowledge and fire , 2017 .

[11]  J. Franklin,et al.  Klamath Tribes: Managing Their Homeland Forests in Partnership with the USDA Forest Service , 2017 .

[12]  R. Coleman,et al.  Lessons from a Programmatic Agreement and Heritage-Based Consultations between Tribes and the National Forests of Arkansas and Oklahoma , 2017 .

[13]  M. Davenport,et al.  Building bridges: Perspectives on partnership and collaboration from the US forest service tribal relations program , 2017 .

[14]  S. Diver.  Co-management as a Catalyst: Pathways to Post-colonial Forestry in the Klamath Basin, California , 2016, Human ecology: an interdisciplinary journal.

[15]  G. Cundill,et al.  Co-Management, Land Rights, and Conflicts Around South Africa’s Silaka Nature Reserve , 2016 .

[16]  M. Davenport,et al.  "A lot of it comes from the heart": The nature and integration of ecological knowledge in tribal and nontribal forest management , 2016 .

[17]  J. Coutts,et al.  Evaluation of social and ecological outcomes of fisheries co-management in Tam Giang Lagoon, Vietnam , 2016 .

[18]  C. Allen,et al.  Adaptive Management of Social-Ecological Systems , 2015 .

[19]  Don L. Hankins,et al.  The Retention, Revival, and Subjugation of Indigenous Fire Knowledge through Agency Fire Fighting in Eastern Australia and California , 2014 .

[20]  Ron W. Goode,et al.  The stories hold water: Learning and burning in North Fork Mono homelands , 2014 .

[21]  Michelle C. Moorman,et al.  Stakeholder Perspectives on Prospects for Co-Management of an Old-Growth Forest Watershed Near Valdivia, Chile , 2013 .

[22]  Frank K. Lake,et al.  Cultural impacts to tribes from climate change influences on forests , 2013, Climatic Change.

[23]  Frank K. Lake,et al.  The impacts of climate change on tribal traditional foods , 2013, Climatic Change.

[24]  R. Ison,et al.  Identifying the conditions for social learning in water governance in regional Australia , 2013 .

[25]  M. Hamann,et al.  Bridging Knowledges: Understanding and Applying Indigenous and Western Scientific Knowledge for Marine Wildlife Management , 2013 .

[26]  R. Plummer,et al.  Adaptive Co-Management for Climate Change Adaptation: Considerations for the Barents Region , 2013 .

[27]  S. Pinel,et al.  Generating Co-Management at Kasha Katuwe Tent Rocks National Monument, New Mexico , 2012, Environmental Management.

[28]  G. White.  Cultures in Collision: Traditional Knowledge and Euro-Canadian Governance Processes in Northern Land-Claim Boards , 2009 .

[29]  R. Plummer.  The Adaptive Co-Management Process: an Initial Synthesis of Representative Models and Influential Variables , 2009 .

[30]  Anna Zachrisson.  Deliberative democracy and co-management of natural resources: The case of Funäsdalen snowmobile regulation area , 2009 .

[31]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[32]  F. Berkes,et al.  Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity , 2009 .

[33]  M. Leach.  Pathways to Sustainability in the Forest? Misunderstood Dynamics and the Negotiation of Knowledge, Power, and Policy , 2008 .

[34]  Birgitte Ulvevadet.  Management of reindeer husbandry in Norway - power-sharing and participation , 2008 .

[35]  Derek R. Armitage,et al.  Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning , 2008 .

[36]  D. Ostergren,et al.  Democracy, Participation, and Native American Tribes in Collaborative Watershed Management , 2007 .

[37]  Knut H. Mikalsen,et al.  Leaning on user-groups: The role of civil society in fisheries governance , 2007 .

[38]  Jessica E. Leahy,et al.  Building Trust in Natural Resource Management Within Local Communities: A Case Study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie , 2007, Environmental management.

[39]  M. Fernández-Giménez,et al.  Integration or co-optation? Traditional knowledge and science in the Alaska Beluga Whale Committee , 2006, Environmental Conservation.

[40]  R. Welch,et al.  Comanagement of Natural Resources , 2006 .

[41]  F. Berkes,et al.  Knowledge, Learning and the Evolution of Conservation Practice for Social-Ecological System Resilience , 2006 .

[42]  David C. Natcher,et al.  Co-management : Managing relationships, not resources , 2005 .

[43]  F. Berkes,et al.  Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  Beverly J. Klug.  Widening the Circle , 2002, Building Resilience in Children and Teens.

[45]  Christophe Béné,et al.  Empowerment reform, yes ... but empowerment of whom? Fisheries decentralization reforms in developing countries: a critical assessment with specific reference to poverty reduction , 2004 .

[46]  John Fitzgibbon,et al.  Co-management of Natural Resources: A Proposed Framework , 2004, Environmental management.

[47]  C. Folke,et al.  Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems , 2004, Environmental management.

[48]  Alexander Conley,et al.  Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement , 2003 .

[49]  E. Peters.  Views of traditional ecological knowledge in co-management bodies in Nunavik, Quebec , 2003, Polar Record.

[50]  Paul Nadasdy,et al.  Reevaluating the Co-management Success Story , 2003 .

[51]  Jesper Raakjær,et al.  The Fisheries Co-management Experience , 2003, Fish and Fisheries Series.

[52]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations , 2002, Ambio.

[53]  C. Folke,et al.  Local Ecological Knowledge and Institutional Dynamics for Ecosystem Management: A Study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden , 2001, Ecosystems.

[54]  Hugh Ward,et al.  Social Capital and the Environment , 2001 .

[55]  S. Singleton.  Co‐operation or capture? The paradox of co‐management and community participation in natural resource management and environmental policy‐making , 2000 .

[56]  S. Jentoft.  Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management , 2000 .

[57]  C. Pomeroy,et al.  An Experiment in Fishery Co-management: Evidence From Big Creek , 1999 .

[58]  Evelyn Pinkerton,et al.  Factors in Overcoming Barriers to Implementing Co-management in British Columbia Salmon Fisheries , 1999 .

[59]  Paul Nadasdy,et al.  THE POLITICS OF TEK: POWER AND THE "INTEGRATION" OF KNOWLEDGE , 1999 .

[60]  J. R. Nielsen,et al.  Fisheries co-management: a comparative analysis☆ , 1996 .

[61]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  A Forest for the Trees: Forest Management and the Yurok Environment, , 2007 .

[62]  R. Pomeroy.  Community-based and co-management institutions for sustainable coastal fisheries management in Southeast Asia , 1995 .