Loss of Function but No Gain of Function Caused by Amino Acid Substitutions in the Hexapeptide of Hoxa1 In Vivo

ABSTRACT Homeodomain containing transcription factors of the Hox family play critical roles in patterning the anteroposterior embryonic body axis, as well as in controlling several steps of organogenesis. Several Hox proteins have been shown to cooperate with members of the Pbx family for the recognition and activation of identified target enhancers. Hox proteins contact Pbx via a conserved hexapeptide motif. Previous biochemical studies provided evidence that critical amino acid substitutions in the hexapeptide sequence of Hoxa1 abolish its interaction with Pbx. As a result, these substitutions also abolish Hoxa1 activity on known target enhancers in cellular models, suggesting that Hoxa1 activity relies on its capacity to interact with Pbx. Here, we show that mice with mutations in the Hoxa1 hexapeptide display hindbrain, cranial nerve, and skeletal defects highly reminiscent of those reported for the Hoxa1 loss of function. Since similar hexapeptide mutations in the mouse Hoxb8 and the Drosophila AbdA proteins result in activity modulation and gain of function, our data demonstrate that the functional importance of the hexapeptide in vivo differs according to the Hox proteins.

[1]  Y. Graba,et al.  The hexapeptide and linker regions of the AbdA Hox protein regulate its activating and repressive functions. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[2]  S. Chanda,et al.  Requirement for Pbx1 in skeletal patterning and programming chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. , 2001, Development.

[3]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S4 Tables S1 and S2 References and Notes Hox10 and Hox11 Genes Are Required to Globally Pattern the Mammalian Skeleton , 2022 .

[4]  M. Wegner,et al.  Sox10, a Novel Transcriptional Modulator in Glial Cells , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  P. Dollé,et al.  Developmental functions of mammalian Hox genes. , 1997, Molecular human reproduction.

[6]  Cynthia Wolberger,et al.  Structure of HoxA9 and Pbx1 bound to DNA: Hox hexapeptide and DNA recognition anterior to posterior. , 2003, Genes & development.

[7]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Segmental expression of Hox-2 homoeobox-containing genes in the developing mouse hindbrain , 1989, Nature.

[8]  P. Chambon,et al.  Insertion of a targeting construct in a Hoxd‐10 allele can influence the control of Hoxd‐9 expression , 1994, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[9]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Compensatory defects associated with mutations in Hoxa1 restore normal palatogenesis to Hoxa2 mutants. , 1999, Development.

[10]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Hoxc13 mutant mice lack external hair. , 1998, Genes & development.

[11]  M. Capecchi.  Hox genes and mammalian development. , 1997, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[12]  D. Duboule,et al.  Organizing Axes in Time and Space; 25 Years of Colinear Tinkering , 2003, Science.

[13]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch. , 1998, Development.

[14]  J C Olivo,et al.  Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice. , 1993, Development.

[15]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Cross-regulatory interactions between Hox genes and the control of segmental expression in the vertebrate central nervous system. , 1997, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[16]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Paralogous mouse Hox genes, Hoxa9, Hoxb9, and Hoxd9, function together to control development of the mammary gland in response to pregnancy. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  P. Angrand,et al.  Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by the synthetic steroid RU 486. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  A. Graham,et al.  Domains of cellular retinoic acid-binding protein I (CRABP I) expression in the hindbrain and neural crest of the mouse embryo , 1992, Mechanisms of Development.

[19]  M. Cleary,et al.  Pbx proteins display hexapeptide-dependent cooperative DNA binding with a subset of Hox proteins. , 1995, Genes & development.

[20]  G. Morriss-Kay,et al.  Genetic patterning of the posterior neuropore region of curly tail mouse embryos: deficiency of Wnt5a expression. , 1998, The International journal of developmental biology.

[21]  P. Knoepfler,et al.  The pentapeptide motif of Hox proteins is required for cooperative DNA binding with Pbx1, physically contacts Pbx1, and enhances DNA binding by Pbx1 , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[22]  L. Gudas,et al.  Early retinoic acid-induced F9 teratocarcinoma stem cell gene ERA-1: alternate splicing creates transcripts for a homeobox-containing protein and one lacking the homeobox , 1988, Molecular and cellular biology.

[23]  C. Shaw-Jackson,et al.  Changing homeodomain residues 2 and 3 of Hoxa1 alters its activity in a cell-type and enhancer dependent manner. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox geneHox-#150;1.6 , 1992, Nature.

[25]  R. Ramirez-Solis,et al.  In vivo mutagenesis of the Hoxb8 hexapeptide domain leads to dominant homeotic transformations that mimic the loss-of-function mutations in genes of the Hoxb cluster. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[26]  P. Murphy,et al.  Expression of the mouse labial-like homeobox-containing genes, Hox 2.9 and Hox 1.6, during segmentation of the hindbrain. , 1991, Development.

[27]  P Chambon,et al.  Segmentation and specification in the branchial region of the head: the role of the Hox selector genes. , 1998, The International journal of developmental biology.

[28]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Loss of Hox-A1 (Hox-1.6) function results in the reorganization of the murine hindbrain. , 1993, Development.

[29]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  An extradenticle‐induced conformational change in a HOX protein overcomes an inhibitory function of the conserved hexapeptide motif. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[30]  I. Rambaldi,et al.  Cooperative interactions between HOX and PBX proteins mediated by a conserved peptide motif , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[31]  G. Barsh,et al.  The mouse segmentation gene kr encodes a novel basic domain-leucine zipper transcription factor , 1994, Cell.

[32]  P. Chambon,et al.  Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression , 1991, Cell.

[33]  A. McMahon,et al.  Cholesterol Modification of Sonic Hedgehog Is Required for Long-Range Signaling Activity and Effective Modulation of Signaling by Ptc1 , 2001, Cell.

[34]  A. Laughon,et al.  DNA binding specificity of homeodomains. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[35]  C. Murre,et al.  Pbx raises the DNA binding specificity but not the selectivity of antennapedia Hox proteins , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[36]  Juan Botas,et al.  The DNA binding specificity of ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein , 1994, Cell.

[37]  A. Waskiewicz,et al.  Eliminating zebrafish pbx proteins reveals a hindbrain ground state. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[38]  V. Luria,et al.  Maternally expressed PGK-Cre transgene as a tool for early and uniform activation of the Cre site-specific recombinase , 1998, Transgenic Research.

[39]  C. Meijer,et al.  The role of Homeobox genes in normal hematopoiesis and hematological malignancies , 1999, Leukemia.

[40]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Synergy between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1: the relationship between arch patterning and the generation of cranial neural crest. , 2001, Development.

[41]  P. Angrand,et al.  Targeted insertion results in a Rhombomere 2‐specific Hoxa2 knockdown and ectopic activation of Hoxa1 expression , 2002, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[42]  C. Murre,et al.  extradenticle Raises the DNA binding specificity of homeotic selector gene products , 1994, Cell.

[43]  M. Featherstone,et al.  Distinct HOX N-terminal Arm Residues Are Responsible for Specificity of DNA Recognition by HOX Monomers and HOX·PBX Heterodimers* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.