Wind tunnel performance of four energy efficient propellers designed for Mach 0.8 cruise. [Lewis 8x6 foot wind tunnel studies for noise reduction in high speed turboprop aircraft]

Several advanced aerodynamic and acoustic concepts were investigated in recent wind tunnel tests performed in the NASA-Lewis Research Center 8x6 foot wind tunnel. These concepts included aerodynamically integrated propeller/nacelles, area-ruling, blade sweep, reduced blade thickness, and power (disk) loadings several times higher than conventional designs. Four eight-bladed propeller models were tested to determine aerodynamic performance. Relative noise measurements were made on three of the models at cruise conditions. Three of the models were designed with swept blades and one with straight blades. At the design Mach number of 0.8, power coefficient of 1.7, and advance ratio of 3.06, the straight bladed model had the lowest net efficiency of 75.8 percent. Increasing the sweep to 30 deg improved the performance to near 77 percent. Installation of an area-ruled spinner on a 30 deg sweep model further improved the efficiency to about 78 percent. The model with the highest blade sweep (45 deg) and an area-ruled spinner had the highest net efficiency of 78.7 percent, and at lower power loadings the efficiency exceeded 80 percent. At lower Mach numbers the 30 deg swept model had the highest efficiency. Values near 81 percent were obtained for the design loading at speeds to Mach 0.7. Relative noise measurements indicated that the acoustically designed 45 deg sweep model reduced the near field cruise noise by between 5 and 6 dB.

[1]  J. P. Hopkins,et al.  Study of the cost/benefit tradeoffs for reducing the energy consumption of the commercial air transportation system. Summary report, Nov. 1974 - Mar. 1976 , 1976 .

[2]  D. E. Gray,et al.  Fuel Conservative Propulsion Concepts for Future Air Transports , 1976 .

[3]  W. C. Strack,et al.  Preliminary Study of Advanced Turboprops for Low Energy Consumption , 1975 .

[4]  James F. Dugan,et al.  Prop-fan propulsion - Its status and potential , 1978 .

[5]  John A. Stern,et al.  Aircraft Propulsion A Key to Fuel Conservation An Aircraft Manufacturer's View , 1976 .

[6]  Gray.  Study of turbofan engines designed for low energy consumption. Final report , 1976 .

[7]  R. E. Coykendall,et al.  Study of cost/benefit tradeoffs for reducing the energy consumption of the commercial air transportation system. [Advanced turboprop introduction] , 1976 .

[8]  R. A. Aiello,et al.  NASA Lewis 8 by 6 foot supersonic wind tunnel. [facility description with performance data , 1974 .

[9]  Richard L. Foss,et al.  Fuel Conservative Potential for the Use of Turboprop Powerplants , 1976 .

[10]  Robert M Reynolds,et al.  An Investigation of a Four-blade Single-rotation Propeller in Combination with an NACA 1-series D-type Cowling at Mach Numbers up to 0.83 , 1953 .

[11]  D. M. Black,et al.  Aerodynamic design and performance testing of an advanced 30 deg swept, eight bladed propeller at Mach numbers from 0.2 to 0.85 , 1978 .

[12]  C. Rohrbach,et al.  The Prop-Fan - A new look in propulsors , 1975 .

[13]  R. E. Neitzel,et al.  Alternative Concepts for Advanced Energy Conservative Transport Engines , 1976 .

[14]  R. P. Johnston,et al.  Study of unconventional aircraft engines designed for low energy consumption , 1976 .

[15]  J. H. Dittmar,et al.  Tone noise of three supersonic helical tip speed propellers in a wind tunnel at 0.8 Mach number , 1978 .

[16]  D. B. Hanson,et al.  Near field noise of high tip speed propellers in forward flight , 1976 .

[17]  C. Rohrbach,et al.  A report on the aerodynamic design and wind tunnel test of a Prop-Fan model , 1976 .