Channelized hotelling observers for the detection of 2D signals in 3D simulated images

Current clinical practice is increasingly moving in the direction of volumetric imaging. However, model observers for 3D images have been little explored so far. This study is investigating the task of detecting 2D signals in multi-slice simulated image data. We propose a novel design of a multi-slice model observer. To evaluate it, we compare three different model designs of the channelized Hotelling observer (CHO), two multi-slice and one single-slice model. The multi-slice models are built as a sequence of a 2D CHO and 1D HO, where the CHO is used to calculate a vector of metrics for each slice in the planar view and the HO is used to calculate the final scalar statistic of the model. The single-slice model is a 2D CHO applied on the location of the lesion. Our results show that the multi-slice models outperform the single-slice one, and here the new model surpasses the existing one.

[1]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  H. Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[5]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Using the Hotelling observer on multi-slice and multi-view simulated SPECT myocardial images , 2001 .

[6]  R. G. Wells,et al.  A comparison of human and model observers in multislice LROC studies , 2005, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[7]  Harrison H Barrett,et al.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  C. Comtat,et al.  A comparison of planar versus volumetric numerical observers for detection task performance in whole-body PET imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[9]  Brandon D Gallas,et al.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[10]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Image browsing in slow medical liquid crystal displays. , 2008, Academic radiology.