Social Learning Strategies in Networked Groups

When making decisions, humans can observe many kinds of information about others' activities, but their effects on performance are not well understood. We investigated social learning strategies using a simple problem-solving task in which participants search a complex space, and each can view and imitate others' solutions. Results showed that participants combined multiple sources of information to guide learning, including payoffs of peers' solutions, popularity of solution elements among peers, similarity of peers' solutions to their own, and relative payoffs from individual exploration. Furthermore, performance was positively associated with imitation rates at both the individual and group levels. When peers' payoffs were hidden, popularity and similarity biases reversed, participants searched more broadly and randomly, and both quality and equity of exploration suffered. We conclude that when peers' solutions can be effectively compared, imitation does not simply permit scrounging, but it can also facilitate propagation of good solutions for further cumulative exploration.

[1]  C. Lumsden.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London (1985), viii, +301. Price $29.95 , 1986 .

[2]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[3]  Daisuke Nakanishi,et al.  Cost–benefit analysis of social/cultural learning in a nonstationary uncertain environment: An evolutionary simulation and an experiment with human subjects , 2002 .

[4]  Luc-Alain Giraldeau,et al.  Vicarious sampling: the use of personal and public information by starlings foraging in a simple patchy environment , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[6]  A. Rubinstein.  International Economic Review " Economics and Psychology " ? the Case of Hyperbolic Discounting * , 2003 .

[7]  A. Bandura.  Vicarious Processes: A Case of No-Trial Learning1 , 1965 .

[8]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[9]  Ichiro Umata,et al.  Graphical Language Games: Interactional Constraints on Representational Form , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Deborah E. Gibbons,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE AND INNOVATION AMBIGUITY EFFECTS ON DIFFUSION IN DYNAMIC ORGANIZATIONAL FIELDS , 2004 .

[11]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[12]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  How You Named Your Child: Understanding the Relationship Between Individual Decision Making and Collective Outcomes , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Information Cascades in the Laboratory , 1998 .

[14]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[15]  P. Richerson,et al.  Cultural evolution in laboratory microsocieties including traditions of rule giving and rule following , 2004 .

[16]  Adrian Kuhn.  Collective Behavior , 2007 .

[17]  I. Giardina.  Collective Animal Behavior David J.T. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  A. Mesoudi.  An experimental simulation of the “copy-successful-individuals” cultural learning strategy: adaptive landscapes, producer–scrounger dynamics, and informational access costs , 2008 .

[19]  K. Laland,et al.  Social Learning in Animals: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Models , 2005 .

[20]  J. Simpson,et al.  Groups as Adaptive Devices: Human Docility and Group Aggregation Mechanisms in Evolutionary Context , 2013 .

[21]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[22]  Winter A. Mason,et al.  Collaborative learning in networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Democracy Under Uncertainty: The ‘Wisdom of Crowds’ and the Free-Rider Problem in Group Decision Making , 2010, Psychological review.

[24]  H. Roche,et al.  Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010 .

[25]  Thomas R. Zentall,et al.  Imitation by Animals , 2003 .

[26]  T. Zentall,et al.  Imitation in Japanese quail: The role of reinforcement of demonstrator responding , 1998 .

[27]  Craig W. Benkman,et al.  The use and misuse of public information by foraging red crossbills , 1999 .

[28]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[29]  K. Laland.  Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[30]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Beyond existence and aiming outside the laboratory: estimating frequency-dependent and pay-off-biased social learning strategies , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  S Hurley,et al.  Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science. Imitation, human development and culture. , 2005 .

[32]  Robert S. Baron,et al.  The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. , 1996 .

[33]  HighWire Press.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[34]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Conformists and mavericks: the empirics of frequency-dependent cultural transmission , 2008 .

[35]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  Experimental Semiotics: A New Approach for Studying Communication as a Form of Joint Action , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[36]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[37]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Recognizing group cognition Action editor : , 2010 .

[38]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Propagation of innovations in networked groups. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Innovation, imitation, and problem-solving in a networked group. , 2011, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[40]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[41]  Douglas T. Kenrick,et al.  Evolution and social psychology. , 2006 .

[42]  Alan R. Rogers,et al.  Does Biology Constrain Culture , 1988 .

[43]  S. Ohlsson,et al.  Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving , 1999 .

[44]  V. Eguíluz,et al.  Transmission of information and herd Behavior: an application to financial markets. , 1999, Physical review letters.

[45]  Daisuke Nakanishi,et al.  Does social/cultural learning increase human adaptability?: Rogers's question revisited , 2003 .

[46]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Knowledge of resources and competitors in human foraging , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Human foraging behavior in a virtual environment , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Computational models of collective behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[50]  Timothy M. Waring,et al.  Article in Press Evolution and Human Behavior Xxx (2005) Xxx – Xxx , 2022 .

[51]  Peter J. Richerson,et al.  Why does culture increase human adaptability , 1995 .

[52]  Rick Dale,et al.  Behavior Matching in Multimodal Communication Is Synchronized , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  G. Lupyan,et al.  Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure , 2010, PloS one.

[54]  T. Valone,et al.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[55]  P. Richerson,et al.  The Origin and Evolution of Cultures , 2005 .