Medical Preprints-A Debate Worth Having.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Following a similar movement in other academic fields, most notably the physical sciences and computing, biomedical researchers are increasingly exploring the use of preprint servers to rapidly disseminate their scholarly output.1-3 Preprint servers consist of online repositories that make scientific manuscripts available to view and cite, without prior external peer review. The largest and most popular site for preprints, arXiv.org, began accepting papers in 1991, and now contains more than 1.3 million articles from the physical sciences, with nearly 1 billion downloads as of August 2017.4 More recently, bioRxiv.org has begun to offer preprint services for the biological sciences and is growing rapidly, with nearly 17 000 preprints posted since its inception in 2013, most of them in the last year.5 While some preprints may be or will eventually be submitted to a journal and undergo peer review, others might not be destined to complete this process. These manuscripts may contain early-stage, unfiltered research findings, prompting significant debate in a number of scientific communities about their use. The possible arrival of MedArXiv,6 a recently
[1] E. Callaway. Preprints come to life , 2013, Nature.
[2] Martin Enserink,et al. Plan for new medical preprint server receives a mixed response , 2017 .
[3] Philip E. Bourne,et al. Preprints for the life sciences , 2016, Science.
[4] Philippe Desjardins-Proulx,et al. The Case for Open Preprints in Biology , 2013, PLoS biology.