The role of metacognition in recognition of the content of statistical learning

[1]  Noam Siegelman,et al.  Statistical learning abilities and their relation to language , 2020, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[2]  David Soto,et al.  Metacognitive processing in language learning tasks is affected by bilingualism. , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  David Soto,et al.  Neural bases of learning and recognition of statistical regularities , 2020, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Noam Siegelman,et al.  What exactly is learned in visual statistical learning? Insights from Bayesian modeling , 2019, Cognition.

[5]  Nicola Molinaro,et al.  Electrophysiology of statistical learning: Exploring the online learning process and offline learning product , 2019, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Attention reorganizes as structure is detected in dynamic action , 2018, Memory & Cognition.

[7]  Alan Langus,et al.  Transitional probabilities count more than frequency, but might not be used for memorization , 2017, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Towards a theory of individual differences in statistical learning , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Nathaniel D. Daw,et al.  Self-Evaluation of Decision-Making: A General Bayesian Framework for Metacognitive Computation , 2017, Psychological review.

[10]  Stephen M Fleming,et al.  HMeta-d: hierarchical Bayesian estimation of metacognitive efficiency from confidence ratings , 2016, bioRxiv.

[11]  A. Zénon,et al.  Statistical Regularities Attract Attention when Task-Relevant , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  David Soto,et al.  On the independence of visual awareness and metacognition: a signal detection theoretic analysis. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Blind Insight: Metacognitive Discrimination Despite Chance Task Performance , 2014, Psychological science.

[15]  H. Lau,et al.  How to measure metacognition , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Janne von Koss Torkildsen,et al.  Statistical learning under incidental versus intentional conditions , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[17]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Measures of metacognition on signal-detection theoretic models. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[18]  H. Lau,et al.  A detection theoretic explanation of blindsight suggests a link between conscious perception and metacognition , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  H. Lau,et al.  A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[20]  Matthew Davidson,et al.  Awareness-related activity in prefrontal and parietal cortices in blindsight reflects more than superior visual performance , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  The word segmentation process as revealed by click detection , 2011 .

[22]  Paulo Ventura,et al.  The impact of attention load on the use of statistical information and coarticulation as speech segmentation cues , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  The surprising power of statistical learning: When fragment knowledge leads to false memories of unheard words , 2009 .

[24]  Hatim A. Zariwala,et al.  Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence , 2008, Nature.

[25]  Arthur P. Shimamura,et al.  A Neurocognitive Approach to Metacognitive Monitoring and Control , 2008 .

[26]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  A. Cowey,et al.  Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Scott Sinnett,et al.  Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention , 2005, Cognition.

[29]  Susan J. Galvin,et al.  Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability: Discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Safa R. Zaki,et al.  Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  H. Pashler,et al.  Confidence and Accuracy of Near-Threshold Discrimination Responses , 2001, Consciousness and Cognition.

[32]  Jenny R Saffran,et al.  Words in a sea of sounds: the output of infant statistical learning , 2001, Cognition.

[33]  R. W. Kentridge,et al.  Metacognition and Awareness , 2000, Consciousness and Cognition.

[34]  Gregory Schraw.  Promoting general metacognitive awareness , 1998 .

[35]  T. O. Nelson.  Consciousness and metacognition. , 1996 .

[36]  Patrick Rabbitt,et al.  Processing a Display Even after you Make a Response to it. How Perceptual Errors can be Corrected , 1981, Cognitive Development and the Ageing Process.

[37]  Gary Cantor,et al.  On the Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Modes in the Learning of a Complex Rule Structure , 1980 .

[38]  Zellig S. Harris,et al.  From Phoneme to Morpheme , 1955 .

[39]  Elizabeth Haseltine,et al.  Metamemory , 2021, Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior.

[40]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[41]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[42]  J. Flavell.  Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .