Impact of national science policy on academic migration and research productivity in Russia

Abstract The impressive growth of research productivity of Russian organizations in the recent years is not accompanied by the corresponding increase in funding and occurred on the background of drop of number of R & D personnel according to state statistics. There is no definitive explanation of the nature of this phenomenon at the moment. This study is based on the detailed analysis of bibliometric data of Scopus database. Attribution of Russian authors’ affiliations to the main sectors of Russian science as well as to the economic regions of Russian Federation and fractional counting allowed us to track the trends in sectoral and territorial structure of Russian science. We revealed that the increase in the number of Russian publications is primarily caused by the outpacing increase in the number of authors. We suppose that this increase is related mainly to the high human resources capacity in the sector of higher education. Reforms of Russian science sector and changes in national science policy have drastically changed the shape and structure of Russian science that have been resulted in increased numbers of university faculty members involved in research and publishing activity. A more thorough study of the state of human resources and academic mobility is necessary for an enhanced understanding of nature of the processes and perspectives of Russian science development.

[1]  Mario Biagioli,et al.  Watch out for cheats in citation game , 2016, Nature.

[2]  Dmitriy G. Rodionov,et al.  Russian Universities: Towards Ambitious Goals , 2016 .

[3]  V. A. Markusova,et al.  Government investments and the publishing activity of higher educational institutions: Bibliometric analysis , 2016, Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Jan Schulz Using Monte Carlo simulations to assess the impact of author name disambiguation quality on different bibliometric analyses , 2016, Scientometrics.

[5]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[6]  Denis Kosyakov,et al.  Boosting research productivity in top Russian universities: the circumstances of breakthrough , 2018, Scientometrics.

[7]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies , 2004, Scientometrics.

[8]  Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent,et al.  A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[9]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science , 2018, Scientometrics.

[10]  V. Markusova,et al.  Publication activity and research cooperation between higher education institutions and the Russian Academy of Sciences , 2014, Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Tatiana Khvatova,et al.  University transformation: Explaining policy-making and trends in higher education in Russia , 2017 .

[13]  Denis Kosyakov,et al.  Стратегии повышения публикационной активности университетов - участников Проекта 5-100 , 2017 .

[14]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  A bibliometric approach to tracking international scientific migration , 2014, Scientometrics.