Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the era after commercialization: quo vadis in the real world?

Transcatheter, transarterial aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a revolutionary approach for the treatment of aortic valve stenosis, a lingering but malignant disease characterized by a long, symptom-free latency period but a high rate of death after the onset of symptoms.1,2 Introduced only recently in 2002,3 TAVI has entered the clinical arena in an unprecedented fashion. Offering for the first time a definite, catheter-based treatment option for nonsurgical and high-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, TAVI has been adopted rapidly in Europe despite the absence of data in larger patient populations and the lack of randomized studies. Initial first-in-humans feasibility and safety studies had been conducted by expert operators in highly specialized centers and selected patient groups in Europe and Canada that demonstrated a remarkable clinical success, but also unanticipated problems.4,–,7 However, the significant clinical benefit in the high-risk elderly patient population, for whom few options were available previously, led to a unique dissemination of TAVI, especially after Conformite Europeenne (CE) approval of the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences Inc, Irvine, CA) and the self-expandable Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) prosthesis in 2007. To date, more than 10 000 TAVI procedures have been performed worldwide with these devices, and the number of procedures is increasing continuously. Article see p 299 With this transfer into the real world, the value of TAVI in daily clinical practice now must be demonstrated. Randomized controlled clinical trials are the “gold standard” for evaluation of treatment effectiveness, providing the highest-quality data and evidence. The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial,8 conducted mainly at US centers, is the first prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial in the setting of TAVI to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transfemoral and transapical TAVI with the SAPIEN …

[1]  F. Maisano,et al.  Incidence and Predictors of Early and Late Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in 663 Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis , 2011, Circulation.

[2]  H. Eggebrecht,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. , 2011, European heart journal.

[3]  S. Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Thirty-Day Results of the SAPIEN Aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry: A European Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Edwards SAPIEN Valve , 2010, Circulation.

[5]  P. Wenaweser,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictors of procedural success--the Siegburg-Bern experience. , 2010, European heart journal.

[6]  H. Bueno,et al.  The role of cardiac registries in evidence-based medicine. , 2010, European heart journal.

[7]  T. Felderhoff,et al.  Progress and Current Status of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Three Device Generations of the CoreValve Revalving System , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) corevalve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval. , 2008, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  Lukas Altwegg,et al.  Percutaneous Transarterial Aortic Valve Replacement in Selected High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis , 2007, Circulation.

[10]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Thomas Felderhoff,et al.  Percutaneous Implantation of the CoreValve Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Valve Disease: The Siegburg First-in-Man Study , 2006, Circulation.

[12]  Christopher E. Buller,et al.  Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation Retrograde From the Femoral Artery , 2006, Circulation.

[13]  Assaf Bash,et al.  Percutaneous Transcatheter Implantation of an Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: First Human Case Description , 2002, Circulation.

[14]  B. Carabello,et al.  Aortic stenosis , 2018, Rapid Cardiac Care.