A method to improve the estimation of conduction velocity distributions over a short segment of nerve

Accurate, noninvasive determination of the distribution of conduction velocities (DCV) among fibers of a peripheral nerve has the potential to improve both clinical diagnoses of pathology and longitudinal studies of the progress of disease or the efficacy of treatments. Current techniques rely on long distances of propagation to increase the amount of temporal dispersion in the compound signals and reduce the relative effect of errors in the forward model. The method described in this paper attempts to reduce errors in DCV estimation through transfer function normalization and, thereby, eliminate the need for long segments of nerve. Compound action potential (CAP) signals are recorded from several, equally spaced electrodes in an array spanning only a 10-cm length of nerve. Relative nerve-to-electrode transfer functions (NETFs) between the nerve and each of the array electrodes are estimated by comparing discrete Fourier transforms of the array signals. NETFs are normalized along the array so that waveform differences can be attributed to the effects of temporal dispersion between recordings, and more accurate DCV estimates can be calculated from the short nerve segment. The method is tested using simulated and real CAP data. DCV estimates are improved for simulated signals. The normalization procedure results in DCVs that qualitatively match those from the literature when used on actual CAP recordings.

[1]  D.F. Stegeman,et al.  The inverse problem in electroneurography. II. Computational aspects and evaluation using simulated data , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  G Hirose,et al.  A new method for estimation of nerve conduction velocity distribution in the frequency domain. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  J Kimura,et al.  Principles and pitfalls of nerve conduction studies , 1984, Annals of neurology.

[4]  D. Perkel,et al.  Nerve fiber conduction-velocity distributions. II. Estimation based on two compound action potentials. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  D.F. Stegeman,et al.  The inverse problem in electroneurography. I. Conceptual basis and mathematical formulation , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Conduction velocity distributions compared to fiber size distributions in normal human sural nerve , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  B. Widrow,et al.  On the Nature and Elimination of Stimulus Artifact in Nerve Signals Evoked and Recorded Using Surface Electrodes , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  V. Hentz,et al.  Action potentials of curved nerves in finite limbs , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  J Kimura,et al.  Facts, fallacies, and fancies of nerve conduction studies: Twenty‐first annual Edward H. Lambert lecture , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[10]  Y. Tomita,et al.  A new method of estimating the distribution of muscle fiber conduction velocities. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  R.E. Gander,et al.  Determination of nerve conduction velocity distribution from sampled compound action potential signals , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Models and analysis of compound nerve action potentials. , 1991, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  L J Dorfman,et al.  Nerve fiber conduction-velocity distributions. I. Estimation based on the single-fiber and compound action potentials. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  L J Dorfman,et al.  Nerve fiber conduction velocity distributions: Studies of normal and diabetic human nerves , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[15]  S. Honda,et al.  Estimation of conduction velocity distribution by regularized-least-squares method , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  D. Sax,et al.  Clinical applications of the estimation of nerve conduction velocity distributions. , 1981, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[17]  L J Dorfman,et al.  The distribution of conduction velocities (DCV) in peripheral nerves: A review , 1984, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  Brian H. Brown,et al.  Determination of the Distribution of Conduction Velocities in Human Nerve Trunks , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.