Extension of embeddings in the computably enumerable degrees

Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem [Göd31] and his subsequent work on computable functions [Göd34] exhibited undecidability in the most familiar mathematical settings, even in elementary number theory. Following Gödel, there has been an intensive study of noncomputable sets arising in ordinary mathematics. The computably enumerable (c.e.) sets (those which can be listed by a computable method) are of particular interest because they appear naturally in most branches of mathematics and there is a noncomputable c.e. set. Thus, they play a key role in well-known results such as Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, the unsolvability of the word problem for finitely presented groups, and the unsolvability of Hilbert’s tenth problem on Diophantine equations. Turing [Tur39] introduced the notion of a set of natural numbers A being computable relative to set B, written A ≤T B. The equivalence class of A under ≡T is the (Turing) degree of A. Friedberg [Fri57] and independently Mučnik [Muc56] solved Post’s problem by producing a noncomputable incomplete c.e. set, and in doing so introduced the finite injury priority method. Let 0 denote the degree of the computable sets and 0′ denote the degree of K, the complete c.e. set, and let R = (R, <,0,0′). Lower case boldface letters a,b, c, . . .x,y, z denote c.e. degrees. The Friedberg-Mučnik theorem may be regarded as the first and easiest extension of embeddings result for R. It asserts that (∃x)[0 < x < 0′].

[1]  K. Gödel Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I , 1931 .

[2]  R. Shore The recursively enumerable α-degrees are dense , 1976 .

[3]  Richard A. Shore,et al.  Working below a low2 recursively enumerably degree , 1990, Arch. Math. Log..

[4]  Richard A. Shore,et al.  Embeddings and extensions of embeddings in the r.e. tt and wtt-degrees , 1985 .

[5]  Saharon Shelah,et al.  The undecidability of the recursively enumerable degrees , 1982 .

[6]  B. M. Fulk MATH , 1992 .

[7]  Alistair H. Lachlan,et al.  Lower Bounds for Pairs of Recursively Enumerable Degrees , 1966 .

[8]  G. Sacks ON THE DEGREES LESS THAN 0 , 1963 .

[9]  Martin Davis,et al.  The Undecidable: Basic Papers on Undecidable Propositions, Unsolvable Problems and Computable Functions , 2004 .

[10]  R. Friedberg,et al.  TWO RECURSIVELY ENUMERABLE SETS OF INCOMPARABLE DEGREES OF UNSOLVABILITY (SOLUTION OF POST'S PROBLEM, 1944). , 1957, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  P. Dangerfield Logic , 1996, Aristotle and the Stoics.

[12]  Editors , 1986, Brain Research Bulletin.

[13]  R. Soare Recursively enumerable sets and degrees , 1987 .

[14]  C. E. M. Yates A Minimal Pair of Recursively Enumerable Degrees , 1966, J. Symb. Log..

[15]  Robert I. Soare,et al.  Games in Recursion Theory and Continuity Properties of Capping Degrees , 1992 .

[16]  Alan M. Turing,et al.  Systems of Logic Based on Ordinals , 2012, Alan Turing's Systems of Logic.

[17]  A. Lachlan A recursively enumerable degree which will not split over all lesser ones , 1976 .

[18]  Kurt Gödel,et al.  On undecidable propositions of formal mathematical systems , 1934 .

[19]  Gerald E. Sacks,et al.  The Recursively Enumerable Degrees are Dense , 1964 .