Economic optimization of feedstock mix for energy production with biogas technology in Germany with a special focus on sugar beets – Effects on greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances

Power production from biogas is quite common in Germany and other parts of the world. German biogas production, in particular, primarily uses silage corn as feedstock which is unpopular with the society because of the negative side effects. Sugar beets could be an alternative. This paper maps the aggregated results concerning the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy balances of power production from different energy crops at national level based on field experiments and all biogas plants registered in Germany. The regional feedstock production costs integrated into the objective function of a plant specific linear optimization model were calculated based on regional production circumstances and district specific yields. Different scenarios with e.g. a fixed share of sugar beets in biogas plant feedstock mix as well as yield increases due to biological and technical progress of silage corn and sugar beets were compared to a business as usual scenario in terms of their effects on GHG emissions and energy balances of power production. The results demonstrated that the GHG emissions and energy balances depend on regional production circumstances. Furthermore, forcing sugar beets into feedstock mix resulted in generally higher GHG emissions and deteriorated energy balances.

[1]  Barbara Amon,et al.  Data sets to assess methane emissions from untreated cattle and pig slurry and solid manure storage systems in the German and Austrian emission inventories , 2012 .

[2]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[3]  Brigitte Eurich-Menden,et al.  Calculations of gaseous and particulate emissions from German agriculture 1990 - 2012 : Report on methods and data (RMD) Submission 2014 , 2014 .

[4]  John P. Doll,et al.  Production Economics: Theory with Applications , 1978 .

[5]  P. Weiland Biogas production: current state and perspectives , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[6]  Sara González-García,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops , 2014 .

[7]  Daniel Felten,et al.  Energy balances and greenhouse gas-mitigation potentials of bioenergy cropping systems (Miscanthus, rapeseed, and maize) based on farming conditions in Western Germany , 2013 .

[8]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[9]  A. Meyer-Aurich,et al.  Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources , 2012 .

[10]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[11]  David Styles,et al.  Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms , 2015 .

[12]  Stefan Lechtenböhmer,et al.  Decarbonization and regulation of Germany's electricity system after Fukushima , 2013 .

[13]  M. Nelles,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  Kaisa Manninen,et al.  Carbon footprint of selected biomass to biogas production chains and GHG reduction potential in transportation use , 2014 .

[15]  B. Campbell,et al.  Climate Change and Food Systems , 2012 .

[16]  Karin Arnold,et al.  Analyse und Bewertung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten von Biomasse. Band 1: Gesamtergebnisse und Schlussfolgerungen (Wuppertal Institut) , 2005 .

[17]  Sara González-García,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  John Tzilivakis,et al.  Environmental impact and economic assessment for UK sugar beet production systems , 2005 .

[19]  G Jungmeier,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates--implications for greenhouse gas emissions. , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[20]  Mikael Lantz,et al.  Comparing energy crops for biogas production Yields, energy input and costs in cultivation using digestate and mineral fertilisation , 2014 .

[21]  Wilhelm Claupein,et al.  Profitability analysis of cropping systems for biogas production on marginal sites in southwestern Germany , 2012 .

[22]  Sonia Heaven,et al.  Biochemical methane potential of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Influence of growth stage and storage practice. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[23]  K. Ekschmitt,et al.  Increased energy maize production reduces farmland bird diversity , 2014 .

[24]  S. Bosch,et al.  Gegenwind für die Erneuerbaren – Räumliche Neuorientierung der Wind-, Solar- und Bioenergie vor dem Hintergrund einer verringerten Akzeptanz sowie zunehmender Flächennutzungskonflikte im ländlichen Raum , 2011 .

[25]  Ville Uusitalo,et al.  Evaluation of methods for estimating energy performance of biogas production , 2014 .

[26]  A. Herrmann,et al.  Biogas Production from Maize: Current State, Challenges and Prospects. 2. Agronomic and Environmental Aspects , 2013, BioEnergy Research.

[27]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion , 2014 .

[28]  Karin Naumann,et al.  Monitoring zur Wirkung des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz (EEG) auf die Entwicklung der Stromerzeugung aus Biomasse , 2012 .

[29]  Paolo Balsari,et al.  A floating coverage system for digestate liquid fraction storage. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[30]  S. Bringezu,et al.  Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of maize-biogas and photovoltaics on a land use basis , 2010 .

[31]  M. Jones,et al.  Analysis of the use of energy in agriculture--Approaches and problems , 1989 .

[32]  Barbara Amon,et al.  Methane production through anaerobic digestion of various energy crops grown in sustainable crop rotations. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[33]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems , 2007 .

[34]  Jens Lansche,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy generation of biogas fed combined heat and power plants: Environmental impact of different agricultural substrates , 2012 .

[35]  M. Berglund,et al.  Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production , 2006 .

[36]  Sonia Heaven,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of whole-crop winter wheat silage for renewable energy production , 2012 .

[37]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  Technical and economic analysis of biogas production in Ireland utilising three different crop rotations , 2009 .

[38]  Michael Nelles,et al.  Flexible biogas production for demand-driven energy supply--feeding strategies and types of substrates. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[39]  J. Olesen,et al.  Biogas in organic agriculture—effects on productivity, energy self-sufficiency and greenhouse gas emissions , 2013, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[40]  Shane Ward,et al.  Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways , 2010 .

[41]  Thomas de Witte,et al.  Auswirkungen der Biogaserzeugung auf die Landwirtschaft , 2013 .

[42]  Peter Weiland,et al.  Methane emissions from biogas‐producing facilities within the agricultural sector , 2010 .

[43]  E. Ladewig,et al.  Environmental Situation and Yield Performance of the Sugar Beet Crop in Germany: Heading for Sustainable Development , 2003 .

[44]  Henning Kage,et al.  Emission of N2O from Biogas Crop Production Systems in Northern Germany , 2014, BioEnergy Research.

[45]  Olaf Christen,et al.  The sugar beet as an energy crop in crop rotations on highly productive sites - an agronomic/economic system analysis. , 2014 .

[46]  Jean-Marc Jossart,et al.  Energy and CO2 balance of maize and grass as energy crops for anaerobic digestion. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[47]  K. Hülsbergen,et al.  A method of energy balancing in crop production and its application in a long-term fertilizer trial , 2001 .